Original Research
28 July 2020

Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 173, Number 6
Visual Abstract. SGLT-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for DKA This large, population-based cohort study compares the risk for diabetic ketoacidosis between diabetic patients using sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and those using dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.
Visual Abstract. SGLT-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for DKA
This large, population-based cohort study compares the risk for diabetic ketoacidosis between diabetic patients using sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and those using dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.

Abstract

Background:

Sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors could increase the risk for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).

Objective:

To assess whether SGLT-2 inhibitors, compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, are associated with an increased risk for DKA in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Design:

Population-based cohort study; prevalent new-user design between 2013 and 2018. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04017221)

Setting:

Electronic health care databases from 7 Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom.

Patients:

208 757 new users of SGLT-2 inhibitors were matched by using time-conditional propensity scores to 208 757 recipients of DPP-4 inhibitors.

Measurements:

Cox proportional hazards models estimated site-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of DKA comparing receipt of SGLT-2 inhibitors with receipt of DPP-4 inhibitors, which were pooled by using random-effects models. Secondary analyses were stratified by molecule, age, sex, and prior receipt of insulin.

Results:

Overall, 521 patients were diagnosed with DKA during 370 454 person-years of follow-up (incidence rate per 1000 person-years, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.29 to 1.53]). Compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk for DKA (incidence rate, 2.03 [CI, 1.83 to 2.25] versus 0.75 [CI, 0.63 to 0.89], respectively; HR, 2.85 [CI, 1.99 to 4.08]). Molecule-specific HRs were 1.86 (CI, 1.11 to 3.10) for dapagliflozin, 2.52 (CI, 1.23 to 5.14) for empagliflozin, and 3.58 (CI, 2.13 to 6.03) for canagliflozin. Age and sex did not modify the association; prior receipt of insulin appeared to decrease the risk.

Limitations:

There was unmeasured confounding and no laboratory data were available for the majority of patients, and molecule-specific analyses were conducted at a limited number of sites.

Conclusion:

SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with an almost 3-fold increased risk for DKA, with molecule-specific analyses suggesting a class effect.

Primary Funding Source:

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplemental Material

Supplement. Supplementary Material

References

1.
Tahrani AABarnett AHBailey CJ. SGLT inhibitors in management of diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1:140-51. [PMID: 24622320]  doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70050-0
2.
Neal BPerkovic VMahaffey KWet alCANVAS Program Collaborative Group. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:644-657. [PMID: 28605608]  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925
3.
Wiviott SDRaz IBonaca MPet alDECLARE–TIMI 58 Investigators. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:347-357. [PMID: 30415602]  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389
4.
Zinman BWanner CLachin JMet alEMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117-28. [PMID: 26378978]  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720
5.
Zelniker TAWiviott SDRaz Iet al. SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet. 2019;393:31-39. [PMID: 30424892]  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32590-X
6.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA revises labels of SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes to include warnings about too much acid in the blood and serious urinary tract infections. 15 May 2015. Accessed at www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-revises-labels-sglt2-inhibitors-diabetes-include-warnings-about on 12 May 2019.
7.
Perkovic VJardine MJNeal Bet alCREDENCE Trial Investigators. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2295-2306. [PMID: 30990260]  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744
8.
Fralick MSchneeweiss SPatorno E. Risk of diabetic ketoacidosis after initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor [Letter]. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2300-2302. [PMID: 28591538]  doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1701990
9.
Wang YDesai MRyan PBet al. Incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and other antihyperglycemic agents. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:83-90. [PMID: 28448895]  doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.04.004
10.
Ueda PSvanström HMelbye Met al. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of serious adverse events: nationwide register based cohort study. BMJ. 2018;363:k4365. [PMID: 30429124]  doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4365
11.
Wang LVoss EAWeaver Jet al. Diabetic ketoacidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors versus other antihyperglycemic agents: an observational study of four US administrative claims databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28:1620-1628. [PMID: 31456304]  doi: 10.1002/pds.4887
12.
Kim YGJeon JYHan SJet al. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of ketoacidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1852-1858. [PMID: 29569427]  doi: 10.1111/dom.13297
13.
Suissa SHenry DCaetano Pet alCanadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES). CNODES: the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies. Open Med. 2012;6:e134-40. [PMID: 23687528]
14.
Herrett EGallagher AMBhaskaran Ket al. Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:827-36. [PMID: 26050254]  doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098
15.
Suissa SMoodie EEDell'Aniello S. Prevalent new-user cohort designs for comparative drug effect studies by time-conditional propensity scores. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:459-468. [PMID: 27610604]  doi: 10.1002/pds.4107
16.
Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150-61. [PMID: 20925139]  doi: 10.1002/pst.433
17.
Newcomer JW. Second-generation (atypical) antipsychotics and metabolic effects: a comprehensive literature review. CNS Drugs. 2005;19 Suppl 1:1-93. [PMID: 15998156]
18.
Tamez-Pérez HEQuintanilla-Flores DLRodríguez-Gutiérrez Ret al. Steroid hyperglycemia: prevalence, early detection and therapeutic recommendations. A narrative review. World J Diabetes. 2015;6:1073-81. [PMID: 26240704]  doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i8.1073
19.
DerSimonian RLaird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-88. [PMID: 3802833]
20.
Leslie BRGerwin LETaylor SI. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: lack of a complete history delays diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171:421-426. [PMID: 31525753].  doi: 10.7326/M19-1463
21.
Ferrannini EBaldi SFrascerra Set al. Shift to fatty substrate utilization in response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in subjects without diabetes and patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2016;65:1190-5. [PMID: 26861783]  doi: 10.2337/db15-1356
22.
Faillie JL. Pharmacological aspects of the safety of gliflozins. Pharmacol Res. 2017;118:71-81. [PMID: 27389050]  doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.07.001
23.
Ray WA. Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:915-20. [PMID: 14585769]

Comments

0 Comments
Sign In to Submit A Comment
Neelesh Gupta, Rajkumar Doshi, Rajeev Gupta11 August 2020
The cardiovascular beneficial effects of SGLT2i are minimized Metformin coadministration.

We read with interest Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i) and the Risk for Diabetic Ketoacidosis. A Multicenter Cohort Study by Douros A. and coworkers. It is worth noting that SGLT2i typically produces euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis, unlike typical hyperglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. (1)

SGLT2i are increasingly used in view of their documented cardiovascular benefits, and fixed-dose combination (FDC) pill containing metformin and SGLT2i, is also approved by the US FDA. It is important to note that the cardiovascular protective effects of SGLT2i  (canagliflozin) are minimized when combined with metformin. The risk of CV death and hospitalization reduced by 36% in metformin nonusers versus 12% in metformin users. (p= 0.03). (2) A similar trend is observed with empagliflozin as well. (3)

References:

  1. Donnan K, Segar L. SGLT2 inhibitors and metformin: Dual antihyperglycemic therapy and the risk of metabolic acidosis in type 2 diabetes. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;846:23-29. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.01.002
  1.  Radholm K, Figtree G, Perkovic V, et al. Canagliflozin and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2018;138:458–68.
  1.   Inzucchi, SE, Fitchett, D, Jurišić‐Eržen, D, et al. Are the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of empagliflozin influenced by baseline glucose‐lowering therapy? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020; 22: 631– 639. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13938

 

Disclosures:

The authors have nothing to disclose. 

 

Antonios Douros 1,2, Kristian B. Filion 1,219 August 2020
Response to “The cardiovascular beneficial effects of SGLT2i are minimized with metformin coadministration.”

We thank Dr. Gupta et al. for their interest in our study (1). We agree that the diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors is often euglycemic. However, we were unable to differentiate between euglycemic and hyperglycemic DKA in our study, because this information is not documented in administrative data.

We also agree that there is some evidence of effect modification in the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors, with potentially greater benefits reported among patients not using metformin at baseline than among those using metformin (2, 3). This evidence underscores the importance of considering demographic and clinical characteristics when choosing the most appropriate treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes. Our study adds to the available knowledge base, allowing clinicians and patients to make more informed decisions regarding the benefits and risks of SGLT2 inhibitors.

References

  1. Douros A, Lix LM, Fralick M, et al. Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Ann Intern Med 2020; Jul 28. Online ahead of print. 
  1. Radholm K, Figtree G, Perkovic V, et al. Canagliflozin and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2018;138:458–68.
  1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117-28.

 

Disclosures:

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 173Number 615 September 2020
Pages: 417 - 425

History

Published online: 28 July 2020
Published in issue: 15 September 2020

Keywords

Authors

Affiliations

Antonios Douros, MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6005-4006
McGill University and Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (A.D.)
Lisa M. Lix, PhD
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (L.M.L.)
Michael Fralick, MD, PhD
Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.F.)
Sophie Dell'Aniello, MSc
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (S.D.)
University of Toronto, ICES, and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (B.R.S.)
Paul E. Ronksley, PhD
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (P.E.R.)
Éric Tremblay, BPharm, MSc
Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (É.T.)
Nianping Hu, PhD
The Health Quality Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (N.H.)
Silvia Alessi-Severini, PhD
College of Pharmacy and Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (S.A.)
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.F.)
Shawn C. Bugden, PharmD, MSc
College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, and School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada (S.C.B.)
McGill University and Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (P.E., K.B.F.)
Kristian B. Filion, PhD
McGill University and Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (P.E., K.B.F.)
for the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES) Investigators
Note: This study was made possible through data sharing agreements between the CNODES member research centers and the respective provincial governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba (HIPC 2018/2019-58), Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec, and Saskatchewan. This study was approved by the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (ISAC; protocol # 19_007A2) of the CPRD; the approved protocol was made available to journal reviewers. The British Columbia Ministry of Health (MOH) approved access to and use of British Columbia data for this study. Data sources were as follows (http://www.popdata.bc.ca/data): British Columbia Ministry of Health (creator) (2018): Medical Services Plan (MSP) Payment Information File. BC Ministry of Health (publisher). MOH (2018); British Columbia Ministry of Health (creator) (2018): Consolidation File (MSP Registration & Premium Billing). BC Ministry of Health (publisher). MOH (2018); British Columbia Ministry of Health (creator) (2018): PharmaNet. BC Ministry of Health (publisher). Data Stewardship Committee (2018); and Canadian Institute for Health Information (creator) (2018): Discharge Abstract Database (Hospital Separations). BC Ministry of Health (publisher). MOH (2018). BC Ministry of Health (publisher). MOH (2018); BC Vital Statistics Agency (creator) (2018): Vital Statistics Deaths. V2. BC Ministry of Health (publisher). Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.
Disclaimer: The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors. No endorsement by the provinces, data stewards, ICES, CIHI, or the Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux is intended or should be inferred.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Ms. Audray St-Jean, MSc, and Corine Mizrahi at the CNODES Coordinating Center for their important contributions to this work. They also acknowledge the programming and analytical support of the analysts at each site: Greg Carney, PhD, and Jason Kim, MPH, BHSc (British Columbia); Zhihai Ma, MSc, and Jianguo Zhang, MSc (Alberta); Matthew Dahl, BSc (Manitoba); Yan Wang, MSc, and Steve Doucette, MSc (Nova Scotia); C. Fangyun Wu, MSc, MAcc (Ontario); Jean-Marc Daigle, MSc (Quebec); and Hui Yin, MSc, and Christopher Filliter, MSc (CPRD). Finally, they thank Hala Tamim, PhD, and Vanessa Brunetti, MSc, for their contributions to this study.
Financial Support: CNODES, a collaborating center of the Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network, is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant DSE-146021). This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the MOHLTC. Parts of this material are based on data and/or information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Dr. Filion is supported by a salary support award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec–santé (FRQS) and a William Dawson Scholar award from McGill University. Dr. Lix is supported by a Tier I Canada Research Chair. Dr. Douros is supported by a salary support award from FRQS.
Reproducible Research Statement: Study protocol: Available from Dr. Filion (e-mail, [email protected]). Statistical code and data set: Not available.
Corresponding Author: Kristian B. Filion, PhD, Departments of Medicine and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste-Catherine Road, Suite H410.1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; e-mail, [email protected].
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Douros: Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, 3755 Cote-Ste Catherine Road, Suite 492, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2.
Dr. Lix: University of Manitoba, 753 McDermot Avenue, Third Floor, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 0T6.
Dr. Fralick: Sinai Health System, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5.
Ms. Dell'Aniello: Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, 3755 Cote-Ste Catherine Road, Suite 464, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2.
Dr. Shah: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Room G106, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.
Dr. Ronksley: Teaching Research and Wellness (TRW) Building, 3E18B, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6.
Mr. Tremblay: Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2535 Boulevard Laurier, Fifth Floor, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada G1V 4M3.
Dr. Hu: The Health Quality Council, 241–111 Research Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 3R2.
Dr. Alessi-Severini: College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 750 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 0T5.
Dr. Fisher: University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3.
Dr. Bugden: School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada A1B 3V6.
Dr. Ernst: Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, 3755 Cote-Ste Catherine Road, Suite H415.1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2.
Dr. Filion: Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, 3755 Cote-Ste Catherine Road, Suite H410.1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: A. Douros, L.M. Lix, M. Fralick, S. Dell'Aniello, B.R. Shah, P.E. Ronksley, É. Tremblay, N. Hu, S. Alessi-Severini, A. Fisher, S. Bugden, P. Ernst, K.B. Filion.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: A. Douros, L.M. Lix, M. Fralick, S. Dell'Aniello, B.R. Shah, P.E. Ronksley, É. Tremblay, N. Hu, S. Alessi-Severini, A. Fisher, S. Bugden, P. Ernst, K.B. Filion.
Drafting of the article: A. Douros.
Critical revision for important intellectual content: A. Douros, L.M. Lix, M. Fralick, S. Dell'Aniello, B.R. Shah, P.E. Ronksley, É. Tremblay, N. Hu, S. Alessi-Severini, A. Fisher, S. Bugden, P. Ernst, K.B. Filion.
Final approval of the article: A. Douros, L.M. Lix, M. Fralick, S. Dell'Aniello, B.R. Shah, P.E. Ronksley, É. Tremblay, N. Hu, S. Alessi-Severini, A. Fisher, S. Bugden, P. Ernst, K.B. Filion.
Statistical expertise: L.M. Lix, S. Dell'Aniello.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: S. Dell'Aniello.
Collection and assembly of data: L.M. Lix, S. Dell'Aniello.
This article was published at Annals.org on 28 July 2020.
* For a list of the CNODES Investigators, see the Appendix.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format





Download article citation data for:
Antonios Douros, Lisa M. Lix, Michael Fralick, et al; for the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES) Investigators . Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med.2020;173:417-425. [Epub 28 July 2020]. doi:10.7326/M20-0289

View More

Get Access

Login Options:
Purchase

You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.

Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.

Create your Free Account

You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Related in ACP Journals

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media