IN RESPONSE:
Researchers, clinicians, and consumers would all benefit from a better understanding of the accuracy of the features on wearable activity trackers and applications. Each of these groups needs to know how accurate the products are and whether they are accurate enough for a user's intended purpose. This latter consideration greatly depends on that specific intended use. For example, a device could be accurate enough to motivate average consumers to increase the intensity of their exercise sessions but not to monitor vigorous-intensity exercise in a patient with known cardiac risks.
Although we expect the number of peer-reviewed validation studies ...
Author, Article and Disclosure Information
From University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, and Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa.
Disclosures: Authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=L16-0353.

Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
*All comments submitted after October 1, 2021 and selected for publication will be published online only.