Reviews
21 October 2014

A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach to Common Symptoms: A Narrative Review

Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 161, Number 8

Abstract

Physical symptoms account for more than half of all outpatient visits, yet the predominant disease-focused model of care is inadequate for many of these symptom-prompted encounters. Moreover, the amount of clinician training dedicated to understanding, evaluating, and managing common symptoms is disproportionally small relative to their prevalence, impairment, and health care costs. This narrative review regarding physical symptoms addresses 4 common epidemiologic questions: cause, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.
Important findings include the following: First, at least one third of common symptoms do not have a clear-cut, disease-based explanation (5 studies in primary care, 1 in specialty clinics, and 2 in the general population). Second, the history and physical examination alone contribute 73% to 94% of the diagnostic information, with costly testing and procedures contributing much less (5 studies of multiple types of symptoms and 4 of specific symptoms). Third, physical and psychological symptoms commonly co-occur, making a dualistic approach impractical. Fourth, because most patients have multiple symptoms rather than a single symptom, focusing on 1 symptom and ignoring the others is unwise. Fifth, symptoms improve in weeks to several months in most patients but become chronic or recur in 20% to 25%. Sixth, serious causes that are not apparent after initial evaluation seldom emerge during long-term follow-up. Seventh, certain pharmacologic and behavioral treatments are effective across multiple types of symptoms. Eighth, measuring treatment response with valid scales can be helpful. Finally, communication has therapeutic value, including providing an explanation and probable prognosis without “normalizing” the symptom.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Kroenke K. Studying symptoms: sampling and measurement issues. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:844-53. [PMID: 11346320]
2.
Green LAFryer GE JrYawn BPLanier DDovey SM. The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:2021-5. [PMID: 11430334]
3.
Kroenke KSpitzer RLWilliams JBLinzer MHahn SRdeGruy FV 3rdet al. Physical symptoms in primary care. Predictors of psychiatric disorders and functional impairment. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3:774-9. [PMID: 7987511]
4.
Kroenke K. Patients presenting with somatic complaints: epidemiology, psychiatric comorbidity and management. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12:34-43. [PMID: 12830308]
5.
Hahn SR. Physical symptoms and physician-experienced difficulty in the physician-patient relationship. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:897-904. [PMID: 11346326]
6.
Kroenke KMangelsdorff AD. Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome. Am J Med. 1989;86:262-6. [PMID: 2919607]
7.
Khan AAKhan AHarezlak JTu WKroenke K. Somatic symptoms in primary care: etiology and outcome. Psychosomatics. 2003;44:471-8. [PMID: 14597681]
8.
Marple RLKroenke KLucey CRWilder JLucas CA. Concerns and expectations in patients presenting with physical complaints. Frequency, physician perceptions and actions, and 2-week outcome. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1482-8. [PMID: 9224227]
9.
Steinbrecher NKoerber SFrieser DHiller W. The prevalence of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. Psychosomatics. 2011;52:263-71. [PMID: 21565598]  doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.01.007
10.
Reid SWessely SCrayford THotopf M. Medically unexplained symptoms in frequent attenders of secondary health care: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2001;322:767. [PMID: 11282861]
11.
Kroenke KPrice RK. Symptoms in the community. Prevalence, classification, and psychiatric comorbidity. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2474-80. [PMID: 8215752]
12.
Escobar JICook BChen CNGara MAAlegría MInterian Aet al. Whether medically unexplained or not, three or more concurrent somatic symptoms predict psychopathology and service use in community populations. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69:1-8. [PMID: 20630257]  doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.001
13.
National Research Council. Gulf War and Health: Treatment for Chronic Multisymptom Illness. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2013.
14.
Kroenke KWu JBair MJKrebs EEDamush TMTu W. Reciprocal relationship between pain and depression: a 12-month longitudinal analysis in primary care. J Pain. 2011;12:964-73. [PMID: 21680251]  doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.03.003
15.
Löwe BSpitzer RLWilliams JBMussell MSchellberg DKroenke K. Depression, anxiety and somatization in primary care: syndrome overlap and functional impairment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30:191-9. [PMID: 18433651]  doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.01.001
16.
Kroenke K. Somatoform disorders and recent diagnostic controversies. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2007;30:593-619. [PMID: 17938036]
17.
Kroenke KRosmalen JG. Symptoms, syndromes, and the value of psychiatric diagnostics in patients who have functional somatic disorders. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90:603-26. [PMID: 16843765]
18.
Katon WLin EHKroenke K. The association of depression and anxiety with medical symptom burden in patients with chronic medical illness. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007;29:147-55. [PMID: 17336664]
19.
Kroenke KLucas CARosenberg MLScherokman BHerbers JE JrWehrle PAet al. Causes of persistent dizziness. A prospective study of 100 patients in ambulatory care. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:898-904. [PMID: 1443950]
20.
Schmitt BPKushner MSWiener SL. The diagnostic usefulness of the history of the patient with dyspnea. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:386-93. [PMID: 3794838]
21.
Kroenke KJackson JLChamberlin J. Depressive and anxiety disorders in patients presenting with physical complaints: clinical predictors and outcome. Am J Med. 1997;103:339-47. [PMID: 9375700]
22.
Barsevick AM. The concept of symptom cluster. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2007;23:89-98. [PMID: 17512435]
23.
Aktas AWalsh DRybicki L. Symptom clusters: myth or reality? Palliat Med. 2010;24:373-85. [PMID: 20507866]  doi: 10.1177/0269216310367842
24.
Hanel GHenningsen PHerzog WSauer NSchaefert RSzecsenyi Jet al. Depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders: vague or distinct categories in primary care? Results from a large cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67:189-97. [PMID: 19686874]  doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.013
25.
Gardner JWGibbons RVHooper TICunnion SOKroenke KGackstetter GD. Identifying new diseases and their causes: the dilemma of illnesses in Gulf War veterans. Mil Med. 2003;168:186-93. [PMID: 12685682]
26.
Aaron LABuchwald D. A review of the evidence for overlap among unexplained clinical conditions. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:868-81. [PMID: 11346323]
27.
Hampton JRHarrison MJMitchell JRPrichard JSSeymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. Br Med J. 1975;2:486-9. [PMID: 1148666]
28.
Sandler G. The importance of the history in the medical clinic and the cost of unnecessary tests. Am Heart J. 1980;100:928-31. [PMID: 7446394]
29.
Gruppen LDWoolliscroft JOWolf FM. The contribution of different components of the clinical encounter in generating and eliminating diagnostic hypotheses. Res Med Educ. 1988;27:242-7. [PMID: 3218864]
30.
Peterson MCHolbrook JHVon Hales DSmith NLStaker LV. Contributions of the history, physical examination, and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses. West J Med. 1992;156:163-5. [PMID: 1536065]
31.
Martina BBucheli BStotz MBattegay EGyr N. First clinical judgment by primary care physicians distinguishes well between nonorganic and organic causes of abdominal or chest pain. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:459-65. [PMID: 9276650]
32.
Deyo RARainville JKent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA. 1992;268:760-5. [PMID: 1386391]
33.
Pryor DBShaw LMcCants CBLee KLMark DBHarrell FE Jret al. Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:81-90. [PMID: 8416322]
34.
Rich ECCrowson TWHarris IB. The diagnostic value of the medical history. Perceptions of internal medicine physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1957-60. [PMID: 3675097]
35.
Young MJPoses RM. Medical student perceptions of the value of the history and physical examination. J Med Educ. 1983;58:738-9. [PMID: 6887220]
36.
Hoffman RMEinstadter DKroenke K. Evaluating dizziness. Am J Med. 1999;107:468-78. [PMID: 10569302]
37.
Rolfe ABurton C. Reassurance after diagnostic testing with a low pretest probability of serious disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:407-16. [PMID: 23440131]  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2762
38.
Kroenke K. Diagnostic testing and the illusory reassurance of normal results: comment on “Reassurance after diagnostic testing with a low pretest probability of serious disease”. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:416-7. [PMID: 23440265]  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11
39.
Wasson JHSox HC JrSox CH. The diagnosis of abdominal pain in ambulatory male patients. Med Decis Making. 1981;1:215-24. [PMID: 7052409]
40.
Von Korff MDeyo RACherkin DBarlow W. Back pain in primary care. Outcomes at 1 year. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:855-62. [PMID: 8316884]
41.
Costa Lda CMaher CGMcAuley JHHancock MJHerbert RDRefshauge KMet al. Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b3829. [PMID: 19808766]  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3829
42.
Sox HC JrMargulies ISox CH. Psychologically mediated effects of diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med. 1981;95:680-5. [PMID: 7305144]
43.
Hawkins CFCockel R. The prognosis and risk of missing malignant disease in patients with unexplained and functional diarrhoea. Gut. 1971;12:208-11. [PMID: 5552189]
44.
Kroenke KWood DRMangelsdorff ADMeier NJPowell JB. Chronic fatigue in primary care. Prevalence, patient characteristics, and outcome. JAMA. 1988;260:929-34. [PMID: 3398197]
45.
Kroenke KLucas CRosenberg MLScherokman BHerbers JE. One-year outcome for patients with a chief complaint of dizziness. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:684-9. [PMID: 7876951]
46.
Weber BEKapoor WN. Evaluation and outcomes of patients with palpitations. Am J Med. 1996;100:138-48. [PMID: 8629647]
47.
Stone JCarson ADuncan RColeman RRoberts RWarlow Cet al. Symptoms ‘unexplained by organic disease’ in 1144 new neurology out-patients: how often does the diagnosis change at follow-up? Brain. 2009;132:2878-88. [PMID: 19737842]  doi: 10.1093/brain/awp220
48.
Gask LDowrick CSalmon PPeters SMorriss R. Reattribution reconsidered: narrative review and reflections on an educational intervention for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care settings. J Psychosom Res. 2011;71:325-34. [PMID: 21999976]  doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.05.008
49.
Skovenborg ELSchröder A. Is physical disease missed in patients with medically unexplained symptoms? A long-term follow-up of 120 patients diagnosed with bodily distress syndrome. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36:38-45. [PMID: 24157056]  doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.09.006
50.
Brody DSMiller SMLerman CESmith DGCaputo GC. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:506-11. [PMID: 2585158]
51.
Kroenke KJackson JL. Outcome in general medical patients presenting with common symptoms: a prospective study with a 2-week and a 3-month follow-up. Fam Pract. 1998;15:398-403. [PMID: 9848423]
52.
Speckens AEVan Hemert AMBolk JHRooijmans HGHengeveld MW. Unexplained physical symptoms: outcome, utilization of medical care and associated factors. Psychol Med. 1996;26:745-52. [PMID: 8817709]
53.
Jackson JLPassamonti M. The outcomes among patients presenting in primary care with a physical symptom at 5 years. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1032-7. [PMID: 16307629]
54.
olde Hartman TCBorghuis MSLucassen PLvan de Laar FASpeckens AEvan Weel C. Medically unexplained symptoms, somatisation disorder and hypochondriasis: course and prognosis. A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2009;66:363-77. [PMID: 19379952]  doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.09.018
55.
Salmon P. The potentially somatizing effect of clinical consultation. CNS Spectr. 2006;11:190-200. [PMID: 16575376]
56.
Smith RCLein CCollins CLyles JSGiven BDwamena FCet al. Treating patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:478-89. [PMID: 12823656]
57.
Henningsen PZipfel SHerzog W. Management of functional somatic syndromes. Lancet. 2007;369:946-55. [PMID: 17368156]
58.
Rao JKWeinberger MKroenke K. Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes: a literature review. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1148-55. [PMID: 11115222]
59.
Jackson JLKroenke K. The effect of unmet expectations among adults presenting with physical symptoms. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:889-97. [PMID: 11346325]
60.
Kravitz RL. Measuring patients' expectations and requests. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:881-8. [PMID: 11346324]
61.
Dowrick CFRing AHumphris GMSalmon P. Normalisation of unexplained symptoms by general practitioners: a functional typology. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:165-70. [PMID: 15006120]
62.
Jackson JLO'Malley PGKroenke K. Antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy for symptom syndromes. CNS Spectr. 2006;11:212-22. [PMID: 16575378]
63.
Kelley GAKelley KSHootman JMJones DL. Effects of community-deliverable exercise on pain and physical function in adults with arthritis and other rheumatic diseases: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:79-93. [PMID: 20824798]  doi: 10.1002/acr.20347
64.
McMillan EMNewhouse IJ. Exercise is an effective treatment modality for reducing cancer-related fatigue and improving physical capacity in cancer patients and survivors: a meta-analysis. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36:892-903. [PMID: 22067010]  doi: 10.1139/h11-082
65.
Daley A. Exercise and depression: a review of reviews. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2008;15:140-7. [PMID: 19104978]  doi: 10.1007/s10880-008-9105-z
66.
Herring MPO'Connor PJDishman RK. The effect of exercise training on anxiety symptoms among patients: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:321-31. [PMID: 20177034]  doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.530
67.
Abbass AKisely SKroenke K. Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for somatic disorders. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78:265-74. [PMID: 19602915]  doi: 10.1159/000228247
68.
Lakhan SESchofield KL. Mindfulness-based therapies in the treatment of somatization disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71834. [PMID: 23990997]  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071834
69.
Tan GCraine MHBair MJGarcia MKGiordano JJensen MPet al. Efficacy of selected complementary and alternative medicine interventions for chronic pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:195-222. [PMID: 17551873]
70.
Morris DWTrivedi MH. Measurement-based care for unipolar depression. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011;13:446-58. [PMID: 21935633]  doi: 10.1007/s11920-011-0237-8
71.
Kroenke K. Enhancing the clinical utility of depression screening. CMAJ. 2012;184:281-2. [PMID: 22231681]  doi: 10.1503/cmaj.112004
72.
Kroenke KSpitzer RLWilliams JBLöwe B. The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32:345-59. [PMID: 20633738]  doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006
73.
Zijlema WLStolk RPLöwe BRief WWhite PDRosmalen JGBioSHaRE. How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires. J Psychosom Res. 2013;74:459-68. [PMID: 23731742]  doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093
74.
Gierk BKohlmann SKroenke KSpangenberg LZenger MBrähler Eet al. The somatic symptom scale-8 (SSS-8): a brief measure of somatic symptom burden. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:399-407. [PMID: 24276929]  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12179
75.
Johns SAKroenke KTheobald DEWu JTu W. Telecare management of pain and depression in patients with cancer: patient satisfaction and predictors of use. J Ambul Care Manage. 2011;34:126-39. [PMID: 21415611]  doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31820ef628

Comments

0 Comments
Sign In to Submit A Comment
Alexandra Malinovska, Roland Bingisser, Christian H. Nickel 15 June 2015
A practical approach to common symptoms: differences between primary care and emergency medicine
Recently, Kurt Kroenke authored an interesting narrative review, presenting a general approach to manage common symptoms (1). The literature cited in the review ‘includes articles familiar to the author, complemented by relevant papers identified by a bibliographic search of those articles’. Using such an approach, relevant studies may be omitted, as the author focuses on a specific medical environment, namely primary care. We would like to extend the discussion to patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs). This population has a higher pre-test probability of serious illness and is increasing across many different health care systems.

The author categorizes physical symptoms into three groups: ‘Pain’, ‘respiratory’, and ‘nonpain and nonrespiratory’ (NP+NR). Examples for ‘NP+NR’ are ‘fatigue’ or ’diarrhoea’. In ED settings, ‘fatigue’ should be assigned as a nonspecific complaint (NSC) with a wide array of differential diagnoses (2), while ‘diarrhoea’ should be classified as a specific complaint (SC) due to its limited differential diagnostic spectrum. Thus, the proposed ‘NP+NR’ group encompasses both NSCs and SCs.

As patients with NSCs represent up to 20% of ED patients and NSCs and SCs show fundamental differences, there are three main issues to consider: First, the used classification with three groups of physical symptoms is not easily applicable to all settings: When applying this classification to a Swedish cohort of about 13000 ED patients (3), the amount of ‘NP+NR’ symptoms reaches up to 50%. Even if the classification is applied using all presenting complaints, the amount of ‘NP+NR’ symptoms is about 45% (own, unpublished data, 6282 ED patients). This demonstrates that ‘NP+NR’ encompasses too many symptoms in one single group. Second, the author describes that initially not expected serious diseases seldom lead to serious outcome. This may be accurate in primary care and for SCs but not for ED patients with NSCs. These are at risk for delayed diagnoses, acute morbidity (60%) 30-day mortality (6%) (4). Third, the assumption that history contributes to the final diagnosis in up to 75% of cases (1) might be true for SCs. However, establishing a working diagnosis in patients with NSCs solely by history taking is less successful. Diagnostic accuracy in NSC relying on history exceeds chance performance, but varies largely across the different presentations (5).

In conclusion, we believe that any practical approach to common symptoms should address NSCs separately. Unfortunately, ‘NP+NR’ contains both SCs and NSCs and is a rather impractical approach in the emergency physician’s perspective.



1. Kroenke K. A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach to Common Symptoms: A Narrative Review. Annals of internal medicine. 2014;161(8):579-86.
2. Karakoumis J, Nickel CH, Kirsch M, Rohacek M, Geigy N, Müller B, et al. Emergency presentations with nonspecific complaints – the burden of morbidity and the spectrum of underlying disease.
3. Safwenberg U, Terént A, Lind L. The Emergency Department presenting complaint as predictor of in-hospital fatality. European journal of emergency medicine. 2007;14(6):324-31.
4. Nemec M, Koller MT, Nickel CH, Maile S, Winterhalder C, Karrer C, et al. Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Non‐specific Complaints: The Basel Non‐specific Complaints (BANC) Study. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2010;17(3):284-92.
5. Hertwig R, Meier N, Nickel C, Zimmermann P-C, Ackermann S, Woike JK, et al. Correlates of diagnostic accuracy in patients with nonspecific complaints. Medical Decision Making. 2013;33(4):533-43.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 161Number 821 October 2014
Pages: 579 - 586

History

Published online: 21 October 2014
Published in issue: 21 October 2014

Keywords

Authors

Affiliations

Kurt Kroenke, MD
From Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Indiana University, and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Disclosures: Author has disclosed no conflicts of interest. Form can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M14-0461.
Grant Support: None.
Corresponding Author: Kurt Kroenke, MD, Regenstrief Institute, 1050 Wishard Boulevard, 5th Floor, Indianapolis, IN 46202; e-mail, [email protected].
Author Contributions: Conception and design: K. Kroenke.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: K. Kroenke.
Drafting of the article: K. Kroenke.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: K. Kroenke.
Final approval of the article: K. Kroenke.
Collection and assembly of data: K. Kroenke.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format





Download article citation data for:
Kurt Kroenke. A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach to Common Symptoms: A Narrative Review. Ann Intern Med.2014;161:579-586. [Epub 21 October 2014]. doi:10.7326/M14-0461

View More

Login Options:
Purchase

You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.

Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.

Create your Free Account

You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Related in ACP Journals

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media