ReviewsMarch 2021
A Systematic Review
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
    Background:

    Financial payments from the drug industry to U.S. physicians are common. Payments may influence physicians' clinical decision making and drug prescribing.

    Purpose:

    To evaluate whether receipt of payments from the drug industry is associated with physician prescribing practices.

    Data Sources:

    MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EconLit were searched without language restrictions. The search had no limiting start date and concluded on 16 September 2020.

    Study Selection:

    Studies that estimated the association between receipt of industry payments (exposure) and prescribing (outcome).

    Data Extraction:

    Pairs of reviewers extracted the primary analysis or analyses from each study and evaluated risk of bias (ROB).

    Data Synthesis:

    Thirty-six studies comprising 101 analyses were included. Most studies (n = 30) identified a positive association between payments and prescribing in all analyses; the remainder (n = 6) had a mix of positive and null findings. No study had only null findings. Of 101 individual analyses, 89 identified a positive association. Payments were associated with increased prescribing of the paying company's drug, increased prescribing costs, and increased prescribing of branded drugs. Nine studies assessed and found evidence of a temporal association; 25 assessed and found evidence of a dose–response relationship.

    Limitation:

    The design was observational, 21 of 36 studies had serious ROB, and publication bias was possible.

    Conclusion:

    The association between industry payments and physician prescribing was consistent across all studies that have evaluated this association. Findings regarding a temporal association and dose-response suggest a causal relationship.

    Primary Funding Source:

    National Cancer Institute.

    References

    • 1. Inoue KBlumenthal DMElashoff Det alAssociation between physician characteristics and payments from industry in 2015-2017: observational study. BMJ Open2019;9:e031010. [PMID: 31542759] doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031010 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Mitchell AP, Mishra AA, Dey P, et al. The association between drug industry payments and NCCN guideline panel membership [Abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(Suppl):2068. 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, 4–8 June 2020. Abstract no. 2068. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.2068 Google Scholar
    • 3. Robbins NMMeyer MJBernat JLScope and nature of financial conflicts of interest between neurologists and industry: 2013-2016. Neurology2019;93:438-449. [PMID: 31383793] doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008067 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Schlager EFlaten HSt Claire Cet alIndustry payments to dermatologists: updates from the 2016 Open Payment data. Dermatol Online J2018;24. [PMID: 29906014] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Elsamadicy AAFreedman IGKoo ABet alCharacteristics of reported industry payments to neurosurgeons: a 5-year Open Payments Database study. World Neurosurg2020. [PMID: 33011357] doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.137 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The facts about Open Payments data: 2018 totals. Accessed at https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/summary on 28 March 2020. Google Scholar
    • 7. Schwartz LMWoloshin SMedical marketing in the United States, 1997-2016. JAMA2019;321:80-96. [PMID: 30620375] doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19320 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Brennan TARothman DJBlank Let alHealth industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA2006;295:429-33. [PMID: 16434633] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Lichter ASConflict of interest and the integrity of the medical profession. JAMA2017;317:1725-1726. [PMID: 28464163] doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3191 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Mitchell APBasch EMDusetzina SBFinancial relationships with industry among National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline authors. JAMA Oncol2016;2:1628-1631. [PMID: 27561170] doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2710 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Carr DWelch HGIndustry payments to physician directors of National Cancer Institute–designated cancer centers, 2015-2017. JAMA Intern Med2019. [PMID: 31380888] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3098 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Gill JHaslam ACrain Tet alComparison of industry payments in 2017 with annual salary in a cohort of academic oncologists. JAMA Intern Med2020;180:797-799. [PMID: 32202604] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0090 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Samuel AMWebb MLLukasiewicz AMet alOrthopaedic surgeons receive the most industry payments to physicians but large disparities are seen in Sunshine Act data. Clin Orthop Relat Res2015;473:3297-306. [PMID: 26088767] doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4413-8 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Tringale KRMarshall DMackey TKet alTypes and distribution of payments from industry to physicians in 2015. JAMA2017;317:1774-1784. [PMID: 28464140] doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3091 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Oldani MJThick prescriptions: toward an interpretation of pharmaceutical sales practices. Med Anthropol Q2004;18:325-56. [PMID: 15484967] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Sah SFugh-Berman APhysicians under the influence: social psychology and industry marketing strategies. J Law Med Ethics2013;41:665-72. [PMID: 24088157] doi:10.1111/jlme.12076 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Brax HFadlallah RAl-Khaled Let alAssociation between physicians' interaction with pharmaceutical companies and their clinical practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2017;12:e0175493. [PMID: 28406971] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175493 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Davari MKhorasani ETigabu BMFactors influencing prescribing decisions of physicians: a review. Ethiop J Health Sci2018;28:795-804. [PMID: 30607097] doi:10.4314/ejhs.v28i6.15 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Fickweiler FFickweiler WUrbach EInteractions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians' attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review. BMJ Open2017;7:e016408. [PMID: 28963287] doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016408 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Lexchin JInteractions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say? CMAJ1993;149:1401-7. [PMID: 8221424] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Spurling GKMansfield PRMontgomery BDet alInformation from pharmaceutical companies and the quality, quantity, and cost of physicians' prescribing: a systematic review. PLoS Med2010;7:e1000352. [PMID: 20976098] doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000352 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 6th ed. Cochrane; 2019. Accessed at www.training.cochrane.org/handbook on 23 June 2020. Google Scholar
    • 23. McGowan JSampson MSalzwedel DMet alPRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol2016;75:40-6. [PMID: 27005575] doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24. Bramer WMGiustini Dde Jonge GBet alDe-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc2016;104:240-3. [PMID: 27366130] doi:10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Sterne JAHernán MAReeves BCet alROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ2016;355:i4919. [PMID: 27733354] doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Parker-Lue SThe impact of reducing pharmaceutical industry payments on physician prescribing. Health Econ2020;29:382-390. [PMID: 31930636] doi:10.1002/hec.3993 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Bandari JTurner RMJacobs BLet alThe relationship of industry payments to prescribing behavior: a study of degarelix and denosumab. Urol Pract2017;4:14-20. [PMID: 28149927] doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2016.03.007 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Murrin S. Open Payments data: review of accuracy, precision, and consistency in reporting. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General; 2018. Report no. OEI-03-15-00220. Accessed at https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-03-15-00220.pdf on 26 September 2019. Google Scholar
    • 29. Ratain MJForecasting unanticipated consequences of “the Sunshine Act”: mostly cloudy. J Clin Oncol2014;32:2293-5. [PMID: 24934789] doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.55.4592 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Fleischman WAgrawal SGross CPet alAssociation of pharmaceutical manufacturer payments to physicians and prescribing dosage of opioids [Letter]. J Gen Intern Med2019;34:1074-1076. [PMID: 31011967] doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04897-9 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Carey C, Lieber EMJ, Miller S. Drug firms' payments and physicians' prescribing behavior in Medicare Part D. National Bureau of Economic Research. February 2020. Accessed at www.nber.org/papers/w26751.pdf on 27 March 2020. Google Scholar
    • 32. Agha L, Zeltzer D. Drug diffusion through peer networks: the influence of industry payments. October 2019. Accessed at www.nber.org/papers/w26338 on 28 September 2020. Google Scholar
    • 33. Brunt CSPhysician characteristics, industry transfers, and pharmaceutical prescribing: empirical evidence from Medicare and the Physician Payment Sunshine Act. Health Serv Res2019;54:636-649. [PMID: 30273976] doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13064 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34. Mitchell APWinn ANDusetzina SBPharmaceutical industry payments and oncologists' selection of targeted cancer therapies in Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA Intern Med2018;178:854-856. [PMID: 29630687] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0776 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Hartung DMJohnston KCohen DMet alIndustry payments to physician specialists who prescribe repository corticotropin. JAMA Netw Open2018;1:e180482. [PMID: 30646086] doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0482 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36. Modi PKWang YKirk PSet alThe receipt of industry payments is associated with prescribing promoted alpha-blockers and overactive bladder medications. Urology2018;117:50-56. [PMID: 29680480] doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.008 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 37. Qian JHansen RASurry Det alDisclosure of industry payments to prescribers: industry payments might be a factor impacting generic drug prescribing. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf2017;26:819-826. [PMID: 28485111] doi:10.1002/pds.4224 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38. DeJong CAguilar TTseng CWet alPharmaceutical industry-sponsored meals and physician prescribing patterns for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA Intern Med2016;176:1114-1122. [PMID: 27322350] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2765 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 39. Hadland SECerdá MLi Yet alAssociation of pharmaceutical industry marketing of opioid products to physicians with subsequent opioid prescribing. JAMA Intern Med2018;178:861-863. [PMID: 29799955] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1999 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 40. Khan RNugent CMScaffidi MAet alAssociation of biologic prescribing for inflammatory bowel disease with industry payments to physicians. JAMA Intern Med2019. [PMID: 31282918] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0999 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 41. Mehta HBMoore TJAlexander GCAssociation of pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians with prescription and Medicare expenditures for pimavanserin. Psychiatr Serv2020:appips202000251. [PMID: 32838675] doi:10.1176/appi.ps.202000251 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42. Mitchell APWinn ANLund JLet alEvaluating the strength of the association between industry payments and prescribing practices in oncology. Oncologist2019;24:632-639. [PMID: 30728276] doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0423 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 