Academia and the Profession4 March 2014
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information

    Abstract

    Background:

    Female physician-researchers do not achieve career success at the same rate as men. Differences in nonprofessional responsibilities may partially explain this gap.

    Objective:

    To investigate the division of domestic labor by gender in a motivated group of early-career physician-researchers.

    Design:

    Nationwide postal survey between 2010 and 2011.

    Setting:

    United States.

    Participants:

    Physician recipients of National Institutes of Health K08 or K23 awards between 2006 and 2009 with active academic affiliation at the time of the survey.

    Measurements:

    Time spent on parenting and domestic tasks was determined through self-report. Among married or partnered respondents with children, a linear regression model of time spent on domestic activities was constructed considering age, gender, race, specialty, MD or MD/PhD status, age of youngest child, number of children, work hours, K award type, and spousal employment.

    Results:

    A 74% response rate was achieved, and 1049 respondents were academic physicians. Women were more likely than men to have spouses or domestic partners who were employed full-time (85.6% [95% CI, 82.7% to 89.2%] vs. 44.9% [CI, 40.8% to 49.8%]). Among married or partnered respondents with children, after adjustment for work hours, spousal employment, and other factors, women spent 8.5 more hours per week on domestic activities. In the subgroup with spouses or domestic partners who were employed full-time, women were more likely to take time off during disruptions of usual child care arrangements than men (42.6% [CI, 36.6% to 49.0%] vs. 12.4% [CI, 5.4% to 19.5%]).

    Limitations:

    Analyses relied on self-reported data. The study design did not enable investigation of the relationship between domestic activities and professional success.

    Conclusion:

    In this sample of career-oriented professionals, gender differences in domestic activities existed among those with children. Most men's spouses or domestic partners were not employed full-time, which contrasted sharply with the experiences of women.

    Primary Funding Source:

    National Institutes of Health.

    References

    • 1. Waite LJNielsen MThe rise of the dual-earner family, 1963–1997.. In: Hertz R, Marshall NL, eds. Working Families: The Transformation of the American Home. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Pr; 2001:23-41. Google Scholar
    • 2. Bianchi SMMilkie MASayer LCRobinson JPIs anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces2000;79:191-228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Coltrane SResearch on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. J Marriage Fam2000;62:1208-33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Blau FD, Kahn LM. The gender pay gap. Economists' Voice. June 2007:1-6. Google Scholar
    • 5. Breen RCooke LPThe persistence of the gendered division of domestic labour. Eur Sociol Rev2005;21:43-57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Dyrbye LNShanafelt TDBalch CMSatele DSloan JFreischlag JRelationship between work-home conflicts and burnout among American surgeons: a comparison by sex. Arch Surg2011;146:211-7. [PMID: 21339435] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Jagsi RDeCastro RGriffith KARangarajan SChurchill CStewart Aet alSimilarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients. Acad Med2011;86:1415-21. [PMID: 21952061] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Jagsi RGuancial EAWorobey CCHenault LEChang YStarr Ret alThe “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med2006;355:281-7. [PMID: 16855268] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Jagsi RMotomura ARGriffith KARangarajan SUbel PASex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Ann Intern Med2009;151:804-11. [PMID: 19949146] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Pohlhaus JRJiang HWagner RMSchaffer WTPinn VWSex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs. Acad Med2011;86:759-67. [PMID: 21512358] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Shelton CShelton LThe NeXt Revolution: What Gen X Women Want at Work and How Their Boomer Bosses Can Help Them Get It. 1st ed. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Pub; 2005. Google Scholar
    • 12. Taylor PFunk CClark AGeneration gap in values, behaviors: as marriage and parenthood drift apart, public is concerned about social impact. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2007. Google Scholar
    • 13. Bickel JBrown AJGeneration X: implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers. Acad Med2005;80:205-10. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Howell LPJoad JPCallahan EServis GBonham ACGenerational forecasting in academic medicine: a unique method of planning for success in the next two decades. Acad Med2009;84:985-93. [PMID: 19638760] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Howell LPServis GBonham AMultigenerational challenges in academic medicine: UCDavis's responses. Acad Med2005;80:527-32. [PMID: 15917354] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Jovic EWallace JELemaire JThe generation and gender shifts in medicine: an exploratory survey of internal medicine physicians. BMC Health Serv Res2006;6:55. [PMID: 16677387] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Dillman DASmyth JDChristian LMInternet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: J Wiley; 2009. Google Scholar
    • 18. Kaplan SHSullivan LMDukes KAPhillips CFKelch RPSchaller JGSex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med1996;335:1282-9. [PMID: 8857009] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. University of Michigan. Survey of Academic Climate and Activities. Accessed at www.advance.rackham.umich.edu/climatesurvey.pdf on 24 June 2013. Google Scholar
    • 20. Willis GBCognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005. Google Scholar
    • 21. Jagsi RGriffith KAStewart ASambuco DDeCastro RUbel PAGender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA2012;307:2410-7. [PMID: 22692173] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Sison CPGlaz JSimultaneous confidence intervals and sample size determination for multinomial proportions. J Am Stat Assoc1995;90:366-9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 23. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. American Time Use Survey—2010 Results. 2011. Accessed at www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/atus_06222011.pdf on 24 June 2013. Google Scholar
    • 24. Carr PLAsh ASFriedman RHScaramucci ABarnett RCSzalacha Let alRelation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med1998;129:532-8. [PMID: 9758572] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Warde CAllen WGelberg LPhysician role conflict and resulting career changes. Gender and generational differences. J Gen Intern Med1996;11:729-35. [PMID: 9016419] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Warde CMMoonesinghe KAllen WGelberg LMarital and parental satisfaction of married physicians with children. J Gen Intern Med1999;14:157-65. [PMID: 10203621] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Sobecks NWJustice ACHinze SChirayath HTLasek RJChren MMet alWhen doctors marry doctors: a survey exploring the professional and family lives of young physicians. Ann Intern Med1999;130:312-9. [PMID: 10068390] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Uhlenberg PCooney TMMale and female physicians: family and career comparisons. Soc Sci Med1990;30:373-8. [PMID: 2309131] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Schiebinger L, Henderson AD, Gilmartin SK. Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know. Stanford, CA: Michelle R. Clayman Institute of Gender Research, Stanford University; 2008. Accessed at http://gender.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/DualCareerFinal_0.pdf on 24 June 2013. Google Scholar
    • 30. Fox MFGender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Soc Stud Sci2005;35:131-50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Lachance-Grzela MBouchard GWhy do women do the lion's share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles2010;63:767-80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 32. Jagsi RGriffith KAStewart ASambuco DDeCastro RUbel PAGender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician-researchers. Acad Med2013;88:1689-99. [PMID: 24072109] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33. Greenstein TNTheodore NEconomic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: a replication and extension. J Marriage Fam2000;62:322-35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 34. Tilly CDurable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Pr; 1999. Google Scholar
    • 35. Bolzendahl CIMyers DJFeminist attitudes and support for gender equality: opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Soc Forces2004;83:759-90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar