Long-Term Effects of Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
Abstract
Background:
Objective:
Design:
Setting:
Participants:
Intervention:
Measurements:
Results:
Limitation:
Conclusion:
Primary Funding Source:
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Supplemental Material
- Download
- 1.28 MB
- Download
- 572.33 KB
References
Comments
Sign In to Submit A CommentInformation & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Keywords
Copyright
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Long-Term Effects of Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. [Epub 3 September 2024]. doi:10.7326/M23-2425
View More
Get Access
Login Options:
Purchase
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.
Create your Free Account
You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.
Rigid Acupuncture Protocols and Their Limitations in Chronic Neck Pain
Zhao et al. conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the long-term efficacy of acupuncture for chronic neck pain (CNP), comparing high-sensitivity acupoints (HSA), low-sensitivity acupoints (LSA), and sham acupuncture (SA) over 24 weeks. The study found both HSA and LSA more effective than SA and a waiting list control in reducing neck pain, with sustained effects. However, the improvement did not meet the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), limiting the clinical significance of the findings (1).
A key critique of the study is the comparison between sham acupuncture (SA) and real acupuncture, which is not entirely valid. The so-called SA used in this trial is a form of minimal-felt real acupuncture, except for its placebo effect, and has been widely employed by acupuncturists in Japan, Western countries, and even some in China. It is not physiologically inert (2,3). Additionally, the use of "never-used-before points" as the sham acupoints complicates the interpretation of the results, as it introduces two variables in SA: the stimulation dose and the location (4).
Both the HSA and LSA groups showed a reduction in neck pain by week 4, meeting the MCID. However, the net difference between the groups was small—only 1.97 points on a 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This minimal difference raises concerns about the true clinical impact of individualized acupuncture, as statistical significance may not translate into meaningful patient benefits.
The MCID—defined as a 10-point change on the VAS—was not well-justified for this context. The observed improvements failed to meet this threshold, especially when accounting for the effects of the waiting list and natural changes over time. This raises questions about whether the reported benefits reflect meaningful changes in patients’ experiences. Without a clear rationale for selecting this threshold, the clinical significance remains uncertain.
In real-world settings, patients typically receive acupuncture 2-3 times per week, with treatment frequency adjusted based on individual response. However, this study followed a fixed regimen of 10 sessions over 4 weeks, which may not reflect the flexibility and variability of actual clinical care. This rigidity could limit the generalizability of the trial's findings. Systematic reviews, such as Vickers' 2012 review (5), have shown stronger evidence supporting acupuncture for chronic neck pain, particularly when more flexible treatment protocols are employed. These real-world practices may lead to more effective outcomes than those observed in the controlled environment of this trial.
References
1. Zhao L, Sun M, Yin Z, et al. Long-Term Effects of Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep 3. doi: 10.7326/M23-2425. Online ahead of print. PMID: 39222507
2. Fan AY, Gu S. Acupuncture and Doxylamine-Pyridoxine for Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Feb;177(2):eL230425. doi: 10.7326/L23-0425. PMID: 38373317
3. Zia FZ, Olaku O, Bao T, et al. The National Cancer Institute's Conference on Acupuncture for Symptom Management in Oncology: State of the Science, Evidence, and Research Gaps. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2017 Nov 1;2017(52):lgx005. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgx005. PMID: 29140486
4. Fan AY. Sample size too small? A comment on Acupuncture for the Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome, A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024; July 10. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2799968. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23620.23684.
5. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, et al. Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 22;172(19):1444-53. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3654. PMID: 22965186