43. Orlowski JPWateska LThe effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There's no such thing as a free lunch. Chest1992;102:270-3. [PMID: 1623766] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44. Morse EHanna JMehra SThe association between industry payments and brand-name prescriptions in otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2019;161:605-612. [PMID: 31547772] doi:10.1177/0194599819852321 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 45. Zezza MABachhuber MAPayments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing. PLoS One2018;13:e0209383. [PMID: 30566426] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209383 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 46. Hollander MAGDonohue JMStein BDet alAssociation between opioid prescribing in Medicare and pharmaceutical company gifts by physician specialty. J Gen Intern Med2020;35:2451-2458. [PMID: 31792860] doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05470-0 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 47. Inoue KFigueroa JFOrav EJet alAssociation between industry payments for opioid products and physicians' prescription of opioids: observational study with propensity-score matching. J Epidemiol Community Health2020;74:647-654. [PMID: 32350126] doi:10.1136/jech-2020-214021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 48. Chren MMLandefeld CSPhysicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. JAMA1994;271:684-9. [PMID: 8309031] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 49. Hayes MJPrasad VAssociation between conflict of interest and published position on tumor-treating fields for the treatment of glioblastoma. J Cancer Policy2019;21:100189. doi:10.1016/j.jcpo.2019.100189 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 50. Lundh ALexchin JMintzes Bet alIndustry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2017;2:MR000033. [PMID: 28207928] doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 51. Peppercorn JBlood EWiner Eet alAssociation between pharmaceutical involvement and outcomes in breast cancer clinical trials. Cancer2007;109:1239-46. [PMID: 17326054] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 52. Liang FZhu JMo Met alRole of industry funders in oncology RCTs published in high-impact journals and its association with trial conclusions and time to publication. Ann Oncol2018;29:2129-2134. [PMID: 30084933] doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy305 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 53. Tibau ABedard PLSrikanthan Aet alAuthor financial conflicts of interest, industry funding, and clinical practice guidelines for anticancer drugs. J Clin Oncol2015;33:100-6. [PMID: 25385736] doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.8898 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 54. Greenway TRoss JSUS drug marketing: how does promotion correspond with health value? BMJ2017;357:j1855. [PMID: 28465309] doi:10.1136/bmj.j1855 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 55. Lexchin JThe relation between promotional spending on drugs and their therapeutic gain: a cohort analysis. CMAJ Open2017;5:E724-E728. [PMID: 28912143] doi:10.9778/cmajo.20170089 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 56. Mahr MAHodge DOErie JCAssociation between industry payments and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor use in Medicare beneficiaries. Ophthalmol Retina2017;1:19-24. [PMID: 31047391] doi:10.1016/j.oret.2016.08.001 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 57. Morse EFujiwara RJTMehra SThe association of industry payments to physicians with prescription of brand-name intranasal corticosteroids. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2018;159:442-448. [PMID: 29865931] doi:10.1177/0194599818774739 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 58. Morse EFujiwara RJTMehra SIndustry payments to physicians and prescriptions of brand-name proton-pump inhibitors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2019;160:70-76. [PMID: 30325706] doi:10.1177/0194599818803337 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 59. Rhee TGRoss JSAssociation between industry payments to physicians and gabapentinoid prescribing. JAMA Intern Med2019. [PMID: 31282922] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1082 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 60. Sharma MVadhariya AJohnson MLet alAssociation between industry payments and prescribing costly medications: an observational study using open payments and Medicare Part D data. BMC Health Serv Res2018;18:236. [PMID: 29609611] doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3043-8 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 61. Singh PForman HAdamson ASet alImpact of industry payments on prescribing patterns for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors among Medicare beneficiaries. J Gen Intern Med2019;34:176-178. [PMID: 30324292] doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4698-x CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 62. Singh NChang JSRachitskaya AVOpen Payments database: anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent payments to ophthalmologists. Am J Ophthalmol2017;173:91-97. [PMID: 27697472] doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.026 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 63. Taylor SCHuecker JBGordon MOet alPhysician-industry interactions and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor use among US ophthalmologists. JAMA Ophthalmol2016;134:897-903. [PMID: 27356110] doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1678 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 64. Goupil BBalusson FNaudet Fet alAssociation between gifts from pharmaceutical companies to French general practitioners and their drug prescribing patterns in 2016: retrospective study using the French Transparency in Healthcare and National Health Data System databases. BMJ2019;367:l6015. [PMID: 31690553] doi:10.1136/bmj.l6015 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 65. Carrier M, Shadowen S. Pharmaceutical product hopping: a proposed framework for antitrust analysis. Health Affairs Blog. 1 June 2017. Accessed at www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170601.060360/full on 30 June 2020. Google Scholar
    • 66. Cole ALWood WAMuluneh Bet alComparative safety and health care expenditures among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia initiating first-line imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib. JCO Oncol Pract2020;16:e443-e455. [PMID: 32196424] doi:10.1200/JOP.19.00301 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 67. Treat S. Responses of Rep. Sharon Treat to questions from Senator Kohl. In: Paid to Prescribe? Exploring the Relationship Between Doctors and the Drug Industry. Special Committee on Aging, United States Senate. Serial no. 110-10. US Gov Pr Office; 2007:128-31. Google Scholar
    • 68. Korenstein DKeyhani SRoss JSPhysician attitudes toward industry: a view across the specialties. Arch Surg2010;145:570-7. [PMID: 20566978] doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.75 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 69. Fischer MAKeough MEBaril JLet alPrescribers and pharmaceutical representatives: why are we still meeting? J Gen Intern Med2009;24:795-801. [PMID: 19424764] doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0989-6 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 70. Brett ASBurr WMoloo JAre gifts from pharmaceutical companies ethically problematic? A survey of physicians. Arch Intern Med2003;163:2213-8. [PMID: 14557219] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 71. Halperin ECHutchison PBarrier RCA population-based study of the prevalence and influence of gifts to radiation oncologists from pharmaceutical companies and medical equipment manufacturers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2004;59:1477-83. [PMID: 15275735] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 72. Cain DMDetsky ASEveryone's a little bit biased (even physicians). JAMA2008;299:2893-5. [PMID: 18577735] doi:10.1001/jama.299.24.2893 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 73. Altawalbeh SMIbrahim IAAl-Shatnawi SFInfluence of pharmaceutical promotion on prescribers in Jordan. Int J Clin Pharm2020;42:744-755. [PMID: 32140917] doi:10.1007/s11096-020-01006-3 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 74. Annapureddy A, Minges KE, Henien S, et al. Association between industry payments to physicians and device selection: a report from the NCDR ICD registry [Abstract]. Circulation. 2018;138(Suppl 1). 2018 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, Chicago, Illinois, 10–14 November 2018. Abstract no. 14982. Google Scholar
    • 75. Ayyash OM, Bandari J, Turner RM II, et al. The relationship of physician payments from drug manufacturers to Medicare claims for abiraterone and enzalutamide [Abstract]. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016;10(Suppl 4):S183. Northeastern Section of the American Urological Association 68th Annual Meeting, Buffalo, New York, 29 September–1 October 2016. Abstract no. P64. Google Scholar
    • 76. Ayyash O, Bandari J, Turner R, et al. Small effect of pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians on Medicare prescription habits: using abiraterone and enzalutamide [Abstract]. J Urol. 2017;197(Suppl):e1013. American Association of Urology Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, 12–16 May 2017. Abstract no. MP76-03. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2131 Google Scholar
    • 77. Bandari J, Turner RM II, Jacobs BL, et al. An analysis of industry effects on prescriber behavior: degarelix and denosumab [Abstract]. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016;10(Suppl 4):S179-80. Northeastern Section of the American Urological Association 68th Annual Meeting, Buffalo, New York, 29 September–1 October 2016. Abstract no. P54. Google Scholar
    • 78. Berger JTPharmaceutical industry influences on physician prescribing: gifts, quasi-gifts, and patient-directed gifts. Am J Bioeth2003;3:56-7. [PMID: 14594495] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 79. Bourdette D, Van Leuvin S, Johnston K, et al. Industry payments to neurologists who commonly prescribe repository corticotropin gel (H.P. Acthar) [Abstract]. Neurology. 2017;88(Suppl):P3.400. American Academy of Neurology 69th Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, 22–28 April 2017. Google Scholar
    • 80. Carlat DExploring the link between industry payments to doctors and prescribing habits. BMJ2014;349:g6651. [PMID: 25378357] doi:10.1136/bmj.g6651 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 81. Catricalà AInternational non-proprietary name (INN) prescribing and conflict of interest. Article in Italian. Ricerca & Pratica2007;23:37-8. doi:10.1707/238.2822 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 82. Chua K, Li G, Stahl P, et al. Are industry payments for tadalafil associated with prescribing habits among urologists and primary care physicians? [Abstract]. J Urol. 2019;201(Suppl):e383. American Association of Urology Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, 3–6 May 2019. Abstract no. PD21-03. doi:10.1097/01.JU.0000555747.05854.c6 Google Scholar
    • 83. Duarte-Garcia A, Crowson CS, McCoy R, et al. Association between payments by pharmaceutical manufacturers and prescribing behavior in rheumatology [Abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl):3379-80. 2018 American College of Rheumatology/Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, 19–24 October 2018. Abstract no. 2997. Google Scholar
    • 84. Dyer OIndustry payments to doctors drive surge in gabapentinoid prescribing, study finds. BMJ2019;366:l4672. [PMID: 31300395] doi:10.1136/bmj.l4672 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 85. Eisenberg MDStone EMPittell Het alThe impact of academic medical center policies restricting direct-to-physician marketing on opioid prescribing. Health Aff (Millwood)2020;39:1002-1010. [PMID: 32479218] doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01289 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 86. Eloy JASvider PFBobian Met alIndustry relationships are associated with performing a greater number of sinus balloon dilation procedures. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol2017;7:878-883. [PMID: 28665550] doi:10.1002/alr.21976 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 87. Fleischman WAgrawal SKing Met alAssociation between payments from manufacturers of pharmaceuticals to physicians and regional prescribing: cross sectional ecological study. BMJ2016;354:i4189. [PMID: 27540015] doi:10.1136/bmj.i4189 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 88. Freemantle NJohnson RDennis Jet alSleeping with the enemy? A randomized controlled trial of a collaborative health authority/industry intervention to influence prescribing practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol2000;49:174-9. [PMID: 10671913] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 89. Fujiwara RJTShih AFMehra SCross-sectional analysis of the relationship between paranasal sinus balloon catheter dilations and industry payments among otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2017;157:880-886. [PMID: 28895455] doi:10.1177/0194599817728897 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 90. Glass HEDo clinical grant payment practices in phase 3 clinical trials influence subsequent clinical investigator prescribing behavior? Dis Manag2004;7:77-87. [PMID: 15035835] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 91. Gonzalez-Campoy JMThe physician-industry relationship: lessons from the Minnesota experience. Endocr Pract2009;15:292-7. [PMID: 19502208] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 92. Guo TSriram SManchanda P“Let the Sunshine in”: the impact of industry payment disclosure on physician prescription behavior. Marketing Science2020;39:516-39. doi:10.1287/mksc.2019.1181 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 93. Hadland SERivera-Aguirre AMarshall BDLet alAssociation of pharmaceutical industry marketing of opioid products with mortality from opioid-related overdoses. JAMA Netw Open2019;2:e186007. [PMID: 30657529] doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6007 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 94. Hadland SECerdá MEarlywine JJet alAnalysis of pharmaceutical industry marketing of stimulants, 2014 through 2018. JAMA Pediatr2020;174:385-387. [PMID: 31961384] doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5526 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 95. Hoffman MNPharmaceutical detailing is not for everyone: side effects may include sub-optimal prescribing decisions, compromised patient health, and increased prescription drug spending. J Leg Med2012;33:381-97. [PMID: 22991956] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 96. Humphreys HConflicts of interest for medical practitioners [Letter]. J R Coll Physicians Edinb2020;50:92-95. [PMID: 32539049] doi:10.4997/JRCPE.2020.124 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 97. Ichikawa IClayton EWDoping doctors: the influence of the marketing departments of pharmaceutical companies on physician and researcher behavior in Japan. Account Res2016;23:245-53. [PMID: 26829657] doi:10.1080/08989621.2016.1144478 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 98. Khan R, Nugent CM, Scaffidi MA, et al. Association of biologic prescribing for inflammatory bowel disease with industry payments to physicians [Abstract]. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(Suppl 1):S-606-7. Digestive Disease Week, San Diego, California, 18–21 May 2019. Abstract no. Su1776. doi:10.1016/S0016-5085(19)38413-6 Google Scholar
    • 99. Lee AJBandari JMacleod LCet alConcentration of opioid-related industry payments in opioid crisis areas. J Gen Intern Med2019;34:187-189. [PMID: 30402818] doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4700-7 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 100. Lee A, Ayyash O, Maganty A, et al. Pharmaceutical payments for opioids significantly favor extended-release medication and correlate with physician prescriptions [Abstract]. J Urol. 2019;201(Suppl):e420-1. American Association of Urology Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, 3–6 May 2019. Abstract no. MP29-18. doi:10.1097/01.JU.0000557553.74866.5b Google Scholar
    • 101. Lee A, Ayyash O, Maganty A, et al. Key opinion leaders motivate increased prescriptions among their local physicians [Abstract]. J Urol. 2019;201(Suppl):e628. American Association of Urology Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, 3–6 May 2019. Abstract no. MP44-03. doi:10.1097/01.JU.0000556246.28185.d5 Google Scholar
    • 102. Lichter PRPhysician-industry interactions and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor use among US ophthalmologists. JAMA Ophthalmol2016;134:903-4. [PMID: 27355873] doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1794 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 103. Lo BGrady DPayments to physicians: does the amount of money make a difference? JAMA2017;317:1719-1720. [PMID: 28464150] doi:10.1001/jama.2017.1872 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 104. Marcum ZA, Chang CY, Barthold D, et al. Association between pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians and prescribing of branded memantine and donepezil combination [Abstract]. Value Health. 2020;23(Suppl 1):S272. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes 2020 Conference, 18–20 May 2020. Abstract no. PND69. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.961 Google Scholar
    • 105. Maruf M, Sidana A, Purnell S, et al. Medications for urologic malignancies in the Open Payments data: financial relationships between industry and urologists [Abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl):74. 2017 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, Orlando, Florida, 16–18 February 2017. Abstract no. 74. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.35.6_suppl.74 Google Scholar
    • 106. Maruf MSidana AFleischman Wet alFinancial relationships between urologists and industry: an analysis of Open Payments data. Urol Pract2018;5:180-6. doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2017.03.012 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 107. McCarthy MDoctors who take company cash are more likely to prescribe brand name drugs, analysis finds. BMJ2016;352:i1645. [PMID: 27000964] doi:10.1136/bmj.i1645 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 108. Mitchell AP, Winn A, Dusetzina S. Pharmaceutical industry payments and oncologist drug selection [Abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl):6510. 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, 2–6 June 2017. Abstract no. 6510. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.6510 Google Scholar
    • 109. Mitchell AP, Winn A, Lund JL, et al. Duration of physician-industry relationships and prescribing changes in oncology [Abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(Suppl):6607. 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, 1–5 June 2018. Abstract no. 6607. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.6607 Google Scholar
    • 110. Modi P, Ingham M, Singer E, et al. Pharmaceutical industry payments and physician prescribing of urologic drugs [Abstract]. J Urol. 2017;197(Suppl):e929. American Association of Urology Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, 12–16 May 2017. Abstract no. MP69-08. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2304 Google Scholar
    • 111. Nalleballe KVeerapaneni KDHarada Yet alTrends of industry payments in neurology subspecialties. Cureus2020;12:e9492. [PMID: 32879816] doi:10.7759/cureus.9492 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 112. Olch DIConflict of interest and physician dispensing. Internist1987;28:13-6, 24. [PMID: 10284543] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 113. Pham-Kanter GAlexander GCNair KEffect of physician payment disclosure laws on prescribing [Letter]. Arch Intern Med2012;172:819-21. [PMID: 22636826] doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1210 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 114. Forum. Drug company gifts to GPs may influence prescribing. Pharm Med2020;34:66-7. doi:10.1007/s40290-019-00321-z CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 115. Gifts to doctors wield undue influence in France. Prescrire Int2020;29:135. Google Scholar
    • 116. Rampulla CRelationships between physicians and industry. Rassegna di Patologia dell'Apparato Respiratorio2007;22:253-7. Google Scholar
    • 117. Rodwin MAMedical commerce, physician entrepreneurialism, and conflicts of interest. Camb Q Healthc Ethics2007;16:387-97; discussion 439-42. [PMID: 18018918] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 118. Roehr BPharma gifts associated with higher number and cost of prescriptions written. BMJ2017;359:j4979. [PMID: 29074521] doi:10.1136/bmj.j4979 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 119. Schofferman JBanja JConflicts of interest in pain medicine: practice patterns and relationships with industry. Pain2008;139:494-7. [PMID: 18814969] doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.08.016 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 120. Serhiyenko VRavishanker NVenkatesan RMulti-stage multivariate modeling of temporal patterns in prescription counts for competing drugs in a therapeutic category. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind2018;34:61-78. doi:10.1002/asmb.2232 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 121. Seto B, Juarez D, Singh D. The relationship between pharmaceutical manufacturer funding and prescribing patterns for anticoagulants in the United States [Abstract]. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21(Suppl):S55. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2015, Orlando, Florida, 26–29 October 2015. Abstract no. I23. doi:10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.10.S1 Google Scholar
