Original Research1 November 2016
A Randomized Trial
    Author, Article and Disclosure Information

    Background:

    To date, evidence for the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been limited to case series and open-label clinical trials.

    Objective:

    To determine the efficacy and safety of FMT for treatment of recurrent CDI.

    Design:

    Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01703494)

    Setting:

    Two academic medical centers.

    Patients:

    46 patients who had 3 or more recurrences of CDI and received a full course of vancomycin for their most recent acute episode.

    Intervention:

    Fecal microbiota transplantation with donor stool (heterologous) or patient's own stool (autologous) administered by colonoscopy.

    Measurements:

    The primary end point was resolution of diarrhea without the need for further anti-CDI therapy during the 8-week follow-up. Safety data were compared between treatment groups via review of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and new medical conditions for 6 months after FMT. Fecal microbiota analyses were performed on patients' stool before and after FMT and also on donors' stool.

    Results:

    In the intention-to-treat analysis, 20 of 22 patients (90.9%) in the donor FMT group achieved clinical cure compared with 15 of 24 (62.5%) in the autologous FMT group ( P  = 0.042). Resolution after autologous FMT differed by site (9 of 10 vs. 6 of 14 [P = 0.033]). All 9 patients who developed recurrent CDI after autologous FMT were free of further CDI after subsequent donor FMT. There were no SAEs related to FMT. Donor FMT restored gut bacterial community diversity and composition to resemble that of healthy donors.

    Limitation:

    The study included only patients who had 3 or more recurrences and excluded those who were immunocompromised and aged 75 years or older.

    Conclusion:

    Donor stool administered via colonoscopy seemed safe and was more efficacious than autologous FMT in preventing further CDI episodes.

    Primary Funding Source:

    National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

    References

    • 1. Lessa FC Mu Y Bamberg WM Beldavs ZG Dumyati GK Dunn JR et alBurden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med2015;372:825-34. [PMID: 25714160] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408913 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Cohen SH Gerding DN Johnson S Kelly CP Loo VG McDonald LC et alSociety for Healthcare Epidemiology of AmericaClinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2010;31:431-55. [PMID: 20307191] doi:10.1086/651706 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Surawicz CM Brandt LJ Binion DG Ananthakrishnan AN Curry SR Gilligan PH et alGuidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol2013;108:478-98. [PMID: 23439232] doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.4 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. McFarland LV Elmer GW , and  Surawicz CM Breaking the cycle: treatment strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease. Am J Gastroenterol2002;97:1769-75. [PMID: 12135033] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. McFarland LV Surawicz CM Rubin M Fekety R Elmer GW , and  Greenberg RN Recurrent Clostridium difficile disease: epidemiology and clinical characteristics. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1999;20:43-50. [PMID: 9927265] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Chang JY Antonopoulos DA Kalra A Tonelli A Khalife WT Schmidt TM et alDecreased diversity of the fecal microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Infect Dis2008;197:435-8. [PMID: 18199029] doi:10.1086/525047 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Gough E Shaikh H , and  Manges AR Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis2011;53:994-1002. [PMID: 22002980] doi:10.1093/cid/cir632 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Guo B Harstall C Louie T Veldhuyzen van Zanten S , and  Dieleman LA Systematic review: faecal transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2012;35:865-75. [PMID: 22360412] doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05033.x CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Kassam Z Lee CH Yuan Y , and  Hunt RH Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol2013;108:500-8. [PMID: 23511459] doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.59 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. van Nood E Vrieze A Nieuwdorp M Fuentes S Zoetendal EG de Vos WM et alDuodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med2013;368:407-15. [PMID: 23323867] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1205037 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Cammarota G Masucci L Ianiro G Bibbò S Dinoi G Costamagna G et alRandomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy vs. vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2015;41:835-43. [PMID: 25728808] doi:10.1111/apt.13144 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Lee CH Steiner T Petrof EO Smieja M Roscoe D Nematallah A et alFrozen vs fresh fecal microbiota transplantation and clinical resolution of diarrhea in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA2016;315:142-9. [PMID: 26757463] doi:10.1001/jama.2015.18098 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Baxter M Ahmad T Colville A , and  Sheridan R Fatal aspiration pneumonia as a complication of fecal microbiota transplant [Letter]. Clin Infect Dis2015;61:136-7. [PMID: 25805303] doi:10.1093/cid/civ247 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Zipursky JS Sidorsky TI Freedman CA Sidorsky MN , and  Kirkland KB Patient attitudes toward the use of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis2012;55:1652-8. [PMID: 22990849] doi:10.1093/cid/cis809 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Koo HL Van JN Zhao M Ye X Revell PA Jiang ZD et alReal-time polymerase chain reaction detection of asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization and rising C. difficile-associated disease rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2014;35:667-73. [PMID: 24799643] doi:10.1086/676433 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Wilcox MH Planche T Fang FC , and  Gilligan P What is the current role of algorithmic approaches for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection? J Clin Microbiol2010;48:4347-53. [PMID: 20980568] doi:10.1128/JCM.02028-10 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Schloss PD Westcott SL Ryabin T Hall JR Hartmann M Hollister EB et alIntroducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol2009;75:7537-41. [PMID: 19801464] doi:10.1128/AEM.01541-09 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Acar EF  and  Sun L A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test incorporating group uncertainty with application to genetic association studies. Biometrics2013;69:427-35. [PMID: 23441822] doi:10.1111/biom.12006 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Gerding DN Meyer T Lee C Cohen SH Murthy UK Poirier A et alAdministration of spores of nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strain M3 for prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA2015;313:1719-27. [PMID: 25942722] doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3725 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Piche T Vanbiervliet G Pipau FG Dainese R Hébuterne X Rampal P et alLow risk of irritable bowel syndrome after Clostridium difficile infection. Can J Gastroenterol2007;21:727-31. [PMID: 18026576] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Pimentel M Lembo A Chey WD Zakko S Ringel Y Yu J et alTARGET Study GroupRifaximin therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome without constipation. N Engl J Med2011;364:22-32. [PMID: 21208106] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1004409 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Hamilton MJ Weingarden AR Unno T Khoruts A , and  Sadowsky MJ High-throughput DNA sequence analysis reveals stable engraftment of gut microbiota following transplantation of previously frozen fecal bacteria. Gut Microbes2013;4:125-35. [PMID: 23333862] doi:10.4161/gmic.23571 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Shankar V Hamilton MJ Khoruts A Kilburn A Unno T Paliy O et alSpecies and genus level resolution analysis of gut microbiota in Clostridium difficile patients following fecal microbiota transplantation. Microbiome2014;2:13. [PMID: 24855561] doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-13 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24. Brandt LJ Aroniadis OC Mellow M Kanatzar A Kelly C Park T et alLong-term follow-up of colonoscopic fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Gastroenterol2012;107:1079-87. [PMID: 22450732] doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.60 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Agrawal M Aroniadis OC Brandt LJ Kelly C Freeman S Surawicz C et alThe long-term efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent, severe, and complicated Clostridium difficile infection in 146 elderly individuals. J Clin Gastroenterol2016;50:403-7. [PMID: 26352106] doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000410 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Kelly CR Ihunnah C Fischer M Khoruts A Surawicz C Afzali A et alFecal microbiota transplant for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in immunocompromised patients. Am J Gastroenterol2014;109:1065-71. [PMID: 24890442] doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.133 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Polage CR Gyorke CE Kennedy MA Leslie JL Chin DL Wang S et alOverdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection in the molecular test era. JAMA Intern Med2015;175:1792-801. [PMID: 26348734] doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Surawicz CM McFarland LV Greenberg RN Rubin M Fekety R Mulligan ME et alThe search for a better treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile disease: use of high-dose vancomycin combined with Saccharomyces boulardii. Clin Infect Dis2000;31:1012-7. [PMID: 11049785] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Jackson M Olefson S Machan JT , and  Kelly CR A high rate of alternative diagnoses in patients referred for presumed Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Gastroenterol2015. [PMID: 26565971] MedlineGoogle Scholar