Original Research6 May 2014
A Quasi-experimental Study
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information

    Abstract

    Background:

    The Massachusetts 2006 health care reform has been called a model for the Affordable Care Act. The law attained near-universal insurance coverage and increased access to care. Its effect on population health is less clear.

    Objective:

    To determine whether the Massachusetts reform was associated with changes in all-cause mortality and mortality from causes amenable to health care.

    Design:

    Comparison of mortality rates before and after reform in Massachusetts versus a control group with similar demographics and economic conditions.

    Setting:

    Changes in mortality rates for adults in Massachusetts counties from 2001 to 2005 (prereform) and 2007 to 2010 (postreform) were compared with changes in a propensity score–defined control group of counties in other states.

    Participants:

    Adults aged 20 to 64 years in Massachusetts and control group counties.

    Measurements:

    Annual county-level all-cause mortality in age-, sex-, and race-specific cells (n = 146 825) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Compressed Mortality File. Secondary outcomes were deaths from causes amenable to health care, insurance coverage, access to care, and self-reported health.

    Results:

    Reform in Massachusetts was associated with a significant decrease in all-cause mortality compared with the control group (−2.9%; P = 0.003, or an absolute decrease of 8.2 deaths per 100 000 adults). Deaths from causes amenable to health care also significantly decreased (−4.5%; P < 0.001). Changes were larger in counties with lower household incomes and higher prereform uninsured rates. Secondary analyses showed significant gains in coverage, access to care, and self-reported health. The number needed to treat was approximately 830 adults gaining health insurance to prevent 1 death per year.

    Limitations:

    Nonrandomized design subject to unmeasured confounders. Massachusetts results may not generalize to other states.

    Conclusion:

    Health reform in Massachusetts was associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality and deaths from causes amenable to health care.

    Primary Funding Source:

    None.

    References

    • 1. Long SKStockley KDahlen HMassachusetts health reforms: uninsurance remains low, self-reported health status improves as state prepares to tackle costs. Health Aff (Millwood)2012;31:444-51. [PMID: 22282572] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Kolstad JTKowalski AEThe impact of health care reform on hospital and preventive care: evidence from Massachusetts. J Public Econ2012;96:909-929. [PMID: 23180894] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Zhu JBrawarsky PLipsitz SHuskamp HHaas JSMassachusetts health reform and disparities in coverage, access and health status. J Gen Intern Med2010;25:1356-62. [PMID: 20730503] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Clark CRSoukup JGovindarajulu URiden HETovar DAJohnson PALack of access due to costs remains a problem for some in Massachusetts despite the state's health reforms. Health Aff (Millwood)2011;30:247-55. [PMID: 21289346] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Key indicators: quarterly enrollment update. Boston: Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy; 2011. Accessed at www.mass.gov/chia/docs/r/pubs/12/2011-june-key-indicators.pdf on 5 March 2014. Google Scholar
    • 6. Long SKOn the road to universal coverage: impacts of reform in Massachusetts at one year. Health Aff (Millwood)2008;27:w270-84. [PMID: 18522948] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Long SKMasi PBAccess and affordability: an update on health reform in Massachusetts, fall 2008. Health Aff (Millwood)2009;28:w578-87. [PMID: 19477874] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Pande AHRoss-Degnan DZaslavsky AMSalomon JAEffects of healthcare reforms on coverage, access, and disparities: quasi-experimental analysis of evidence from Massachusetts. Am J Prev Med2011;41:1-8. [PMID: 21665057] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Van Der Wees PJZaslavsky AMAyanian JZImprovements in health status after Massachusetts health care reform. Milbank Q2013;91:663-89. [PMID: 24320165] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Miller SThe effect of the Massachusetts reform on health care utilization. Inquiry2012;49:317-26. [PMID: 23469675] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Courtemanche CJZapata DDoes universal coverage improve health? The Massachusetts experience. J Policy Anal Manage2014;33:36-69. [PMID: 24358528] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Wilper APWoolhandler SLasser KEMcCormick DBor DHHimmelstein DUHealth insurance and mortality in US adults. Am J Public Health2009;99:2289-95. [PMID: 19762659] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Care without coverage: too little, too late. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2002. Google Scholar
    • 14. Sommers BDBaicker KEpstein AMMortality and access to care among adults after state Medicaid expansions. N Engl J Med2012;367:1025-34. [PMID: 22830435] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Kronick RHealth insurance coverage and mortality revisited. Health Serv Res2009;44:1211-31. [PMID: 19453392] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Finkelstein ATaubman SWright BBernstein MGruber JNewhouse JPet alOregon Health Study GroupThe Oregon health insurance experiment: evidence from the first year. Q J Econ2012;127:1057-1106. [PMID: 23293397] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Weathers RRStegman MThe effect of expanding access to health insurance on the health and mortality of Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries. J Health Econ2012;31:863-75. [PMID: 23000873] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Bertrand MDuflo EMullainathan SHow much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics2004;119:249-75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Dehejia RHWahba SPropensity-score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev Econ Stat2002;84:151-61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School; 2012. Accessed at www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/aabadie/comparative.pdf on 5 March 2014. Google Scholar
    • 21. McDonough JERosman BPhelps FShannon MThe third wave of Massachusetts health care access reform. Health Aff (Millwood)2006;25:w420-31. [PMID: 16973653] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Compressed Mortality File 1999–2010. CD ROM series 20, no. 2P, ASCII version. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. Accessed at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/mortab/1999-2010CMFDocumentation.pdf on 5 March 2014. Google Scholar
    • 23. Area Health Resource File (AHRF), 2011–2012. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012. Google Scholar
    • 24. U.S. Census Bureau. Model-based small area health insurance estimates (SAHIE) for counties and states, 2005. Accessed at www.census.gov/did/www/sahie/data/files/SAHIE2005.TXT on 3 October 2012. Google Scholar
    • 25. Keating NLKouri EMHe YWest DWWiner EPEffect of Massachusetts health insurance reform on mammography use and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer2013;119:250-8. [PMID: 22833148] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Charlton JRVelez RSome international comparisons of mortality amenable to medical intervention. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)1986;292:295-301. [PMID: 3080144] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Mackenbach JPBouvier-Colle MHJougla E“Avoidable” mortality and health services: a review of aggregate data studies. J Epidemiol Community Health1990;44:106-11. [PMID: 2196328] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Nolte EMcKee MMeasuring the health of nations: analysis of mortality amenable to health care. BMJ2003;327:1129. [PMID: 14615335] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Nolte EMcKee CMMeasuring the health of nations: updating an earlier analysis. Health Aff (Millwood)2008;27:58-71. [PMID: 18180480] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Nolte EMcKee MVariations in amenable mortality—trends in 16 high-income nations. Health Policy2011;103:47-52. [PMID: 21917350] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Singer JDWillett JBApplied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 2003. Google Scholar
    • 32. Afendulis CCHe YZaslavsky AMChernew METhe impact of Medicare Part D on hospitalization rates. Health Serv Res2011;46:1022-38. [PMID: 21306] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33. Bendavid EBhattacharya JThe President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief in Africa: an evaluation of outcomes. Ann Intern Med2009;150:688-95. [PMID: 19349625] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 34. Cooper ALTrivedi ANFitness memberships and favorable selection in Medicare Advantage plans. N Engl J Med2012;366:150-7. [PMID: 22236225] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Cotet AMBenjamin DKMedical regulation and health outcomes: the effect of the physician examination requirement. Health Econ2013;22:393-409. [PMID: 22450959] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36. Lien DSEvans WNEstimating the impact of large cigarette tax hikes: the case of maternal smoking and infant birth weight. J Human Resources2005;40:373-92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 37. Besley TBurgess RCan labour regulation hinder economic performance: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics2004;119:91-134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 38. Karaca-Mandic PNorton ECDowd BInteraction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv Res2012;47:255-74. [PMID: 22091735] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 39. Gray BHScheinmann RRosenfeld PFinkelstein RAging without Medicare? Evidence from New York City. Inquiry2006;43:211-21. [PMID: 17176965] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 40. Baicker KTaubman SLAllen HLBernstein MGruber JHNewhouse JPet alOregon Health Study GroupThe Oregon experiment—effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes. N Engl J Med2013;368:1713-22. [PMID: 23635051] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 41. Miilunpalo SVuori IOja PPasanen MUrponen HSelf-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol1997;50:517-28. [PMID: 9180644] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42. DeSalvo KBBloser NReynolds KHe JMuntner PMortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med2006;21:267-75. [PMID: 16336622] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 43. Eisenberg JMPower EJTransforming insurance coverage into quality health care: voltage drops from potential to delivered quality. JAMA2000;284:2100-7. [PMID: 11042759] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44. DeLeire TDague LLeininger LVoskuil KFriedsam DWisconsin experience indicates that expanding public insurance to low-income childless adults has health care impacts. Health Aff (Millwood)2013;32:1037-45. [PMID: 23733977] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 45. Sommers BDKenney GMEpstein AMNew evidence on the Affordable Care Act: coverage impacts of early Medicaid expansions. Health Aff (Millwood)2014;33:78-87. [PMID: 24395938] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 46. U.S. Census Bureau. State rankings—Statistical Abstract of the United States: doctors per 100,000 resident population, 2007. Accessed at www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/ranks/rank18.html on 12 November 2012. Google Scholar