Original Research6 August 2019
A Cross-sectional Analysis
    Author, Article and Disclosure Information
    Visual Abstract. Maternal and Fetal Outcomes Among Pregnant Women With SLE

    Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) primarily affects women of child-bearing age. Recent diagnostic and treatment advances have resulted in improved overall survival in patients with SLE, but whether similar improvements in outcomes have occurred among pregnant women with SLE is unclear. This analysis compares trends in pregnancy outcomes over 17 years in a nationwide sample of pregnant women with and without SLE.

    Background:

    Although pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) carries a high risk for mother and fetus, outcomes may be improving.

    Objective:

    To assess nationwide trends and disparities in maternal and fetal complications among pregnant women with SLE.

    Design:

    Retrospective cohort study.

    Setting:

    United States, 1998 to 2015.

    Patients:

    Adult pregnant women with and without SLE who had hospitalizations recorded in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

    Measurements:

    Outcome measures were in-hospital maternal mortality, fetal mortality, preeclampsia or eclampsia, caesarean sections, non–delivery-related admissions, and length of stay. To assess whether trends in outcomes over time differed between patients with SLE and those without SLE, logistic or linear regression with an interaction term between year and SLE (yes or no) was used. Nationwide population estimates incorporating sampling and poststratification weights were obtained.

    Results:

    An estimated 93 820 pregnant women with SLE and 78 045 054 without SLE were hospitalized in the United States from 1998 through 2015. Outcomes improved during those 18 years. In-hospital maternal deaths (per 100 000 admissions) declined among patients with as well as those without SLE (442 vs. 13 for 1998 to 2000 and <50 vs. 10 for 2013 to 2015), although the decrease was greater in women with SLE (difference in trends, P < 0.002). The percentage of patients with SLE in all pregnancy-related, as well as delivery-related, admissions increased significantly.

    Limitations:

    The sample for this analysis was identified by using diagnostic codes; detailed information on hospital-specific trends, SLE disease activity, and medications was not available. Race trends could not be analyzed. Given that NIS uses weighted estimates, the incidence of outcomes reported may not be exact.

    Conclusion:

    In this large study examining SLE and non-SLE pregnancies over 18 years, in-hospital maternal mortality and overall outcomes improved markedly, particularly among women with SLE. However, improvement is still needed, because SLE pregnancy risks remain high.

    Primary Funding Source:

    None.

    References

    • 1. Carter EE Barr SG Clarke AE The global burden of SLE: prevalence, health disparities and socioeconomic impact. Nat Rev Rheumatol2016;12:605-20. [PMID: 27558659] doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.137 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Peart E Clowse ME Systemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy outcomes: an update and review of the literature. Curr Opin Rheumatol2014;26:118-23. [PMID: 24419751] doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000030 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Bundhun PK Soogund MZ Huang F Impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on maternal and fetal outcomes following pregnancy: a meta-analysis of studies published between years 2001–2016. J Autoimmun2017;79:17-27. [PMID: 28256367] doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2017.02.009 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Goss LB Ortiz JR Okamura DM et alSignificant reductions in mortality in hospitalized patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Washington state from 2003 to 2011. PLoS One2015;10:e0128920. [PMID: 26087254] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128920 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Madazli R Bulut B Erenel H et alSystemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol2010;30:17-20. [PMID: 20121497] doi:10.3109/01443610903315678 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Clark CA Spitzer KA Laskin CA Decrease in pregnancy loss rates in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus over a 40-year period. J Rheumatol2005;32:1709-12. [PMID: 16142865] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Carvalheiras G Vita P Marta S et alPregnancy and systemic lupus erythematosus: review of clinical features and outcome of 51 pregnancies at a single institution. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol2010;38:302-6. [PMID: 19603147] doi:10.1007/s12016-009-8161-y CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Lateef A Petri M Management of pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol2012;8:710-8. [PMID: 22907290] doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2012.133 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Ruiz-Irastorza G Khamashta MA Gordon C et alMeasuring systemic lupus erythematosus activity during pregnancy: validation of the lupus activity index in pregnancy scale. Arthritis Rheum2004;51:78-82. [PMID: 14872459] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Buyon JP Kim MY Guerra MM et alPredictors of pregnancy outcomes in patients with lupUS: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med2015;163:153-63. [PMID: 26098843]. doi:10.7326/M14-2235 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Lockshin MD Reinitz E Druzin ML et alLupus pregnancy. Case-control prospective study demonstrating absence of lupus exacerbation during or after pregnancy. Am J Med1984;77:893-8. [PMID: 6496544] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Buyon JP Cronstein BN Morris M et alSerum complement values (C3 and C4) to differentiate between systemic lupus activity and pre-eclampsia. Am J Med1986;81:194-200. [PMID: 3740078] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Buyon JP Kalunian KC Ramsey-Goldman R et alAssessing disease activity in SLE patients during pregnancy. Lupus1999;8:677-84. [PMID: 10568906] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Fessler BJ Alarcón GS McGwin G Jr et alLUMINA Study GroupSystemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups: XVI. Association of hydroxychloroquine use with reduced risk of damage accrual. Arthritis Rheum2005;52:1473-80. [PMID: 15880829] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. van Vollenhoven RF Mosca M Bertsias G et alTreat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus: recommendations from an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis2014;73:958-67. [PMID: 24739325] doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205139 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Clowse ME Jamison M Myers E et alA national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol2008;199:127. [PMID: 18456233] doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.012 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Andrade SE Scott PE Davis RL et alValidity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf2013;22:7-15. [PMID: 22753079] doi:10.1002/pds.3319 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Khera R Angraal S Couch T et alAdherence to methodological standards in research using the National Inpatient Sample. JAMA2017;318:2011-2018. [PMID: 29183077] doi:10.1001/jama.2017.17653 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Trend Weights for HCUP NIS Data. Accessed at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/trendwghts.jsp on 22 February 2019. Google Scholar
    • 20. Kwok LW Tam LS Zhu T et alPredictors of maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus2011;20:829-36. [PMID: 21543513] doi:10.1177/0961203310397967 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Bramham K Hunt BJ Bewley S et alPregnancy outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus with and without previous nephritis. J Rheumatol2011;38:1906-13. [PMID: 21632681] doi:10.3899/jrheum.100997 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Yen EY Shaheen M Woo JMP et al46-year trends in systemic lupus erythematosus mortality in the United States, 1968 to 2013: a nationwide population-based study. Ann Intern Med2017;167:777-785. [PMID: 29086801]. doi:10.7326/M17-0102 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Jorge A Wallace ZS Zhang Y et alAll-cause and cause-specific mortality trends of end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis from 1995 to 2014. Arthritis Rheumatol2019;71:403-410. [PMID: 30225916] doi:10.1002/art.40729 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24. Smyth A Oliveira GH Lahr BD et alA systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2010;5:2060-8. [PMID: 20688887] doi:10.2215/CJN.00240110 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Shibata S Sasaki T Hirabayashi Y et alRisk factors in the pregnancy of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: association of hypocomplementaemia with poor prognosis. Ann Rheum Dis1992;51:619-23. [PMID: 1616326] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Harris EN Gharavi AE Boey ML et alAnticardiolipin antibodies: detection by radioimmunoassay and association with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet1983;2:1211-4. [PMID: 6139567] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Lockshin MD Druzin ML Goei S et alAntibody to cardiolipin as a predictor of fetal distress or death in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med1985;313:152-6. [PMID: 3925336] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Salmon JE Girardi G Lockshin MD The antiphospholipid syndrome as a disorder initiated by inflammation: implications for the therapy of pregnant patients. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol2007;3:140-7; quiz 1 p following 187. [PMID: 17334336] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Lockshin MD Anticoagulation in management of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in pregnancy. Clin Lab Med2013;33:367-76. [PMID: 23702124] doi:10.1016/j.cll.2013.01.001 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Levy RA Vilela VS Cataldo MJ et alHydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in lupus pregnancy: double-blind and placebo-controlled study. Lupus2001;10:401-4. [PMID: 11434574] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Osterman MJ Martin JA Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep2014;63:1-16. [PMID: 25383560] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32. Petri M Daly RP Pushparajah DS Healthcare costs of pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus: retrospective observational analysis from a US health claims database. J Med Econ2015;18:967-73. [PMID: 26121160] doi:10.3111/13696998.2015.1066796 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33. MacDorman MF Matthews TJ Declercq E Trends in out-of-hospital births in the United States, 1990-2012. NCHS Data Brief2014:1-8. [PMID: 24594003] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34. GBD 2015 Maternal Mortality CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet2016;388:1775-1812. [PMID: 27733286] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31470-2 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar