Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: Synopsis of the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline Update
FREEAbstract
Description:
The KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease is an update of the 2020 guideline from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).
Methods:
The KDIGO Work Group updated the guideline, which included reviewing and grading new evidence that was identified and summarized. As in the previous guideline, the Work Group used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to appraise evidence and rate the strength of recommendations and expert judgment to develop consensus practice points. New evidence led to updating of recommendations in the chapters Comprehensive Care in Patients With Diabetes and CKD (Chapter 1) and Glucose-Lowering Therapies in Patients With T2D and CKD (Chapter 4). New evidence did not change recommendations in the chapters Glycemic Monitoring and Targets in Patients With Diabetes and CKD (Chapter 2), Lifestyle Interventions in Patients With Diabetes and CKD (Chapter 3), and Approaches to Management of Patients With Diabetes and CKD (Chapter 5).
Recommendations:
The updated guideline includes 13 recommendations and 52 practice points for clinicians caring for patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). A focus on preserving kidney function and maintaining well-being is recommended using a layered approach to care, starting with a foundation of lifestyle interventions, self-management, and first-line pharmacotherapy (such as sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes. To this are added additional drugs with heart and kidney protection, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and interventions to control risk factors for CKD progression and cardiovascular events, such as blood pressure, glycemia, and lipids.
In light of the emergence of new high-quality evidence, the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (1) update follows only 2 years after the original 2020 guideline (2). The overall scope and systematic literature search for the update were unchanged from the original guideline and addressed both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), all stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and patients who had a kidney transplant or those treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (2). High-quality evidence on patient care, specifically from randomized controlled trials, was evaluated. This led to revision of recommendations on what constitutes comprehensive care, use of sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), as well as the introduction of a new section on use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs).
Methods
Full methods for the guideline development process are described in the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (1). The guideline follows international standards for guideline development (3, 4) and has been reported in accordance with the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) reporting checklist (5). The original Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Guideline Work Group (WG) was reconvened for this update. The WG comprised nephrologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, primary care physicians, registered dietitians, and patients. Conflicts of interest were fully disclosed and published alongside the guideline.
Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, the Evidence Review Team (ERT), conducted the literature searches for each topic covered in the 2020 guideline in December 2021, limiting the searches to randomized controlled trials only, and updated these searches in February 2022 at the time of the public review. The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis methods undertaken for the KDIGO 2020 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease were followed for the 2022 guideline update (2). Newly identified evidence was presented to the WG, who reviewed the ERT summaries to determine if a full quantitative reassessment and reconsideration of recommendations was justified. For these topics, the ERT updated the evidence synthesis (both narrative and quantitative) and reassessed the grading for the quality of the evidence base using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods (6).
The WG met virtually to discuss and finalize the guideline statements through consensus. As before, the WG developed recommendations using the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework and considered the balance of benefits and harms, quality of evidence, values and preferences, resource use and costs, and considerations for implementation for each recommendation statement (7). In addition to the 13 graded recommendations, 52 ungraded practice points were developed to provide clinicians with expert input or guidance for implementation (Appendix Table).
 |
Comprehensive Care
The updated 2022 guideline advocates a comprehensive, holistic approach to patient care, including control of multiple risk factors and a collaborative partnership among patients with CKD, health care providers, and health systems to implement evidence-based recommendations that have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes (Figure 1) (1, 8–11). Lifestyle interventions are an important key feature of the recommendations, and the updated recommendations now include therapies that have been shown to improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with diabetes and CKD. Specifically, SGLT2 inhibitors are the preferred first-line pharmacologic therapy for patients with T2D and CKD, regardless of glycemic control, with other glucose-lowering therapies added to the SGLT2 inhibitors to maintain individualized glycemic targets (Figure 2).
Patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease should be treated with a comprehensive approach to improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. This approach should include a foundation of lifestyle modification and self-management for all patients, on which are layered first-line drug therapies according to clinical characteristics (in parentheses), additional drugs with proven kidney and heart protection as guided by assessments of residual risk, and additional interventions as needed to further control risk factors. Glycemic control is based on insulin for type 1 diabetes and a combination of metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors for T2D. Metformin may be given when the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2; SGLT2 inhibitor therapy should be initiated when eGFR is ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m2 and continued as tolerated until dialysis or transplantation is initiated. RAS inhibition is recommended for patients with albuminuria and HTN. GLP-1 RAs are the preferred glucose-lowering drugs for patients with T2D—especially if the patient is overweight or obese, if SGLT2 inhibitors with or without metformin are insufficient to meet glycemic targets, or if the patient cannot use SGLT2 inhibitors or metformin. An ns-MRA can be added to first-line therapy for patients with T2D and high residual risks for kidney disease progression and cardiovascular events, as evidenced by persistent albuminuria (>30 mg/g creatinine). Aspirin generally should be used lifelong for secondary prevention among those with established cardiovascular disease and may be considered for primary prevention among patients with high risk for ASCVD. ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; GLP-1 RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HTN = hypertension; ns-MRA = nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; RAS = renin–angiotensin system; SGLT2 = sodium–glucose cotransporter-2; T2D = type 2 diabetes. (Reproduced from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group [1]; used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.).
Icons indicate the following benefits: BP cuff = BP lowering; glucometer = glucose lowering; heart = heart protection; kidney = kidney protection; and scale = weight management. ACR = albumin–creatinine ratio; ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BP = blood pressure; CCB = calcium-channel blocker; CVD = cardiovascular disease; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; GLP-1 RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HTN = hypertension; MRA = mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; PCSK9i = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor; RAS = renin–angiotensin system; SGLT2i = sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor; T1D = type 1 diabetes; T2D = type 2 diabetes. (Reproduced from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group [1]; used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.)
* Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker should be first-line therapy for HTN when albuminuria is present; otherwise, dihydropyridine CCB or diuretic can also be considered. All 3 classes are often needed to attain BP targets.
† Finerenone is currently the only nonsteroidal MRA with proven clinical kidney and cardiovascular benefits.
SGLT2 Inhibitors
The KDIGO 2020 guideline recommended SGLT2 inhibitors for patients with kidney disease and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (1). The updated guideline now recommends initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in those with an eGFR of at least 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Appendix Figure).
ACR = albumin–creatinine ratio; AKI = acute kidney injury; CKD = chronic kidney disease; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; SGLT2 = sodium–glucose cotransporter-2. (Reproduced from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group [1]; used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.)
* Sick day protocol (for illness or excessive exercise or alcohol intake): Temporarily withhold SGLT2 inhibitors; keep drinking and eating (if possible); check blood glucose and blood ketone levels more often; and seek medical help early, especially if patient has nausea and vomiting.
† Periprocedural/perioperative care: Inform patients about risk for diabetic ketoacidosis, especially in patients with long disease duration during acute illnesses due to relative insulin insufficiency and increased stress hormones; withhold SGLT2 inhibitors the day of day-stay procedures and limit fasting to minimum required; withhold SGLT2 inhibitors at least 2 d in advance and on the day of a procedure requiring ≥1 d in the hospital and/or bowel preparation (which may require increasing doses of other glucose-lowering drugs during that time); measure both blood glucose and blood ketone levels on hospital admission (proceed with procedure if the patient is clinically well and ketone concentration is ≤1.0 mmol/L); and restart SGLT2 inhibitor therapy after procedure only when patient is eating and drinking normally.
Since the original guideline was published, 7 large trials examining the cardiovascular and kidney effects of various SGLT2 inhibitors have reported results (12–18). These results warranted a lowering of the eGFR threshold for use of SGLT2 inhibitors. Furthermore, given the strong evidence in diverse patient populations with CKD, including those without diabetes, this topic was moved from Chapter 4 (Glucose-Lowering Therapies in Patients With T2D and CKD) to Chapter 1 (Comprehensive Care in Patients With Diabetes and CKD). This change acknowledges the evidence that benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors is independent of glycemic control and the recommendation to use SGLT2 inhibitors for organ protection (heart and kidney) in patients with CKD.
Of the 7 new trials, 4 trials (2 including patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [17, 18] and 2 enrolling patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [12, 14]) demonstrated benefits for cardiovascular events and kidney disease progression as a prespecified secondary end point. In the CKD population, the DAPA-CKD (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease) trial (16) and SCORED (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk) trial (13) enrolled patients with CKD and eGFR as low as 25 mL/min/1.73 m2. The DAPA-CKD trial, which included patients with and without diabetes, reported kidney and cardiovascular benefits for both subsets of patients. In addition, the EMPA-KIDNEY (Study of Heart and Kidney Protection With Empagliflozin) trial (19) was stopped early because of clear efficacy; namely, empagliflozin therapy led to a lower risk for progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes than placebo in a population with CKD and eGFR as low as 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, with and without albuminuria, and with and without diabetes.
The newer trials showed cardiovascular and kidney benefits across all categories of eGFR, and altogether trials have demonstrated similar benefits across categories of albuminuria (including normal albumin excretion) (12–19). EMPA-KIDNEY, as well as the heart failure trials EMPEROR-Reduced (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) (18) and EMPEROR-Preserved (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) (12), included participants with eGFR as low as 20 mL/min/1.73 m2. Sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are likely to have reduced glucose-lowering efficacy at lower eGFR, and the cardiovascular and kidney benefits reported in these trials were proportionately greater than the reductions in hemoglobin A1c, suggesting that the kidney and cardiovascular benefits are not primarily attributable to the glucose-lowering effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. Therefore, the updated guideline recommends the use of SGLT2 inhibitors among all patients with T2D and CKD (based on albuminuria or low eGFR without albuminuria) with an eGFR of at least 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Grade 1A).
GLP-1 RAs
The recommended second-line drug class for glucose lowering in T2D and CKD continues to be GLP-1 RAs (Figure 2). One new trial (AMPLITUDE-O [Effect of Efpeglenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes] [20]) was added to the evidence for cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 RAs and bolstered the hypothesis that GLP-1 RAs may also improve kidney outcomes. Cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 RAs have been reported across strata of eGFR and are the major rationale for recommending this class as the preferred glucose-lowering drug for patients with T2D and CKD who are not attaining glycemic goals despite use of SGLT2 inhibitors and metformin (or who cannot use SGLT2 inhibitors or metformin). Because weight loss may also be important for some patients with CKD, including those who want to lose weight before kidney transplantation, a new practice point highlighting the potential advantages of weight loss with GLP-1 RAs was added to the updated guideline (Table) (1).
 |
Nonsteroidal MRAs
A new section on the use of MRAs has been included in the updated guideline (1); MRAs reduce residual proteinuria in those receiving renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors. Several small clinical trials have shown the antiproteinuric effects of steroidal MRAs without development of hyperkalemia; however, the beneficial effects of steroidal MRAs on kidney disease progression had not been established.
Two large, phase 3, clinical trials (FIDELIO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease] [21] and FIGARO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease] [22]) evaluated the kidney and cardiovascular benefits of finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal MRA (ns-MRA), in those with T2D and CKD. Both FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD included participants with T2D who were receiving the maximum tolerated dose of a RAS inhibitor and had residual albuminuria (albumin–creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g) and a serum potassium level less than 4.8 mmol/L at screening. The mean eGFR of the study population was 57.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, and two thirds of the population had an albumin–creatinine ratio above 300 mg/g. In the FIDELIO-DKD trial, finerenone significantly reduced the primary composite kidney outcome (kidney failure, sustained ≥40% decrease in eGFR, or death from kidney causes) by 18% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73 to 0.93]) and the secondary composite cardiovascular outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) by 14% (HR, 0.86 [CI, 0.75 to 0.99]) (21). In the FIGARO-DKD trial, finerenone reduced the primary composite cardiovascular outcome by 13% (HR, 0.87 [CI, 0.76 to 0.98]) (22).
In the prespecified pooled analyses of the 2 trials (FIDELITY [Finerenone in Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: Combined FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD Trial Programme Analysis] [23]), a 14% lower risk for the cardiovascular composite outcome was shown in those treated with finerenone compared with placebo (HR, 0.86 [CI, 0.78 to 0.95]) (23). Finerenone also reduced the risk for the kidney composite outcome (kidney failure, ≥57% decrease in eGFR, or death from kidney causes; HR, 0.77 [CI, 0.67 to 0.88]) and the risk for kidney failure (initiation of maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation; HR, 0.80 [CI, 0.64 to 0.99]). The main safety concern was hyperkalemia, which was more common with finerenone than placebo (14% vs. 6.9%). However, the cumulative incidence of permanent discontinuation of study drug treatment due to hyperkalemia was low overall—1.7% and 0.6% among finerenone and placebo recipients, respectively—with no deaths due to hyperkalemia reported in a study population with normal serum potassium levels at study entry (23).
On the basis of the high-quality evidence from the FIGARO-DKD and FIDELIO-DKD trials, the use of an ns-MRA with proven kidney or cardiovascular benefit is now recommended for patients with T2D, eGFR of at least 25 mL/min/1.73 m2, normal serum potassium concentration, and albuminuria (albumin–creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g) despite receiving the maximum tolerated dose of a RAS inhibitor (Grade 2A; new recommendation in the 2022 guideline update). The recommendation is level 2—weak or “we suggest”—for the following reasons: availability of efficacy and safety data (especially hyperkalemia) for only 1 drug in the class, underrepresentation of patients with moderate albuminuria, lack of data about the additive effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and MRAs, and lack of real-world data showing the safety of ns-MRAs.
Discussion
The updated KDIGO 2022 guideline advocates a layered approach to care, starting with a foundation of lifestyle interventions and first-line pharmacotherapy demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes (1). To this, other therapies are added to reduce risk for adverse outcomes and to control risk factors for CKD progression and cardiovascular events, such as blood pressure, glycemia, and lipids. Although other guidelines have suggested viewing multifactorial therapy as “pillars” of care (24–26), the KDIGO layered approach includes the preference for starting new treatments one at a time and then reassessing response and residual risk to further refine therapy. To maximize the tolerability of combination treatments, the guideline recommends the serial introduction of medications that improve intrarenal hemodynamics (such as RAS inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, MRAs, diuretics, and other antihypertensive medications). Ongoing monitoring is critical to ensuring that each patient ultimately receives the optimal therapeutic regimen.
With new therapies that can reduce progression of CKD and diminish the burden of cardiovascular disease, including heart failure, health care providers should focus on preserving kidney function and maintaining well-being rather than replacing kidney function (27). The beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, ns-MRAs, and GLP-1 RAs on CKD and cardiovascular disease provide an opportunity to achieve these goals and save millions of lives, but these therapies will only benefit patients with diabetes and CKD if implemented widely. Successful implementation will necessarily involve collective efforts from all stakeholders, including patients with diabetes and CKD as well as health systems, payers, regulators, and life science industries (28). It will also require concerted action for early detection of CKD, education of health care providers in multidisciplinary interventions, and empowerment of patients with diabetes and CKD to ensure engagement and self-care (29). Of note, implementation will require community outreach efforts to make care accessible and equitable, with patient preferences and priorities shaping strategies.
The cost of new therapies is clearly a barrier to implementation (30). However, avoiding or delaying costly kidney replacement therapy with the use of these agents may make it cost-effective to implement new therapies (31–33) while we await more data to support broader access. Creating a convincing case for the use of CKD therapies as part of a health system strategy for value-based care, along with lowering the cost of new therapies, is essential to translating theoretical cost-effectiveness analyses into reality. This guideline suggests that policymakers and institutional decision makers implement team-based, integrated care focused on risk evaluation and patient empowerment to provide comprehensive care for patients with diabetes and CKD (28).
Multiple professional societies issue recommendations for care of patients with diabetes, CKD, or both (34), and the existence of multiple guidelines can create the appearance of inconsistency. To address this concern, concurrent with delivery of the 2022 guideline, KDIGO partnered with the American Diabetes Association to issue a consensus report on the diagnosis and management of diabetes and CKD (35). This report provides aligned, evidence-based recommendations from these 2 professional societies and emphasizes high-priority interventions (35). In addition, the consensus report addresses aspects of CKD prevention, screening, and diagnosis, which are important clinical topics not explicitly covered in the KDIGO guideline. Implementation of evidence-based treatments is now critical to improving the outcomes of patients living with diabetes and CKD.
References
- 1.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group . KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2022;102:S1-S127. [PMID: 36272764] doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 2.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group . KDIGO 2020 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2020;98:S1-S115. [PMID: 32998798] doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.019 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 3. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. National Academies Pr; 2011. Google Scholar
- 4.
Schünemann HJ ,Fretheim A ,Oxman AD . Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:21. [PMID: 17147810] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 5.
Brouwers MC ,Kho ME ,Browman GP ,et al ;AGREE Next Steps Consortium . AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1308-11. [PMID: 20656455] doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.001 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 6.
Guyatt GH ,Oxman AD ,Schünemann HJ ,et al . GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:380-2. [PMID: 21185693] doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 7.
Moberg J ,Oxman AD ,Rosenbaum S ,et al ;GRADE Working Group . The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16:45. [PMID: 29843743] doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 8.
Chan JC ,So WY ,Yeung CY ,et al ;SURE Study Group . Effects of structured versus usual care on renal endpoint in type 2 diabetes: the SURE study: a randomized multicenter translational study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:977-82. [PMID: 19460913] doi:10.2337/dc08-1908 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.
Chan JCN ,Thewjitcharoen Y ,Nguyen TK ,et al . Effect of a web-based management guide on risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic kidney disease: a JADE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e223862 . [PMID: 35333363] doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3862 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.
Gaede P ,Vedel P ,Parving HH ,et al . Intensified multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: the Steno type 2 randomised study. Lancet. 1999;353:617-22. [PMID: 10030326] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 11.
Ueki K ,Sasako T ,Okazaki Y ,et al ;J-DOIT3 Study Group . Effect of an intensified multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in type 2 diabetes (J-DOIT3): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:951-964. [PMID: 29079252] doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30327-3 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 12.
Anker SD ,Butler J ,Filippatos G ,et al ;EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Investigators . Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1451-1461. [PMID: 34449189] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2107038 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 13.
Bhatt DL ,Szarek M ,Pitt B ,et al ;SCORED Investigators . Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:129-139. [PMID: 33200891] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2030186 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 14.
Bhatt DL ,Szarek M ,Steg PG ,et al ;SOLOIST-WHF Trial Investigators . Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:117-128. [PMID: 33200892] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2030183 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 15.
Cannon CP ,Pratley R ,Dagogo-Jack S ,et al ;VERTIS CV Investigators . Cardiovascular outcomes with ertugliflozin in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1425-1435. [PMID: 32966714] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2004967 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 16.
Heerspink HJL ,Stefánsson BV ,Correa-Rotter R ,et al ;DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators . Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1436-1446. [PMID: 32970396] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2024816 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 17.
McMurray JJV ,Solomon SD ,Inzucchi SE ,et al ;DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators . Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1995-2008. [PMID: 31535829] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1911303 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 18.
Packer M ,Anker SD ,Butler J ,et al ;EMPEROR-Reduced Trial Investigators . Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1413-1424. [PMID: 32865377] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2022190 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 19.
Herrington WG ,Staplin N ,Wanner C ,et al ;EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group . Empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2022. [PMID: 36331190] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2204233 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 20.
Gerstein HC ,Sattar N ,Rosenstock J ,et al ;AMPLITUDE-O Trial Investigators . Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with efpeglenatide in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:896-907. [PMID: 34215025] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2108269 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 21.
Bakris GL ,Agarwal R ,Anker SD ,et al ;FIDELIO-DKD Investigators . Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2219-2229. [PMID: 33264825] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2025845 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 22.
Pitt B ,Filippatos G ,Agarwal R ,et al ;FIGARO-DKD Investigators . Cardiovascular events with finerenone in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:2252-2263. [PMID: 34449181] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2110956 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 23.
Agarwal R ,Filippatos G ,Pitt B ,et al ;FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD investigators . Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:474-484. [PMID: 35023547] doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab777 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 24. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(suppl 1):S1-S264. Accessed at https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/45/Supplement_1 on 6 January 2022. Google Scholar
- 25.
Ponikowski P ,Voors AA ,Anker SD ,et al ;ESC Scientific Document Group . 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129-2200. [PMID: 27206819] doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 26.
Yancy CW ,Jessup M ,Bozkurt B ,et al . 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2017;136:e137-e161 . [PMID: 28455343] doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 27.
Kliger AS ,Brosius FC ;Diabetic Kidney Disease Task Force of the American Society of Nephrology . Preserving kidney function instead of replacing it. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15:129-131. [PMID: 31594804] doi:10.2215/CJN.07820719 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 28.
Chan JCN ,Lim LL ,Wareham NJ ,et al . The Lancet Commission on diabetes: using data to transform diabetes care and patient lives. Lancet. 2021;396:2019-2082. [PMID: 33189186] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32374-6 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 29.
Brosius FC ,Cherney D ,Gee PO ,et al ;DKD-Collaborative ASN Taskforce . Transforming the care of patients with diabetic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;16:1590-1600. [PMID: 34103350] doi:10.2215/CJN.18641120 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 30.
Tuttle KR ,Wong L ,St Peter W ,et al ;Diabetic Kidney Disease Collaborative Task Force . Moving from evidence to implementation of breakthrough therapies for diabetic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;17:1092-1103. [PMID: 35649722] doi:10.2215/CJN.02980322 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 31.
Abegaz TM ,Diaby V ,Sherbeny F ,et al . Cost effectiveness of dapagliflozin added to standard of care for the management of diabetic nephropathy in the USA. Clin Drug Investig. 2022;42:501-511. [PMID: 35614298] doi:10.1007/s40261-022-01160-8 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 32.
Igarashi A ,Maruyama-Sakurai K ,Kubota A ,et al . Cost-effectiveness analysis of initiating type 2 diabetes therapy with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor versus conventional therapy in Japan. Diabetes Ther. 2022;13:1367-1381. [PMID: 35710646] doi:10.1007/s13300-022-01270-8 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 33.
Reifsnider OS ,Kansal AR ,Wanner C ,et al . Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin in patients with diabetic kidney disease in the United States: findings based on the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;79:796-806. [PMID: 34752913] doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.09.014 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 34.
Kelsey MD ,Nelson AJ ,Green JB ,et al . Guidelines for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes: JACC guideline comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:1849-1857. [PMID: 35512864] doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.046 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 35.
de Boer IH ,Khunti K ,Sadusky T ,et al . Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Diabetes Care. 2022. [PMID: 36189689] doi:10.2337/dci22-0027 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Comments
0 Comments
Sign In to Submit A CommentAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Information
Sankar D. Navaneethan,
Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Selzman Institute for Kidney Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, and Section of Nephrology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas (S.D.N.)
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.Z.)
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, and Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (M.L.C.)
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Hong Kong Institute of Diabetes and Obesity, and Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (J.C.N.C.)
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (H.J.L.H.)
Houston, Texas (C.H.)
The Kidney & Transplant Practice, Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore (A.L.)
Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (E.D.M.)
Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension Unit, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, State of Osum, Nigeria (W.A.O.)
Seattle, Washington (T.S.)
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India (N.T.)
Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Spokane, Washington (K.R.T.)
Division of Nephrology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (C.W.)
Nutrition and Fitness Services, Northwest Kidney Centers, Seattle, Washington (K.G.W.)
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, and Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (J.C.C.)
Cochrane Kidney and Transplant and Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (D.J.T.)
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (M.T.)
KDIGO, Brussels, Belgium (M.C., A.E.)
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (P.R.)
Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (I.H.B.)
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom (K.K.).
Acknowledgment: The authors thank the following people for their contribution to this important guideline effort: Melissa Thompson, Debbie Maizels, Patrizia Natale, Giovanni F.M. Strippoli, Tess E. Cooper, Narelle Willis, Michel Jadoul, Wolfgang Winkelmayer, Kathleen Conn, Tanya Green, and Coral Cyzewski.
Financial Support: This guideline is supported by KDIGO, and no funding is accepted for the development of specific guidelines.
Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M22-2904.
Corresponding Author: Kamlesh Khunti, MD, PhD, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, United Kingdom; e-mail, kk22@leicester.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: M.L. Caramori, J.C. Craig, I.H. de Boer, A. Earley, K. Khunti, S.D. Navaneethan, P. Rossing, D.J. Tunnicliffe, K.R. Tuttle, C. Wanner, S. Zoungas, C. Hurst.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: M.L. Caramori, J.C.N. Chan, J.C. Craig, A. Earley, E.D. Michos, S.D. Navaneethan, W.A. Olowu, T. Sadusky, D.J. Tunnicliffe, C. Wanner, K.G. Wilkens, S. Zoungas.
Drafting of the article: A. Earley, K. Khunti, A. Liew, S.D. Navaneethan, W.A. Olowu, P. Rossing, T. Sadusky, K.R. Tuttle, S. Zoungas, C. Hurst.
Critical revision for important intellectual content: M.L. Caramori, J.C.N. Chan, J.C. Craig, I.H. de Boer, A. Earley, H.J.L. Heerspink, K. Khunti, E.D. Michos, S.D. Navaneethan, W.A. Olowu, P. Rossing, N. Tandon, M. Tonelli, D.J. Tunnicliffe, K.R. Tuttle, C. Wanner, K.G. Wilkens, S. Zoungas.
Final approval of the article: M.L. Caramori, J.C.N. Chan, M. Cheung, J.C. Craig, I.H. de Boer, A. Earley, H.J.L. Heerspink, C. Hurst, K. Khunti, A. Liew, E.D. Michos, S.D. Navaneethan, W.A. Olowu, P. Rossing, T. Sadusky, N. Tandon, M. Tonelli, D.J. Tunnicliffe, K.R. Tuttle, C. Wanner, K.G. Wilkens, S. Zoungas.
Statistical expertise: J.C. Craig, D.J. Tunnicliffe.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: M. Cheung, J.C. Craig, A. Earley, M. Tonelli.
Collection and assembly of data: P. Rossing, T. Sadusky, D.J. Tunnicliffe.
This article was published at Annals.org on 10 January 2023.
* Drs. Navaneethan and Zoungas contributed equally to this work and should be considered co–first authors.
Letter to the Editor: Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: Synopsis of the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline Update
We have reviewed the guideline update prepared by Navaneethan et al. with great interest 1, which is important to create an algorithm with current treatment approaches for diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. However, considering that older adults (>65) constitute approximately half of diabetic patients 2 and , we think that there are a couple of special issues that need to be considered for elderly patients in the guideline update.
To begin with, the decrease in regeneration and functional performance with aging is more pronounced and serious in diabetes mellitus 3. It is known that elderly patients with impaired renal function are vulnerable to the hypoglycemia which is significant side effect of sulfonylureas 4 and that hypoglycemia can cause many problems such as impaired cognitive function, falls, stroke, cardiovascular events and even death in the elderly 5,6. Considering these facts, switching to another drug which has less risk of hypoglycemia, rather than reducing the dose of sulfonylurea in older adults may be more appropriate strategy.
Additionally, although SGLT-2 inhibitors provide significant advantages such as reduction of HbA1c, weight loss, reduction in the severity of renal failure, and positive cardiac effects, side effects such as orthostatic hypotension, dehydration, and development of urinary tract infection (UTI) were more likely to occur in elderly patients 7. Of them, UTI is a significant cause of morbidity in older adults 8. Age is a risk factor for UTI in itself, due to increased urinary incontinence, urinary retention, hospitalizations, concomitant urinary catheterizations rates and immunosenesence with aging 9.
Moreover, orthostatic hypotension is significantly associated with a range of adverse cardiovascular, cognitive, and mortality outcomes in elderly patients10. In this regard, older adults which have increased risk of UTI, orthostatic hypotension, should be evaluated individually for treatment.
In conclusion, it is clear that the current guideline will be beneficial to healthcare professionals in the management of diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, considering the aforementioned concerns, we believe that the guideline may be more useful for geriatric practice, and so it is possible that elderly diabetics with CKD may more benefit from the treatment individualized for them.
References