Dietary guidelines are promulgated periodically by the U.S. government (for example, reference 1), as well as by other authoritative bodies, with content substantially based on expert review of pertinent biological considerations and the world nutritional epidemiology literature. These sources contribute to widely held beliefs that adherence to dietary guidelines will reduce the risk for major chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes. However, systematic reviews of specific recommended dietary behaviors often conclude that evidence for chronic disease benefits is of low certainty and that any benefits are probably small. Recent examples are provided by systematic reviews of sodium (2), ...

References

  • 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th ed. Accessed at https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines on 17 December 2019. Google Scholar
  • 2. Newberry SJ, Chung M, Anderson CAM, et al. Sodium and Potassium Intake: Effects on Chronic Disease Outcomes and Risks. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 206. (Prepared by the RAND Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00010-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 18-EHC009-EF. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; June 2018. Google Scholar
  • 3. Shin JYXun PNakamura Yet alEgg consumption in relation to risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr2013;98:146-59. [PMID: 23676423] doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.051318 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Johnston BCZeraatkar DHan MAet alUnprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: dietary guideline recommendations from the nutritional recommendations (NutriRECS) consortium. Ann Intern Med2019. [PMID: 31569235]. doi:10.7326/M19-1621 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Brennan LThe nutritional metabolomics crossroads: how to ensure success for dietary biomarkers [Editorial]. Am J Clin Nutr2017;105:293-294. [PMID: 28100510] doi:10.3945/ajcn.116.150847 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Prentice RLPettinger MNeuhouser MLet alApplication of blood concentration biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: example of carotenoid and tocopherol intake in relation to chronic disease risk. Am J Clin Nutr2019;109:1189-1196. [PMID: 30915444] doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy360 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Schoeller DARecent advances from application of doubly labeled water to measurement of human energy expenditure. J Nutr1999;129:1765-8. [PMID: 10498745] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Neuhouser MLTinker LShaw PAet alUse of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol2008;167:1247-59. [PMID: 18344516] doi:10.1093/aje/kwn026 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Prentice RLMossavar-Rahmani YHuang Yet alEvaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol2011;174:591-603. [PMID: 21765003] doi:10.1093/aje/kwr140 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Zheng CBeresford SAVan Horn Let alSimultaneous association of total energy consumption and activity-related energy expenditure with risks of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes among postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol2014;180:526-35. [PMID: 25016533] doi:10.1093/aje/kwu152 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar