Reviews21 February 2017
A Systematic Review
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
    Background:

    The relationship between sugar and health is affected by energy balance, macronutrient substitutions, and diet and lifestyle patterns. Several authoritative organizations have issued public health guidelines addressing dietary sugars.

    Purpose:

    To systematically review guidelines on sugar intake and assess consistency of recommendations, methodological quality of guidelines, and the quality of evidence supporting each recommendation.

    Data Sources:

    MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science (1995 to September 2016); guideline registries; and gray literature (bibliographies, Google, and experts).

    Study Selection:

    Guidelines addressing sugar intake that reported their methods of development and were published in English between 1995 and 2016.

    Data Extraction:

    Three reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition (AGREE II), instrument. To assess evidence quality, articles supporting recommendations were independently reviewed and their quality was determined by using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods.

    Data Synthesis:

    The search identified 9 guidelines that offered 12 recommendations. Each of the reviewed guidelines indicated a suggested decrease in the consumption of foods containing nonintrinsic sugars. The guidelines scored poorly on AGREE II criteria, specifically in rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence. Seven recommendations provided nonquantitative guidance; 5 recommended less than 25% to less than 5% of total calories from nonintrinsic sugars. The recommendations were based on various health concerns, including nutrient displacement, dental caries, and weight gain. Quality of evidence supporting recommendations was low to very low.

    Limitation:

    The authors conducted the study independent of the funding source, which is primarily supported by the food and agriculture industry.

    Conclusion:

    Guidelines on dietary sugar do not meet criteria for trustworthy recommendations and are based on low-quality evidence. Public health officials (when promulgating these recommendations) and their public audience (when considering dietary behavior) should be aware of these limitations.

    Primary Funding Source:

    Technical Committee on Dietary Carbohydrates of the North American branch of the International Life Sciences Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42015029182)

    References

    • 1. Ruxton CHGardner EJMcNulty HMIs sugar consumption detrimental to health? A review of the evidence 1995–2006. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr2010;50:1-19. [PMID: 20047137] doi:10.1080/10408390802248569 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Hess JLatulippe MEAyoob KSlavin JThe confusing world of dietary sugars: definitions, intakes, food sources and international dietary recommendations. Food Funct2012;3:477-86. [PMID: 22402777] doi:10.1039/c2fo10250a CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Erickson JSlavin JTotal, added, and free sugars: are restrictive guidelines science-based or achievable? Nutrients2015;7:2866-78. [PMID: 25884659] doi:10.3390/nu7042866 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. World Health OrganizationGuideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Google Scholar
    • 5. Public Health England, Scientific Advisory Committee on NutritionCarbohydrates and Health. London: Public Health England; 2015. Google Scholar
    • 6. U.S. Department of AgricultureU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesDietary Guidelines for Americans, 2015–2020. 8th ed. Washington, DC: US Gov Pr Off; 2015. Google Scholar
    • 7. Sadeghirad B, Erickson J, Lytvyn L, Webber-Adams T, Slavin J, Johnston B. Scientific basis for recommendations on sugars from authoritative health organizations: a systematic review of public health guidelines. PROSPERO: CRD42015029182. Accessed at www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42015029182 on 16 November 2016. Google Scholar
    • 8. AGREE CollaborationDevelopment and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care2003;12:18-23. [PMID: 12571340] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Guyatt GHOxman ADVist GEKunz RFalck-Ytter YAlonso-Coello Pet alGRADE Working GroupGRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ2008;336:924-6. [PMID: 18436948] doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Cohen JWeighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull1968;70:213-20. [PMID: 19673146] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Koch GIntraclass correlation coefficient.. In: Kotz S, Read C, Balakrishnan N, Vidakovic B, eds. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. 4th ed. New York: J Wiley; 1982:213-7. Google Scholar
    • 12. Kramer MSFeinstein ARClinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther1981;29:111-23. [PMID: 7460469] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition BoardDietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2002. Google Scholar
    • 14. Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012: Integrating Nutrition and Physical Activity. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd; 2012. Google Scholar
    • 15. Ministry of Health of Brazil, Secretariat of Health Care, Primary Health Care DepartmentDietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. Brasilia, DF, Brazil: Ministry of Health of Brazil; 2014. Google Scholar
    • 16. Hauner HBechthold ABoeing HBrönstrup ABuyken ALeschik-Bonnet Eet alGerman Nutrition SocietyEvidence-based guideline of the German Nutrition Society: carbohydrate intake and prevention of nutrition-related diseases. Ann Nutr Metab2012;60 Suppl 1:1-58. [PMID: 22286913] doi:10.1159/000335326 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Food Safety Authority of IrelandScientific Recommendations for Healthy Eating Guidelines in Ireland. Dublin: Food Safety Authority of Ireland; 2011. Google Scholar
    • 18. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Dietary Guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2013. Accessed at www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/n55 on 16 November 2016. Google Scholar
    • 19. Becker WNordic Nutrition Recommendations 2004, based on scientific evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition2005;49:68-71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Brouwers MCKho MEBrowman GPBurgers JSCluzeau FFeder Get alAGREE Next Steps ConsortiumAGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ2010;182:E839-42. [PMID: 20603348] doi:10.1503/cmaj.090449 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Chen LAppel LJLoria CLin PHChampagne CMElmer PJet alReduction in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with weight loss: the PREMIER trial. Am J Clin Nutr2009;89:1299-306. [PMID: 19339405] doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27240 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Sichieri RPaulaTrotte Ade Souza RAVeiga GVSchool randomised trial on prevention of excessive weight gain by discouraging students from drinking sodas. Public Health Nutr2009;12:197-202. [PMID: 18559131] doi:10.1017/S1368980008002644 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Tucker KLMorita KQiao NHannan MTCupples LAKiel DPColas, but not other carbonated beverages, are associated with low bone mineral density in older women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study. Am J Clin Nutr2006;84:936-42. [PMID: 17023723] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24. Duffey KJGordon-Larsen PSteffen LMJacobs DRPopkin BMDrinking caloric beverages increases the risk of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr2010;92:954-9. [PMID: 20702604] doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.29478 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Cohen LCurhan GForman JAssociation of sweetened beverage intake with incident hypertension. J Gen Intern Med2012;27:1127-34. [PMID: 22539069] doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2069-6 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Nissinen KMikkilä VMännistö SLahti-Koski MRäsänen LViikari Jet alSweets and sugar-sweetened soft drink intake in childhood in relation to adult BMI and overweight. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Public Health Nutr2009;12:2018-26. [PMID: 19476678] doi:10.1017/S1368980009005849 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Dhingra RSullivan LJacques PFWang TJFox CSMeigs JBet alSoft drink consumption and risk of developing cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults in the community. Circulation2007;116:480-8. [PMID: 17646581] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Paynter NPYeh HCVoutilainen SSchmidt MIHeiss GFolsom ARet alCoffee and sweetened beverage consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Am J Epidemiol2006;164:1075-84. [PMID: 16982672] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Palmer JRBoggs DAKrishnan SHu FBSinger MRosenberg LSugar-sweetened beverages and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American women. Arch Intern Med2008;168:1487-92. [PMID: 18663160] doi:10.1001/archinte.168.14.1487 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Schulze MBManson JELudwig DSColditz GAStampfer MJWillett WCet alSugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. JAMA2004;292:927-34. [PMID: 15328324] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesScientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2015. Google Scholar
    • 32. Moynihan PJKelly SAEffect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. J Dent Res2014;93:8-18. [PMID: 24323509] doi:10.1177/0022034513508954 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33. Te Morenga LMallard SMann JDietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ2012;346:e7492. [PMID: 23321486] doi:10.1136/bmj.e7492 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34. Andrews JCSchünemann HJOxman ADPottie KMeerpohl JJCoello PAet alGRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol2013;66:726-35. [PMID: 23570745] doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Council on School HealthSnacks, sweetened beverages, added sugars, and schools. Pediatrics2015;135:575-83. [PMID: 25713277] doi:10.1542/peds.2014-3902 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and AllergiesScientific opinion on dietary reference values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre. EFSA Journal2010;8:1462. Google Scholar
    • 37. Johnson RKAppel LJBrands MHoward BVLefevre MLustig RHet alAmerican Heart Association Nutrition Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism and the Council on Epidemiology and PreventionDietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2009;120:1011-20. [PMID: 19704096] doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192627 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38. National Institute of NutritionDietary Guidelines for Indians: A Manual. 2nd ed. Hyderabad, India: National Institute of Nutrition; 2011. Google Scholar
    • 39. GRADE Working Group Web site. Accessed at http://gradeworkinggroup.org on 19 October 2016. Google Scholar
    • 40. Greenfield SSteinberg EAuerbach AAvorn JGalvin RGibbons Ret alClinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2011. Google Scholar
    • 41. Forshee RAAnderson PAStorey MLSugar-sweetened beverages and body mass index in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr2008;87:1662-71. [PMID: 18541554] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42. Gibson SSugar-sweetened soft drinks and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence from observational studies and interventions. Nutr Res Rev2008;21:134-47. [PMID: 19087367] doi:10.1017/S0954422408110976 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 43. Malik VSSchulze MBHu FBIntake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr2006;84:274-88. [PMID: 16895873] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44. Vartanian LRSchwartz MBBrownell KDEffects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health2007;97:667-75. [PMID: 17329656] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 45. Wolff EDansinger MLSoft drinks and weight gain: how strong is the link? Medscape J Med2008;10:189. [PMID: 18924641] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 46. Anderson CACurzon MEVan Loveren CTatsi CDuggal MSSucrose and dental caries: a review of the evidence. Obes Rev2009;10 Suppl 1:41-54. [PMID: 19207535] doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00564.x CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 47. Sonestedt EOverby NCLaaksonen DEBirgisdottir BEDoes high sugar consumption exacerbate cardiometabolic risk factors and increase the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease? Food Nutr Res2012;56. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 48. Zhang YHAn TZhang RCZhou QHuang YZhang JVery high fructose intake increases serum LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol: a meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. J Nutr2013;143:1391-8. [PMID: 23825185] doi:10.3945/jn.113.175323 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 49. Malik VSPopkin BMBray GADesprés JPWillett WCHu FBSugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care2010;33:2477-83. [PMID: 20693348] doi:10.2337/dc10-1079 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 50. Fogelholm MAnderssen SGunnarsdottir ILahti-Koski MDietary macronutrients and food consumption as determinants of long-term weight change in adult populations: a systematic literature review. Food Nutr Res2012;56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 51. Burt BAPai SSugar consumption and caries risk: a systematic review. J Dent Educ2001;65:1017-23. [PMID: 11699972] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 52. Mattes RDShikany JMKaiser KAAllison DBNutritively sweetened beverage consumption and body weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Obes Rev2011;12:346-65. [PMID: 20524996] doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00755.x CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 53. Nutritional Epidemiology Group, University of Leeds. A systematic review of the evidence of the benefits and risks of different dietary carbohydrates on cardio-metabolic health and disease. July 2012. Accessed at www.nutritionsociety.org/sites/www.nutritionsociety.org/files/02%20-%20Cardiometabolic%20Health%20Report%20Introduction.pdf on 16 November 2016. Google Scholar