Original Research
2 June 2020

Factors Influencing Physician Practices' Adoption of Behavioral Health Integration in the United States: A Qualitative Study

Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 173, Number 2
Visual Abstract. Factors Influencing Adoption of Behavioral Health Integration Mental and substance use disorders are common, but access to behavioral health services is often challenging for patients and their clinicians. Despite financial incentives and the encouragement of professional organizations, efforts to integrate behavioral health clinicians into physician practices have been limited. This study assessed variables that influence physician practices' integration of behavioral health services.
Visual Abstract. Factors Influencing Adoption of Behavioral Health Integration
Mental and substance use disorders are common, but access to behavioral health services is often challenging for patients and their clinicians. Despite financial incentives and the encouragement of professional organizations, efforts to integrate behavioral health clinicians into physician practices have been limited. This study assessed variables that influence physician practices' integration of behavioral health services.

Abstract

Background:

Behavioral health integration is uncommon among U.S. physician practices despite recent policy changes that may encourage its adoption.

Objective:

To describe factors influencing physician practices' implementation of behavioral health integration.

Design:

Semistructured interviews with leaders and clinicians from physician practices that adopted behavioral health integration, supplemented by contextual interviews with experts and vendors in behavioral health integration.

Setting:

30 physician practices, sampled for diversity on specialty, size, affiliation with parent organizations, geographic location, and behavioral health integration model (collaborative or co-located).

Participants:

47 physician practice leaders and clinicians, 20 experts, and 5 vendors.

Measurements:

Qualitative analysis (cyclical coding) of interview transcripts.

Results:

Four overarching factors affecting physician practices' implementation of behavioral health integration were identified. First, practices' motivations for integrating behavioral health care included expanding access to behavioral health services, improving other clinicians' abilities to respond to patients' behavioral health needs, and enhancing practice reputation. Second, practices tailored their implementation of behavioral health integration to local resources, financial incentives, and patient populations. Third, barriers to behavioral health integration included cultural differences and incomplete information flow between behavioral and nonbehavioral health clinicians and billing difficulties. Fourth, practices described the advantages and disadvantages of both fee-for-service and alternative payment models, and few reported positive financial returns.

Limitation:

The practice sample was not nationally representative and excluded practices that did not implement or sustain behavioral health integration, potentially limiting generalizability.

Conclusion:

Practices currently using behavioral health integration face cultural, informational, and financial barriers to implementing and sustaining behavioral health integration. Tailored, context-specific technical support to guide practices' implementation and payment models that improve the business case for practices may enhance the dissemination and long-term sustainability of behavioral health integration.

Primary Funding Source:

American Medical Association and The Commonwealth Fund.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplemental Material

Supplement 1. COREQ Checklist

Supplement 2. Interview Guides

References

1.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results From the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2018.
2.
Wang PSLane MOlfson Met al. Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:629-40. [PMID: 15939840]
3.
Crowley RAKirschner NHealth and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. The integration of care for mental health, substance abuse, and other behavioral health conditions into primary care. Executive summary of an American College of Physicians position paper. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:298-9. [PMID: 26121401].  doi: 10.7326/M15-0510
4.
Gerrity M. Evolving Models of Behavioral Health Integration: Evidence Update 2010-2015. Milbank Memorial Fund; 2016.
5.
Chung HSmali EGoldman MLet al. Evaluation of a Continuum-Based Behavioral Health Integration Framework Among Small Primary Care Practices in New York State: Practice and Policy Findings and Recommendations. United Hospital Fund and New York State Health Foundation; 2019.
6.
Frank RG. Realizing the promise of parity legislation for mental health. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:117-118. [PMID: 27902837]  doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3002
7.
Frank RGGlied SA. Better But Not Well: Mental Health Policy in the United States Since 1950. Johns Hopkins Univ Pr; 2006.
8.
Druss BGGoldman HH. Integrating health and mental health services: a past and future history. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:1199-1204. [PMID: 29690794]  doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18020169
9.
Beronio KGlied SFrank R. How the Affordable Care Act and Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act greatly expand coverage of behavioral health care. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2014;41:410-28. [PMID: 24833486]  doi: 10.1007/s11414-014-9412-0
10.
Press MJHowe RSchoenbaum Met al. Medicare payment for behavioral health integration. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:405-407. [PMID: 27973984]  doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1614134
11.
SAMHSA-HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions. Billing tools: paying for primary care and behavioral health services provided in integrated care settings. Accessed at www.integration.samhsa.gov/financing/billing-tools on 22 December 2019.
12.
Miller BFPetterson SBrownLevey SMet al. Primary care, behavioral health, provider colocation, and rurality. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27:367-74. [PMID: 24808115]  doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130260
13.
Richman ELLombardi Bde Saxe Zerden Let al. Where is Behavioral Health Integration Occurring? Mapping National Co-location Trends Using National Provider Identifier Data. Univ of Michigan School of Public Health; 2018.
14.
Payne GPayne J. Key Concepts in Social Research. Sage; 2004.
15.
Tong ASainsbury PCraig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349-57. [PMID: 17872937]
16.
Chapman EChung HPincus HA. Using a continuum-based framework for behavioral health integration into primary care in New York State. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68:756-758. [PMID: 28712354]  doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700085
17.
Chen PGHarrison MIBergofsky LRet al. Use of internal performance measurement to guide improvement within medical groups. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019;45:487-494. [PMID: 30944069]  doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.02.009
18.
Friedberg MWChen PGWhite Cet al. Effects of health care payment models on physician practice in the United States. Rand Health Q. 2015;5:8. [PMID: 28083361]
19.
Sofaer S. Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? Health Serv Res. 1999;34:1101-18. [PMID: 10591275]
20.
Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. Sage; 2012.
21.
Bao YMcGuire TGChan YFet al. Value-based payment in implementing evidence-based care: the Mental Health Integration Program in Washington State. Am J Manag Care. 2017;23:48-53. [PMID: 28141930]
22.
Cummings NAO'Donohue WTFerguson KE. Behavioral Health as Primary Care: Beyond Efficacy to Effectiveness: A Report of the Third Reno Conference on the Integration of Behavioral Health in Primary Care. Context Pr; 2003.
23.
Melek SPNorris DTPaulus J. Economic Impact of Integrated Medical-Behavioral Healthcare: Implications for Psychiatry. Milliman; 2014.
24.
Unutzer JKaton WJFan MYet al. Long-term cost effects of collaborative care for late-life depression. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14:95-100. [PMID: 18269305]
25.
Carlo ADCorage Baden AMcCarty RLet al. Early health system experiences with collaborative care (CoCM) billing codes: a qualitative study of leadership and support staff. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:2150-2158. [PMID: 31367872]  doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05195-0
26.
Engel CCJaycox LHFreed MCet al. Centrally assisted collaborative telecare for posttraumatic stress disorder and depression among military personnel attending primary care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:948-56. [PMID: 27294447]  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2402
27.
Fortney JCPyne JMEdlund MJet al. A randomized trial of telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1086-93. [PMID: 17492326]
28.
Rockwell KLGilroy AS. Incorporating telemedicine as part of COVID-19 outbreak response systems. Am J Manag Care. 2020;26:147-148. [PMID: 32270980]  doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42784
29.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Telemedicine Health Care Provider Fact Sheet. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2020.
30.
Reed SJShore KKTice JA. Effectiveness and value of integrating behavioral health into primary care. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:691-2. [PMID: 27064485]  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0804

Comments

0 Comments
Sign In to Submit A Comment
Robert C. Smith, MD 8 June 2020
LET’S TAKE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH THE NEXT STEP

The recent article by Malatre-Lansac et al. provided crucial insights about behavioral care in the U.S. (1). Even though collaborative care has been conclusively demonstrated to be successful, the authors nicely underscore, as many have, its lukewarm reception in practices sufficiently interested to try it. The far greater problem with collaborative care is the severe and predicted-to-worsen shortage of psychiatrists. Unhappily, the remedies proposed by the authors, similar to those of others, have been ineffective at a population level. During the last 20 or more years, mental health care has actually worsened according to Healthy People 2020 (2).

What to do?

Medicine’s principles of access, safety, and quality of care cannot give any more ground, now at the break point over the mental health puzzle. We’re at an impasse where nothing of the scope required has worked, many yeoman efforts notwithstanding. Can we tolerate only 25% of mental health patients having access to care—compared to 60-80% for medical problems. Psychiatrists see no more than 15% of all mental health patients, and psychologists also are in short supply, other counselors even less able to function on the frontlines.

Medical physicians now provide 85% of all mental health care, yet they are completely untrained, no more than 2-3% of total training time (medical school and residency) devoted to supervised mental health instruction (3, 4)—even though mental disorders are more common and more disabling than cancer and heart disease combined, the most common health condition we care for.

The only tenable solution at the population level, in my opinion, is one recommended by the Institute of Medicine:  train the physicians who provide the care (5). The idea is not to make everyone a psychiatrist, only that they graduate as competent with mental disorders as with physical diseases. They would then provide care for most common mental disorders (depression, anxiety, prescription drug misuse), still referring difficult problems, the same referral model we use for challenging diseases. The present numbers of psychiatrists and psychologists would support this.

There’s no quick fix, it will take time. Yet, if we’d heeded those in the 1970s advocating a similar major re-direction in medical education, mental disorders and disease problems would receive equal treatment today. There would be no mental health crisis. It’s not too late to begin.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Malatre-Lansac A, Engel CC, Xenakis L, Carlasare L, Blake K, Vargo C, et al. Factors Influencing Physician Practices' Adoption of Behavioral Health Integration in the United States: A Qualitative Study. Ann Intern Med. 2020.
  2. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. Washington, DC: Dept. of Health and Human Services; 2017.
  3. Wang P, Demler O, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler R. Changing profiles of service sectors used for mental health care in the United States. Am.J. Psychiatry. 2006;163:1187-98.
  4. Association of American Medical Colleges. Basic Science, Foundational Knowledge, and Pre-Clerkship Content -- Average Number of Hours for Instruction/Assessment of Curriculum Subjects. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2012.
  5. Institute of Medicine. Improving Medical Education: Enhancing the Behavioral and Social Science Content of Medical School Curricula. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 173Number 221 July 2020
Pages: 92 - 99

History

Published online: 2 June 2020
Published in issue: 21 July 2020

Keywords

Authors

Affiliations

Angèle Malâtre-Lansac, MPA
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.)
Charles C. Engel, MD, MPH
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.)
Lea Xenakis, MPA
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.)
Lindsey Carlasare, MBA
American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois (L.C., K.B., C.V., C.B.)
Kathleen Blake, MD, MPH
American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois (L.C., K.B., C.V., C.B.)
Carol Vargo, MHS
American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois (L.C., K.B., C.V., C.B.)
Christopher Botts, BS
American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois (L.C., K.B., C.V., C.B.)
Peggy G. Chen, MD, MS
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.)
Mark W. Friedberg, MD, MPP
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (M.W.F.)
Disclaimer: The views presented here are those of the authors and should not be attributed to The Commonwealth Fund or its directors, officers, or staff. In addition, the opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and cannot be interpreted as policy of the American Medical Association.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Ms. Chau Pham and RAND's Survey Research Group for their assistance with recruiting and screening physician practices for this study.
Financial Support: By the American Medical Association and The Commonwealth Fund.
Editors' Disclosures: Christine Laine, MD, MPH, Editor in Chief, reports that her spouse has stock options/holdings with Targeted Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Darren B. Taichman, MD, PhD, Executive Editor, reports that he has no financial relationships or interests to disclose. Cynthia D. Mulrow, MD, MSc, Senior Deputy Editor, reports that she has no relationships or interests to disclose. Eliseo Guallar, MD, MPH, DrPH, Deputy Editor, Statistics, reports that he has no financial relationships or interests to disclose. Jaya K. Rao, MD, MHS, Deputy Editor, reports that she has stock holdings/options in Eli Lilly and Pfizer. Christina C. Wee, MD, MPH, Deputy Editor, reports employment with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Sankey V. Williams, MD, Deputy Editor, reports that he has no financial relationships or interests to disclose. Yu-Xiao Yang, MD, MSCE, Deputy Editor, reports that he has no financial relationships or interest to disclose.
Reproducible Research Statement: Study protocol: See Supplement 2. Statistical code: Not applicable. Data set: Not available.
Corresponding Author: Peggy G. Chen, MD, MS, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407; e-mail, [email protected].
Current Author Addresses: Ms. Malâtre-Lansac: Institut Montaigne, 59 rue la Boétie, 75008 Paris, France.
Dr. Engel: RAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Room 9312, Boston, MA 02116-4316.
Ms. Xenakis: RAND Corporation, 315 Montgomery Street, Suite 920, San Francisco, CA 94104.
Ms. Carlasare: American Medical Association, 330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 39300, Chicago, IL 60611.
Dr. Blake, Ms. Vargo, and Mr. Botts: American Medical Association, 25 Massachusetts Avenue NW #600, Washington, DC 20001.
Dr. Chen: RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407.
Dr. Friedberg: 101 Huntington Avenue, Suite 1300, Boston, MA 02199.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: A. Malâtre-Lansac, C.C. Engel, L. Carlasare, K. Blake, C. Vargo, C. Botts, P.G. Chen, M.W. Friedberg.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: A. Malâtre-Lansac, C.C. Engel, P.G. Chen, M.W. Friedberg.
Drafting of the article: A. Malâtre-Lansac, C.C. Engel, L. Carlasare, K. Blake, C. Vargo, P.G. Chen, M.W. Friedberg.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: C.C. Engel, K. Blake, C. Botts, P.G. Chen, M.W. Friedberg.
Final approval of the article: A. Malâtre-Lansac, C.C. Engel, L. Xenakis, L. Carlasare, K. Blake, C. Vargo, C. Botts, P.G. Chen, M.W. Friedberg.
Provision of study materials or patients: C.C. Engel, P.G. Chen.
Statistical expertise: P.G. Chen.
Obtaining of funding: K. Blake, P.G. Chen, M.W. Friedberg.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: L. Xenakis, L. Carlasare, C. Botts, P.G. Chen, M.W. Friedberg.
Collection and assembly of data: A. Malâtre-Lansac, C.C. Engel, P.G. Chen, M.W. Friedberg.
This article was published at Annals.org on 2 June 2020.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format





Download article citation data for:
Angèle Malâtre-Lansac, Charles C. Engel, Lea Xenakis, et al. Factors Influencing Physician Practices' Adoption of Behavioral Health Integration in the United States: A Qualitative Study. Ann Intern Med.2020;173:92-99. [Epub 2 June 2020]. doi:10.7326/M20-0132

View More

Login Options:
Purchase

You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.

Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.

Create your Free Account

You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Related in ACP Journals

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media