Patient-Centered Decision Making and Health Care Outcomes: An Observational Study
Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 158, Number 8
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
Abstract
Background:
Patient-centered decision making (PCDM) is the process of identifying clinically relevant, patient-specific circumstances and behaviors to formulate a contextually appropriate care plan.
Objective:
To ascertain whether encounters in which PCDM occurs are followed by improved health care outcomes compared with encounters where there is inattention to patient context.
Design:
Patients surreptitiously audio-recorded encounters with their physicians. Medical records of these encounters were then screened for “contextual red flags,” such as deteriorating self-management of a chronic condition, that could reflect such underlying contextual factors as competing responsibilities or loss of social support. When a contextual factor was identified, either as a result of physician questioning or because a patient volunteered information, physicians were scored on the basis of whether they adapted the care plan to it.
Setting:
Internal medicine clinics at 2 Veterans Affairs facilities.
Participants:
774 patients audio-recorded encounters with 139 resident physicians.
Measurements:
Individualized outcome measures were based on the contextual red flag, such as improved blood pressure control in a patient presenting with hypertension and loss of medication coverage. Outcome coders were blinded to physician performance.
Results:
Among 548 contextual red flags, 208 contextual factors were confirmed, either when physicians probed or patients volunteered information. Physician attention to contextual factors (both probing for them and addressing them in care plans) varied according to the presenting contextual red flags. Outcome data were available for 157 contextual factors, of which PCDM was found to address 96. Of these, health care outcomes improved in 68 (71%), compared with 28 (46%) of the 61 that were not addressed by PCDM (P = 0.002).
Limitation:
The extent to which the findings can be generalized to other clinical settings is unknown.
Conclusion:
Attention to patient needs and circumstances when planning care is associated with improved health care outcomes.
Primary Funding Source:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development Service.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't [Editorial]. BMJ. 1996;312:71-2. [PMID: 8555924]
2.
Weiner SJ. Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: lessons from the qualitative sciences. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:281-5. [PMID: 15009785]
3.
Weiner SJ. Contextual Error. In: Kattan MW, eds. Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:198-202.
4.
Weiner SJ. From research evidence to context: the challenge of individualizing care [Editorial]. ACP J Club. 2004;141:A11-2. [PMID: 15518439]
5.
Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Weaver F, Goldberg J, Yudkowsky R, Sharma G, et al. Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care: a multicenter study. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:69-75. [PMID: 20643988]
6.
Schwartz A, Weiner SJ, Weaver F, Yudkowsky R, Sharma G, Binns-Calvey A, et al. Uncharted territory: measuring costs of diagnostic errors outside the medical record. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:918-24. [PMID: 22773889]
7.
Schwartz A, Weiner SJ, Harris IB, Binns-Calvey A. An educational intervention for contextualizing patient care and medical students' abilities to probe for contextual issues in simulated patients. JAMA. 2010;304:1191-7. [PMID: 20841532]
8.
Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Yudkowsky R, Schiff GD, Weaver FM, Goldberg J, et al. Evaluating physician performance at individualizing care: a pilot study tracking contextual errors in medical decision making. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:726-34. [PMID: 17898243]
9.
Weiner SJ, Ashley N, Binns-Calvey A, Kelly B, Sharma G, Schwartz A. Content Coding for Contextualization of Care (“4C”) Training & Coding Manual. Dataverse Network Project. Accessed at http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/4C (Data & Analysis tab) on 16 February 2013.
10.
Mead N, Bower P. Measuring patient-centredness: a comparison of three observation-based instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:71-80. [PMID: 11013549]
11.
Smith RC, Dwamena FC, Grover M, Coffey J, Frankel RM. Behaviorally defined patient-centered communication—a narrative review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:185-91. [PMID: 20824361]
12.
McCormack LA, Treiman K, Rupert D, Williams-Piehota P, Nadler E, Arora NK, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1085-95. [PMID: 21376443]
13.
Roter D, Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:243-51. [PMID: 11932123]
14.
Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M Jr, Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277:350-6. [PMID: 9002500]
15.
Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Cyrus K, Binns-Calvey A, Weaver FM, Sharma G, et al. Unannounced standardized patient assessment of the roter interaction analysis system: the challenge of measuring patient-centered communication. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:254-60. [PMID: 22990681]
Comments
Sign In to Submit A CommentInformation & Authors
Information
Published In
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 158 • Number 8 • 16 April 2013
Pages: 573 - 579
History
Published online: 16 April 2013
Published in issue: 16 April 2013
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Download article citation data for:
Patient-Centered Decision Making and Health Care Outcomes: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med.2013;158:573-579. [Epub 16 April 2013]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00001
Patient-Centered Decision Making and Health Care Outcomes: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med.2013;158:573-579. [Epub 16 April 2013]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00001
View More
Login Options:
Purchase
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.
Create your Free Account
You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.
Medicine and Poetry
The Romance is Indeed Dead
This is a stomach turning read. The fact that a study needs to be conducted to determine the effect of your doctor simply asking "how are things?" and "What's been going on with you" is truly saddening.