Electronic Health Record–Based Interventions for Improving Appropriate Diagnostic Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
Abstract
Background:
One driver of increasing health care costs is the use of radiologic imaging procedures. More appropriate use could improve quality and reduce costs.
Purpose:
To review interventions that use the computerized clinical decision-support (CCDS) capabilities of electronic health records to improve appropriate use of diagnostic radiologic test ordering.
Data Sources:
English-language articles in PubMed from 1995 to September 2014 and searches in Web of Science and PubMed of citations related to key articles.
Study Selection:
23 studies, including 3 randomized trials, 7 time-series studies, and 13 pre–post studies that assessed the effect of CCDS on diagnostic radiologic test ordering in adults.
Data Extraction:
2 independent reviewers extracted data on functionality, study outcomes, and context and assessed the quality of included studies.
Data Synthesis:
Thirteen studies provided moderate-level evidence that CCDS improves appropriateness (effect size, −0.49 [95% CI, −0.71 to −0.26]) and reduces use (effect size, −0.13 [CI, −0.23 to −0.04]). Interventions with a “hard stop” that prevents a clinician from overriding the CCDS without outside consultation, as well as interventions in integrated care delivery systems, may be more effective. Harms have rarely been assessed but include decreased ordering of appropriate tests and physician dissatisfaction.
Limitation:
Potential for publication bias, insufficient reporting of harms, and poor description of context and implementation.
Conclusion:
Computerized clinical decision support integrated with the electronic health record can improve appropriate use of diagnostic radiology by a moderate amount and decrease use by a small amount. Before widespread adoption can be recommended, more data are needed on potential harms.
Primary Funding Source:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007469)
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Kocher KE, Meurer WJ, Fazel R, Scott PA, Krumholz HM, Nallamothu BK. National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58:452-62. [PMID: 21835499] doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.05.020
2.
Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD. Use of advanced radiology during visits to U.S. emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998-2007. JAMA. 2010;304:1465-71. [PMID: 20924012] doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1408
3.
Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, Deyo RA. Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373:463-72. [PMID: 19200918] doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60172-0
4.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264-9. [PMID: 19622511]
5.
Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742-52. [PMID: 16702590]
6.
Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:464-71. [PMID: 21383365] doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0178
7.
Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, Towfigh AA, Haggstrom DA, Miake-Lye I, et al. Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:677-87. [PMID: 24247673] doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00006
8.
Jones SS, Rudin RS, Perry T, Shekelle PG. Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:48-54. [PMID: 24573664] doi: 10.7326/M13-1531
9.
Georgiou A, Prgomet M, Markewycz A, Adams E, Westbrook JI. The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on medical-imaging services: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:335-40. [PMID: 21385821] doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000043
10.
Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, Garg AX, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA, et al; CCDSS Systematic Review Team. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision maker–researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;6:92. [PMID: 21824386] doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-92
11.
Fillmore CL, Bray BE, Kawamoto K. Systematic review of clinical decision support interventions with potential for inpatient cost reduction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:135. [PMID: 24344752] doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-135
12.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Chapter 7: Converting among effect sizes. In: Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR, eds. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester, UK: J Wiley; 2011:45-9.
13.
Sánchez-Meca J, Maríen-Martíinez F, Chacón-Moscoso S. Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods. 2003;8:448-67. [PMID: 14664682]
14.
IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF. The Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian–Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:25. [PMID: 24548571] doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-25
15.
Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Jha A, Teich JM, Orav EJ, Ma'luf N, et al. Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization? Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2501-8. [PMID: 9385303]
16.
Tierney WM, McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Martin DK. Computer predictions of abnormal test results. Effects on outpatient testing. JAMA. 1988;259:1194-8. [PMID: 3339821]
17.
Harpole LH, Khorasani R, Fiskio J, Kuperman GJ, Bates DW. Automated evidence-based critiquing of orders for abdominal radiographs: impact on utilization and appropriateness. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:511-21. [PMID: 9391938]
18.
Blackmore CC, Mecklenburg RS, Kaplan GS. Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:19-25. [PMID: 21211760] doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.07.009
19.
Carton M, Auvert B, Guerini H, Boulard JC, Heautot JF, Landre MF, et al. Assessment of radiological referral practice and effect of computer-based guidelines on radiological requests in two emergency departments. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:123-8. [PMID: 11977945]
20.
Chin HL, Wallace P. Embedding guidelines into direct physician order entry: simple methods, powerful results. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, Washington, DC, 6–10 November 1999.
21.
Ip IK, Schneider L, Seltzer S, Smith A, Dudley J, Menard A, et al. Impact of provider-led, technology-enabled radiology management program on imaging. Am J Med. 2013;126:687-92. [PMID: 23786668] doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.034
22.
Raja AS, Ip IK, Prevedello LM, Sodickson AD, Farkas C, Zane RD, et al. Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Radiology. 2012;262:468-74. [PMID: 22187633] doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110951
23.
Rosenthal DI, Weilburg JB, Schultz T, Miller JC, Nixon V, Dreyer KJ, et al. Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:799-806. [PMID: 17412171]
24.
Sistrom CL, Dang PA, Weilburg JB, Dreyer KJ, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH. Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. Radiology. 2009;251:147-55. [PMID: 19221058] doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511081174
25.
Curry L, Reed MH. Electronic decision support for diagnostic imaging in a primary care setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:267-70. [PMID: 21486884] doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000049
26.
Day F, Hoang LP, Ouk S, Nagda S, Schriger DL. The impact of a guideline-driven computer charting system on the emergency care of patients with acute low back pain. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:576-80. [PMID: 8563351]
27.
Drescher FS, Chandrika S, Weir ID, Weintraub JT, Berman L, Lee R, et al. Effectiveness and acceptability of a computerized decision support system using modified Wells criteria for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:613-21. [PMID: 21050624] doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.018
28.
Durand DJ, Feldman LS, Lewin JS, Brotman DJ. Provider cost transparency alone has no impact on inpatient imaging utilization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10:108-13. [PMID: 23273974] doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.020
29.
Flamm M, Fritsch G, Hysek M, Klausner S, Entacher K, Panisch S, et al. Quality improvement in preoperative assessment by implementation of an electronic decision support tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:e91-6. [PMID: 23599223] doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001178
30.
Gupta A, Ip IK, Raja AS, Andruchow JE, Sodickson A, Khorasani R. Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:e347-51. [PMID: 24534635] doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002536
31.
Soo Hoo GW. Wu CC, Vazirani S, Li Z. Barack BM, Does a clinical decision rule using D-dimer level improve the yield of pulmonary CT angiography? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1059-64. [PMID: 21512071] doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4200
32.
Ip IK, Gershanik EF, Schneider LI, Raja AS, Mar W, Seltzer S, et al. Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain. Am J Med. 2014;127:512-8. [PMID: 24513065] doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.01.024
33.
Sanders DL, Miller RA. The effects on clinician ordering patterns of a computerized decision support system for neuroradiology imaging studies. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:583-7. [PMID: 11825254]
34.
Solberg LI, Wei F, Butler JC, Palattao KJ, Vinz CA, Marshall MA. Effects of electronic decision support on high-tech diagnostic imaging orders and patients. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:102-6. [PMID: 20148614]
35.
Tierney WM, Miller ME, McDonald CJ. The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1499-504. [PMID: 2186274]
36.
Vartanians VM, Sistrom CL, Weilburg JB, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH. Increasing the appropriateness of outpatient imaging: effects of a barrier to ordering low-yield examinations. Radiology. 2010;255:842-9. [PMID: 20501721] doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091228
37.
Raja AS, Gupta A, Ip IK, Mills AM, Khorasani R. The use of decision support to measure documented adherence to a national imaging quality measure. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:378-83. [PMID: 24507424] doi: 10.1016/j.ascra.2013.10.017
38.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc; 1988.
39.
Strom BL, Schinnar R, Aberra F, Bilker W, Hennessy S, Leonard CE, et al. Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1578-83. [PMID: 20876410] doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.324
40.
Bowen S, Johnson K, Reed MH, Zhang L, Curry L. The effect of incorporating guidelines into a computerized order entry system for diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:251-8. [PMID: 21458763] doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.11.020
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 162 • Number 8 • 21 April 2015
Pages: 557 - 565
History
Published online: 21 April 2015
Published in issue: 21 April 2015
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Download article citation data for:
Electronic Health Record–Based Interventions for Improving Appropriate Diagnostic Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med.2015;162:557-565. [Epub 21 April 2015]. doi:10.7326/M14-2600
Electronic Health Record–Based Interventions for Improving Appropriate Diagnostic Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med.2015;162:557-565. [Epub 21 April 2015]. doi:10.7326/M14-2600
View More
Get Access
Login Options:
Purchase
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.
Create your Free Account
You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.
Comments
0 Comments