Academia and the Profession
4 March 2014

Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers

Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 160, Number 5

Abstract

Background:

Female physician-researchers do not achieve career success at the same rate as men. Differences in nonprofessional responsibilities may partially explain this gap.

Objective:

To investigate the division of domestic labor by gender in a motivated group of early-career physician-researchers.

Design:

Nationwide postal survey between 2010 and 2011.

Setting:

United States.

Participants:

Physician recipients of National Institutes of Health K08 or K23 awards between 2006 and 2009 with active academic affiliation at the time of the survey.

Measurements:

Time spent on parenting and domestic tasks was determined through self-report. Among married or partnered respondents with children, a linear regression model of time spent on domestic activities was constructed considering age, gender, race, specialty, MD or MD/PhD status, age of youngest child, number of children, work hours, K award type, and spousal employment.

Results:

A 74% response rate was achieved, and 1049 respondents were academic physicians. Women were more likely than men to have spouses or domestic partners who were employed full-time (85.6% [95% CI, 82.7% to 89.2%] vs. 44.9% [CI, 40.8% to 49.8%]). Among married or partnered respondents with children, after adjustment for work hours, spousal employment, and other factors, women spent 8.5 more hours per week on domestic activities. In the subgroup with spouses or domestic partners who were employed full-time, women were more likely to take time off during disruptions of usual child care arrangements than men (42.6% [CI, 36.6% to 49.0%] vs. 12.4% [CI, 5.4% to 19.5%]).

Limitations:

Analyses relied on self-reported data. The study design did not enable investigation of the relationship between domestic activities and professional success.

Conclusion:

In this sample of career-oriented professionals, gender differences in domestic activities existed among those with children. Most men's spouses or domestic partners were not employed full-time, which contrasted sharply with the experiences of women.

Primary Funding Source:

National Institutes of Health.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Waite LJNielsen M. The rise of the dual-earner family, 1963–1997. In: Hertz R, Marshall NL, eds. Working Families: The Transformation of the American Home. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Pr; 2001:23-41.
2.
Bianchi SMMilkie MASayer LCRobinson JP. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces. 2000;79:191-228.
3.
Coltrane S. Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. J Marriage Fam. 2000;62:1208-33.
4.
Blau FD, Kahn LM. The gender pay gap. Economists' Voice. June 2007:1-6.
5.
Breen RCooke LP. The persistence of the gendered division of domestic labour. Eur Sociol Rev. 2005;21:43-57.
6.
Dyrbye LNShanafelt TDBalch CMSatele DSloan JFreischlag J. Relationship between work-home conflicts and burnout among American surgeons: a comparison by sex. Arch Surg. 2011;146:211-7. [PMID: 21339435]
7.
Jagsi RDeCastro RGriffith KARangarajan SChurchill CStewart Aet al. Similarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients. Acad Med. 2011;86:1415-21. [PMID: 21952061]
8.
Jagsi RGuancial EAWorobey CCHenault LEChang YStarr Ret al. The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:281-7. [PMID: 16855268]
9.
Jagsi RMotomura ARGriffith KARangarajan SUbel PA. Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:804-11. [PMID: 19949146]
10.
Pohlhaus JRJiang HWagner RMSchaffer WTPinn VW. Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs. Acad Med. 2011;86:759-67. [PMID: 21512358]
11.
Shelton CShelton L. The NeXt Revolution: What Gen X Women Want at Work and How Their Boomer Bosses Can Help Them Get It. 1st ed. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Pub; 2005.
12.
Taylor PFunk CClark A. Generation gap in values, behaviors: as marriage and parenthood drift apart, public is concerned about social impact. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2007.
13.
Bickel JBrown AJ. Generation X: implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers. Acad Med. 2005;80:205-10.
14.
Howell LPJoad JPCallahan EServis GBonham AC. Generational forecasting in academic medicine: a unique method of planning for success in the next two decades. Acad Med. 2009;84:985-93. [PMID: 19638760]
15.
Howell LPServis GBonham A. Multigenerational challenges in academic medicine: UCDavis's responses. Acad Med. 2005;80:527-32. [PMID: 15917354]
16.
Jovic EWallace JELemaire J. The generation and gender shifts in medicine: an exploratory survey of internal medicine physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:55. [PMID: 16677387]
17.
Dillman DASmyth JDChristian LM. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: J Wiley; 2009.
18.
Kaplan SHSullivan LMDukes KAPhillips CFKelch RPSchaller JG. Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1282-9. [PMID: 8857009]
19.
University of Michigan. Survey of Academic Climate and Activities. Accessed at www.advance.rackham.umich.edu/climatesurvey.pdf on 24 June 2013.
20.
Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
21.
Jagsi RGriffith KAStewart ASambuco DDeCastro RUbel PA. Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA. 2012;307:2410-7. [PMID: 22692173]
22.
Sison CPGlaz J. Simultaneous confidence intervals and sample size determination for multinomial proportions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90:366-9.
23.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. American Time Use Survey—2010 Results. 2011. Accessed at www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/atus_06222011.pdf on 24 June 2013.
24.
Carr PLAsh ASFriedman RHScaramucci ABarnett RCSzalacha Let al. Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:532-8. [PMID: 9758572]
25.
Warde CAllen WGelberg L. Physician role conflict and resulting career changes. Gender and generational differences. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:729-35. [PMID: 9016419]
26.
Warde CMMoonesinghe KAllen WGelberg L. Marital and parental satisfaction of married physicians with children. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:157-65. [PMID: 10203621]
27.
Sobecks NWJustice ACHinze SChirayath HTLasek RJChren MMet al. When doctors marry doctors: a survey exploring the professional and family lives of young physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:312-9. [PMID: 10068390]
28.
Uhlenberg PCooney TM. Male and female physicians: family and career comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:373-8. [PMID: 2309131]
29.
Schiebinger L, Henderson AD, Gilmartin SK. Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know. Stanford, CA: Michelle R. Clayman Institute of Gender Research, Stanford University; 2008. Accessed at http://gender.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/DualCareerFinal_0.pdf on 24 June 2013.
30.
Fox MF. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Soc Stud Sci. 2005;35:131-50.
31.
Lachance-Grzela MBouchard G. Why do women do the lion's share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles. 2010;63:767-80.
32.
Jagsi RGriffith KAStewart ASambuco DDeCastro RUbel PA. Gender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician-researchers. Acad Med. 2013;88:1689-99. [PMID: 24072109]
33.
Greenstein TNTheodore N. Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: a replication and extension. J Marriage Fam. 2000;62:322-35.
34.
Tilly C. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Pr; 1999.
35.
Bolzendahl CIMyers DJ. Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Soc Forces. 2004;83:759-90.

Comments

0 Comments
Sign In to Submit A Comment
Dena E. Rifkin MD, MS, Nisha Bansal MD, MAS, Esther K. Choo, MD, MPH 20 March 2014
"Balance" is not a solution
To the editor:
As current NIH career development awardees who are also mothers with employed spouses,
we were not shocked to learn that women of our generation continue to bear a disproportionate
burden of domestic work in comparison to men, or that the amount of time women with children
devote to research is lower than that spent by their male counterparts (with a gap that is, not
coincidentally, roughly equal to the extra time doing domestic work).
What did shock us were the conclusions drawn by the editorialists. They state that the "true measure of a successful life in academic medicine... may no longer be measured in grants garnered, papers published, or salary attained but rather in the flexibility to balance" other life goals. At our institutions, the sine qua nons of a research-based academic career and promotion from the junior faculty state are grants and papers. To paraphrase Vince Lombardi, grants and papers aren't everything -- they are the only thing. While there are other career trajectories now open in the world of academic medicine, the primarily research-funded academician still needs to produce publications and acquire independent funding to continue in that role and continue to advance up the academic ladder, regardless of gender.
We have each benefited from excellent mentors, both male and female, during our career
development grants. The advice we hear from these mentors is clear: moving from a K grant to
an independently funded research career is challenging and needs to be accomplished during
the five-year K grant timeline. This transition is one where many women researchers falter in
the academic track, either by switching to a different track or by failing to obtain funding. Not
coincidentally, this timeline overlaps with a period in which child-rearing is a distraction, albeit an enjoyable and rewarding one.
More radical solutions than a paean to 'balance' are needed to close the gender gap in
academic medicine which continues to include unequal pay and fewer opportunities for promotion among women. Individual women cannot continue to compensate for the inadequacies of systems. Hospitals and universities of the 21st century must consider how best to support women -- and not only women, in truth, but anyone with significant, time-consuming roles of childcare or other major family responsibilities -- so that they can have sustained, productive academic careers.
Ann Danoff MD 24 March 2014
Sex and the Academy
As a “baby boomer” and former K08 Awardee who leaked out of the academic pipeline (1) long ago, the grim observations by Jolly et. al. (2) regarding ongoing challenges among “Generation X” women to achieve gender equity in academic medical centers and on the home front is disheartening. However, the authors efforts to illuminate these unresolved issues and offer a glimmer of hope that one day we may find creative solutions, so that women who wish to do so are retained as productive and successful investigators, is reassuring.

In contrast, I found the accompanying editorial (3) deeply disturbing. While the editors acknowledge that “continued differences in standards are inexcusable”, they are much too quick to attribute ongoing gender inequity to “preferences” and “choices” made by women aiming to achieve work/life “balance”. As Jolly et. al. demonstrate (2), these so-called “choices” are strongly influenced by work and home environments. To de-emphasize the experience afforded women in academic medical centers (4) or the impact of the “Second Shift” (well described in the 1989 classic by Hochschild) on career decisions does a great disservice to the individual women involved. Examples of not being heard, not being credited for efforts at work, and pay inequity are commonplace among women in medicine, as are descriptions of how her husband “helps” with the childcare, followed in the next breadth by the acknowledgement that it is still her job to keep track of the supermarket list and soccer game schedule, and gently remind her partner to “please pick up the milk”.

I cannot agree more with Cooke and Laine that I have been personally blessed with a rich and varied professional career. However, it was, (arguably), neither by choice nor personal failings that I took this path, but rather, because the deck was stacked against me. It is regrettable that, like the women of my generation, female “Gen-X’ers” must still contend with “accumulated disadvantages” (the converse of “accumulated advantages” described by Malcolm Gladwell in “Outliers”).

It appears we still have an awful lot of work to do. Until all doors are fully opened for each and every one of us (women, men, people of all colors and every sexual orientation), and each of us has equal opportunity for real choice about where on the bus (or in the medical community) we wish to sit, all of us will continue to be short-changed as individuals and as a society.

1. Justice AC. Leaky Pipes, Faustian Dilemmas, and a Room of One’s Own: Can We Build a More Flexible Pipeline to Academic Success? Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:818-819.

2. Jolly S, Griffith KA, DeCastro R, Stewart A, Ubel P, Jagsi R. Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:344-353.

3. Cooke M, and Laine C. A Woman Physician-Researcher's Work Is Never Done. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:359-360.

4. Levine RB, Lin F, Kern DE, Wright SM, Carrese J. Stories From Early-Career Women Physicians Who Have Left Academic Medicine: A Qualitative Study at a Single Institution. Academic Medicine. 2011; 752-58.
Toni Martin MD 26 March 2014
Choice in a social context


Perhaps the reason that the authors did not conclude, as the editorialists do, that the observed differences in parenting were due to simple choice, is that women, like men, make choices within a social context. Doris Rubin Bennett, former Chief of Pediatrics at Harvard Community Health Plan, added a postscript to a “lighthearted” career article when it was included in an anthology in 2002. “In 1961, I was the brainwashed product of my culture’s view of woman’s place in society.” At the time, she believed that she was choosing to take primary responsibility at home but looking back, she saw how constrained that choice was by society’s definition of a good wife and mother. The fact that 85% of the spouses of women physicians in the current study were employed full time while only 45% of the spouses of their male colleagues were, underlines the enduring strength of traditional gender roles.
Although successful, Dr. Bennett emphatically advocated for her younger colleagues. A woman doctor “… should be able to experience the joys and responsibilities of marriage and parenthood equally with her male colleague—but not more equally.”

Bennett, Doris Rubin. Postscript. In: Chin, Eliza Lo, editor. This Side of Doctoring: Reflections From Women in Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications;
2002. p. 31-32.
Reshma Jagsi, MD 21 April 2014
Author's Response
We appreciate the insights shared by these authors and thank them for providing such rich and vivid examples from female physicians’ lived experiences to complement the data we presented. We also appreciate the editors’ decision to publish these letters, which reflects their clear commitment to stimulating the sort of healthy discourse and debate that characterizes the academic enterprise at its best. Although we, like the authors of the letters, believe our findings are a sobering indication of powerful societal constraints on women’s choices even today, we are heartened by growing recognition of these issues and efforts by institutions to support physicians whose careers necessarily develop in this complex social context.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 160Number 54 March 2014
Pages: 344 - 353

History

Published online: 4 March 2014
Published in issue: 4 March 2014

Keywords

Authors

Affiliations

Shruti Jolly, MD
From the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine and Center for Cancer Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Kent A. Griffith, MS
From the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine and Center for Cancer Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Rochelle DeCastro, MS
From the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine and Center for Cancer Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Abigail Stewart, PhD
From the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine and Center for Cancer Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Peter Ubel, MD
From the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine and Center for Cancer Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Reshma Jagsi, MD, DPhil
From the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine and Center for Cancer Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank the K award recipients who took the time to participate in this study.
Grant Support: Dr. Jagsi was supported by the NIH (grant 5 R01 HL101997-04). Dr. Ubel was supported by grants from the NIH and a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Investigator Award in Health Policy Research.
Corresponding Author: Reshma Jagsi, MD, DPhil, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, UHB2C490, SPC 5010, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5010; e-mail, [email protected].
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Jolly and Jagsi: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, UHB2C490, SPC 5010, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5010.
Mr. Griffith: Center for Cancer Biostatistics, M2180 SPHII, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029.
Ms. DeCastro: Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 430W, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800.
Dr. Stewart: Department of Psychology and Women's Studies Program, University of Michigan, 204 South State Street, G277B Lane Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1290.
Dr. Ubel: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC 27708.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: S. Jolly, K.A. Griffith, P. Ubel, R. Jagsi.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: S. Jolly, K.A. Griffith, A. Stewart, R. Jagsi.
Drafting of the article: S. Jolly, K.A. Griffith, R. Jagsi.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: S. Jolly, K.A. Griffith, R. DeCastro, P. Ubel, R. Jagsi.
Final approval of the article: S. Jolly, K.A. Griffith, A. Stewart, R. Jagsi.
Provision of study materials or patients: R. Jagsi.
Statistical expertise: K.A. Griffith.
Obtaining of funding: R. Jagsi.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: R. DeCastro.
Collection and assembly of data: R. DeCastro, R. Jagsi.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format





Download article citation data for:
Shruti Jolly, Kent A. Griffith, Rochelle DeCastro, et al. Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers. Ann Intern Med.2014;160:344-353. [Epub 4 March 2014]. doi:10.7326/M13-0974

View More

Login Options:
Purchase

You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.

Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.

Create your Free Account

You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Related in ACP Journals

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media