    • 122. Sharma M, Johnson ML, Vadhariya A, et al. The association of prescriber characteristics with prescriptions for proton pump inhibitors in the Medicare Part D beneficiaries [Abstract]. Value Health. 2016;19:A317. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes 21st Annual International Meeting, Washington, DC, 21–25 May 2016. Abstract no. PG129. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.970 Google Scholar
    • 123. Singh P, Adamson A, Mostaghimi A, et al. Impact of industry payments on prescribing patterns for TNF-alpha inhibitors among Medicare beneficiaries [Abstract]. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138:B6. International Investigative Dermatology 2018 Meeting, Orlando, Florida, 16–19 May 2018. Abstract no. LB1499. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2018.06.029 Google Scholar
    • 124. Somai D, van Dijk L, Verheij R, et al. The effect of pharmaceutical marketing on the prescription of rofecoxib in Dutch general practice [Abstract]. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14(Suppl 1):70. 12th Annual European Public Health Association Meeting, Oslo, Norway, 7–9 October 2004. doi:10.1093/eurpub/14.suppl_1.69 Google Scholar
    • 125. Steinbrook RIndustry payments to physicians: lessons from orthopedic surgery. Comment on “Financial payments by orthopedic device makers to orthopedic surgeons”. Arch Intern Med2011;171:1765-6. [PMID: 22025435] doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.439 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 126. Steinbrook RIndustry payments to physicians and prescribing of brand-name drugs. JAMA Intern Med2016;176:1123. [PMID: 27322808] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2959 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 127. Steinbrook RPhysicians, industry payments for food and beverages, and drug prescribing. JAMA2017;317:1753-1754. [PMID: 28464155] doi:10.1001/jama.2017.2477 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 128. Steinbrook RIndustry payments and physician prescribing. JAMA Intern Med2019;179:1428-9. [PMID: 31282917] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1081 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 129. Taylor RGiles JCash interests taint drug advice. Nature2005;437:1070-1. [PMID: 16237402] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 130. Tsai HJPhysician-industry interactions: there is no such thing as a free lunch [Letter]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol2008;47:252-5. [PMID: 18603524] doi:10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60098-4 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 131. Vogel LPharma freebies for doctors linked to opioid prescribing habits. CMAJ2019;191:E202. [PMID: 30782649] doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-5713 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 132. Yeh JS, Franklin JM, Avorn J, et al. Association of physicians' financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies and their lipid-lowering medication prescribing patterns [Abstract]. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(Suppl 2):S106. 38th Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 22–25 April 2015. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3271-0 Google Scholar
    • 133. Bandari JAyyash OMTurner RMet alThe lack of a relationship between physician payments from drug manufacturers and Medicare claims for abiraterone and enzalutamide. Cancer2017;123:4356-4362. [PMID: 28749536] doi:10.1002/cncr.30914 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 134. Chua KJLi GStahl PJet alReceiving industry payments is associated with prescribing habits of tadalafil. Urol Pract2019;6:282-8. doi:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000017 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 135. Nguyen TAndraka-Christou BSimon Ket alProvider-directed marketing may increase prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat2019;104:104-115. [PMID: 31370974] doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.06.014 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 136. Nguyen TDBradford WDSimon KIPharmaceutical payments to physicians may increase prescribing for opioids. Addiction2019;114:1051-1059. [PMID: 30667135] doi:10.1111/add.14509 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 137. Perlis RHPerlis CSPhysician payments from industry are associated with greater Medicare Part D prescribing costs. PLoS One2016;11:e0155474. [PMID: 27183221] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155474 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 138. Wood SFPodrasky JMcMonagle MAet alInfluence of pharmaceutical marketing on Medicare prescriptions in the District of Columbia. PLoS One2017;12:e0186060. [PMID: 29069085] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186060 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 139. Yeh JSFranklin JMAvorn Jet alAssociation of industry payments to physicians with the prescribing of brand-name statins in Massachusetts. JAMA Intern Med2016;176:763-8. [PMID: 27159336] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1709 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar