Original Research19 September 2017
A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial
    Author, Article and Disclosure Information
    Background:

    The public health significance of the reported higher incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering is unclear.

    Objective:

    To examine the effects of intensive SBP lowering on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes and contrast its apparent beneficial and adverse effects.

    Design:

    Subgroup analyses of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01206062)

    Setting:

    Adults with high blood pressure and elevated cardiovascular risk.

    Participants:

    6662 participants with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

    Intervention:

    Random assignment to an intensive or standard SBP goal (120 or 140 mm Hg, respectively).

    Measurements:

    Differences in mean eGFR during follow-up (estimated with a linear mixed-effects model), prespecified incident CKD (defined as a >30% decrease in eGFR to a value <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and a composite of all-cause death or cardiovascular event, with surveillance every 3 months.

    Results:

    The difference in adjusted mean eGFR between the intensive and standard groups was −3.32 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, −3.90 to −2.74 mL/min/1.73 m2) at 6 months, was −4.50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CI, −5.16 to −3.85 mL/min/1.73 m2) at 18 months, and remained relatively stable thereafter. An incident CKD event occurred in 3.7% of participants in the intensive group and 1.0% in the standard group at 3-year follow-up, with a hazard ratio of 3.54 (CI, 2.50 to 5.02). The corresponding percentages for the composite of death or cardiovascular event were 4.9% and 7.1% at 3-year follow-up, with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (CI, 0.59 to 0.86).

    Limitation:

    Long-term data were lacking.

    Conclusion:

    Intensive SBP lowering increased risk for incident CKD events, but this was outweighed by cardiovascular and all-cause mortality benefits.

    Primary Funding Source:

    National Institutes of Health.

    References

    • 1. Mills KT Bundy JD Kelly TN Reed JE Kearney PM Reynolds K et alGlobal disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation2016;134:441-50. [PMID: 27502908] doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018912 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. James PA Oparil S Carter BL Cushman WC Dennison-Himmelfarb C Handler J et al2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA2014;311:507-20. [PMID: 24352797] doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284427 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Hsu CY McCulloch CE Darbinian J Go AS Iribarren C Elevated blood pressure and risk of end-stage renal disease in subjects without baseline kidney disease. Arch Intern Med2005;165:923-8. [PMID: 15851645] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Rapsomaniki E Timmis A George J Pujades-Rodriguez M Shah AD Denaxas S et alBlood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet2014;383:1899-911. [PMID: 24881994] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60685-1 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Lewington S Clarke R Qizilbash N Peto R Collins R Prospective Studies CollaborationAge-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet2002;360:1903-13. [PMID: 12493255] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Yoon SS, Burt V, Louis T, Carroll MS. Hypertension Among Adults in the United States, 2009–2010. NCHS Data Brief no. 107. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; October 2012. Accessed at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db107.pdf on 4 May 2017. Google Scholar
    • 7. Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H. An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States. Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; May 2014. Accessed at www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf on 4 May 2016. Google Scholar
    • 8. Wright JT Jr Fine LJ Lackland DT Ogedegbe G Dennison Himmelfarb CR Evidence supporting a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 150 mm Hg in patients aged 60 years or older: the minority view. Ann Intern Med2014;160:499-503. [PMID: 24424788]. doi:10.7326/M13-2981 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Wright JT Jr Williamson JD Whelton PK Snyder JK Sink KM Rocco MV et alSPRINT Research GroupA randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med2015;373:2103-16. [PMID: 26551272] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1511939 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Ambrosius WT Sink KM Foy CG Berlowitz DR Cheung AK Cushman WC et alSPRINT Study Research GroupThe design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Clin Trials2014;11:532-46. [PMID: 24902920] doi:10.1177/1740774514537404 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Protocol Version 4.0. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 1 November 2012. Accessed at www.sprinttrial.org/public/Protocol_Current.pdf on 20 March 2016. Google Scholar
    • 12. D'Agostino RB Sr Vasan RS Pencina MJ Wolf PA Cobain M Massaro JM et alGeneral cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation2008;117:743-53. [PMID: 18212285] doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Levey AS Bosch JP Lewis JB Greene T Rogers N Roth D A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med1999;130:461-70. [PMID: 10075613]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Fine JP Gray RJ A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc1999;94:496-509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Hommel G A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika1988;75:383-6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Altman DG Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ1998;317:1309-12. [PMID: 9804726] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Palmer BF Renal dysfunction complicating the treatment of hypertension. N Engl J Med2002;347:1256-61. [PMID: 12393824] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Cushman WC Evans GW Byington RP Goff DC Jr Grimm RH Jr Cutler JA et alACCORD Study GroupEffects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med2010;362:1575-85. [PMID: 20228401] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1001286 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Peralta CA McClure LA Scherzer R Odden MC White CL Shlipak M et alEffect of intensive versus usual blood pressure control on kidney function among individuals with prior lacunar stroke: a post hoc analysis of the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) randomized trial. Circulation2016;133:584-91. [PMID: 26762524] doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019657 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Appel LJ Wright JT Jr Greene T Agodoa LY Astor BC Bakris GL et alAASK Collaborative Research GroupIntensive blood-pressure control in hypertensive chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med2010;363:918-29. [PMID: 20818902] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0910975 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Sarnak MJ Greene T Wang X Beck G Kusek JW Collins AJ et alThe effect of a lower target blood pressure on the progression of kidney disease: long-term follow-up of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. Ann Intern Med2005;142:342-51. [PMID: 15738453]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00009 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Toto RD Mitchell HC Lee HC Milam C Pettinger WA Reversible renal insufficiency due to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Ann Intern Med1991;115:513-9. [PMID: 1883120]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-7-513 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Holtkamp FA de Zeeuw D Thomas MC Cooper ME de Graeff PA Hillege HJ et alAn acute fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate during treatment with losartan predicts a slower decrease in long-term renal function. Kidney Int2011;80:282-7. [PMID: 21451458] doi:10.1038/ki.2011.79 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24. Short-term effects of protein intake, blood pressure, and antihypertensive therapy on glomerular filtration rate in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. J Am Soc Nephrol1996;7:2097-109. [PMID: 8915969] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Lancet2000;355:253-9. [PMID: 10675071] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Brenner BM Cooper ME de Zeeuw D Keane WF Mitch WE Parving HH et alRENAAL Study InvestigatorsEffects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med2001;345:861-9. [PMID: 11565518] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Go AS Chertow GM Fan D McCulloch CE Hsu CY Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med2004;351:1296-305. [PMID: 15385656] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar