Abstract
Despite recent guidelines promoting online professionalism, consequences for specific violations by physicians have not been explored. In this article, the authors gauged consensus among state medical boards in the United States (response rate, 71%) about the likelihood of investigations for violations of online professionalism by using 10 hypothetical vignettes. High consensus was defined as more than 75% of respondents indicating that investigation was “likely” or “very likely,” moderate consensus as 50% to 75% indicating this, and low consensus as fewer than 50% indicating this.
Four online vignettes demonstrated high consensus: Citing misleading information about clinical outcomes (81%; 39/48), using patient images without consent (79%; 38/48), misrepresenting credentials (77%; 37/48), and inappropriately contacting patients (77%; 37/48). Three demonstrated moderate consensus for investigation: depicting alcohol intoxication (73%; 35/48), violating patient confidentiality (65%; 31/48), and using discriminatory speech (60%; 29/48). Three demonstrated low consensus: using derogatory speech toward patients (46%; 22/48), showing alcohol use without intoxication (40%; 19/48), and providing clinical narratives without violation of confidentiality (16%; 7/48).
Areas of high consensus suggest “online behaviors” that physicians should never engage in, whereas moderate- and low-consensus areas provide useful contextual information about “gray areas.” Increased awareness of these specific behaviors may reduce investigations and improve online professionalism for physicians.
References
- 1.
Edelstein L . The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation, and Interpretation. Supplements to the Bulletin of the History of Medicine. vol.1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ Pr; 1943. Google Scholar - 2.
ABIM Foundation . American Board of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:243-6. [PMID: 11827500] LinkGoogle Scholar - 3. Federation of State Medical Boards. Model Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the Internet in Medical Practice. Dallas, TX: Federation of State Medical Boards; 2002. Accessed at www.fsmb.org/pdf/2002_grpol_Use_of_Internet.pdf on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 4.
Guseh JS ,Brendel RW ,Brendel DH . Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics. 2009;35:584-6. [PMID: 19717700] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 5.
Jain SH . Practicing medicine in the age of Facebook. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:649-51. [PMID: 19675328] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 6.
Greysen SR ,Kind T ,Chretien KC . Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:1227-9. [PMID: 20632121] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 7.
Mostaghimi A ,Crotty BH . Professionalism in the digital age. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:560-2. [PMID: 21502653] LinkGoogle Scholar - 8.
Thompson LA ,Dawson K ,Ferdig R ,Black EW ,Boyer J ,Coutts J ,et al . The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:954-7. [PMID: 18612723] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.
Lagu T ,Kaufman EJ ,Asch DA ,Armstrong K . Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1642-6. [PMID: 18649110] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.
Chretien KC ,Azar J ,Kind T . Physicians on Twitter. JAMA. 2011;305:566-8. [PMID: 21304081] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 11.
Chretien KC ,Greysen SR ,Chretien JP ,Kind T . Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302:1309-15. [PMID: 19773566] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 12.
Greysen SR ,Chretien KC ,Kind T ,Young A ,Gross CP . Physician violations of online professionalism and disciplinary actions: a national survey of state medical boards. JAMA. 2012;307:1141-2. [PMID: 22436951] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 13. Federation of State Medical Boards. Model Policy Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Social Media and Social Networking in Medical Practice. Accessed at www.fsmb.org/pdf/pub-social-media-guidelines.pdf on 25 November 2012. Google Scholar
- 14. American Medical Association. AMA Policy: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media. Accessed at www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/meeting/professionalism-social-media.shtml on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 15.
Shore R ,Halsey J ,Shah K ,Crigger BJ ,Douglas SP ;AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA) . Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22:165-72. [PMID: 21837888] MedlineGoogle Scholar - 16.
Morrison J ,Wickersham P . Physicians disciplined by a state medical board. JAMA. 1998;279:1889-93. [PMID: 9634260] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 17.
Khaliq AA ,Dimassi H ,Huang CY ,Narine L ,Smego RA . Disciplinary action against physicians: who is likely to get disciplined? Am J Med. 2005;118:773-7. [PMID: 15989912] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 18.
Suler J . The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7:321-6. [PMID: 15257832] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 19. Page ES. State investigates patient info shared on Facebook. NBC News. 8 June 2010. Accessed at www.nbcsandiego.com/news/health/State-Confirms-Tri-City-Investigation-95467764.html on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 20. CNN.com. Photos of drinking, grinning aid mission doctors cause uproar. 29 January 2010. Accessed at http://articles.cnn.com/2010-01-29/world/haiti.puerto.rico.doctors_1_doctors-hippocratic-oath-primera-hora-newspaper?_s=PM:WORLD on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 21. Young A, Chaudhry H, Rhyne J, Dugan M. A census of actively licensed physicians in the United States in 2010. Journal of Medical Regulation. 2011;96: 10-20. Accessed at www.fsmb.org/pdf/census.pdf on 3 December 2012. Google Scholar
- 22. Federation of State Medical Boards. Essentials of a Modern Medical and Osteopathic Practice Act. 12th ed. Dallas, TX: Federation of State Medical Boards; 2012. Accessed at www.fsmb.org/pdf/GRPOL_essentials.pdf on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 23. Federation of State Medical Boards. Addressing Sexual Boundaries: Guidelines for State Medical Boards. Accessed at www.fsmb.org/pdf/GRPOL>_Sexual%20Boundaries.pdf on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 24. American Medical Association. AMA Code of Medical Ethics. 2001. Accessed at www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 25.
Lagu T ,Greysen SR . Physician, monitor thyself: professionalism and accountability in the use of social media. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22:187-90. [PMID: 21837893] MedlineGoogle Scholar - 26.
Herrin B ,Ingram T . PHI faux pas: social media and the unauthorized disclosure of PHI. J Med Pract Manage. 2012;27:275-6. [PMID: 22594058] MedlineGoogle Scholar - 27. Federation of State Medical Boards. Policy on Physician Impairment from the Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Inc. 2011. Accessed at www.fsmb.org/pdf/jmr-phy-imp-policy.pdf on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 28.
Thompson LA ,Black E ,Duff WP ,Paradise Black N ,Saliba H ,Dawson K . Protected health information on social networking sites: ethical and legal considerations. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:8. [PMID: 21247862] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 29.
Farnan JM ,Higa J ,Paro J ,Reddy S ,Humphrey HJ ,Arora VM . Usage and perceptions of policy regarding digital media among medical trainees. Am J Bioethics: Primary Research. 2010;1:3-10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 30. Lenhart A. Adults and Social Network Websites. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 14 January 2009. Accessed at www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Adults-and-Social-Network-Websites.aspx on 19 August 2012. Google Scholar
- 31.
Kind T ,Greysen SR ,Chretien KC . Pediatric clerkship directors' social networking use and perceptions of online professionalism. Acad Pediatr. 2012;12:142-8. [PMID: 22306287] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 32.
Chretien KC ,Farnan JM ,Greysen SR ,Kind T . To friend or not to friend? Social networking and faculty perceptions of online professionalism. Acad Med. 2011;86:1545-50. [PMID: 22030752] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
S. Ryan Greysen,
From the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; Federation of State Medical Boards, Euless, Texas; Children's National Medical Center, George Washington University School of Medicine, and Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas.
Disclaimer: Dr. Greysen had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for their integrity and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars program and the Department of Veterans Affairs for support of this research. They also thank the key informants at state medical boards and the FSMB for their valuable insight into the structure and function of state medical and osteopathic boards.
Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M12-1641.
Corresponding Author: S. Ryan Greysen, MD, MHS, MA, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0131, San Francisco, CA 94113; e-mail, [email protected].
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Greysen: Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0131, San Francisco, CA 94113.
Mr. Johnson and Drs. Young and Chaudhry: Federation of State Medical Boards, 400 Fuller Wiser Road, Suite 300, Euless, TX 76039.
Dr. Kind: Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010.
Dr. Chretien: 11220 Upton Drive, Kensington, MD 20895.
Dr. Gross: Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, Box 208093, New Haven, CT 06520-8093.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: S.R. Greysen, D. Johnson, T. Kind, K.C. Chretien, C.P. Gross, A. Young, H.J. Chaudhry.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: S.R. Greysen, D. Johnson, T. Kind.
Drafting of the article: S.R. Greysen, K.C. Chretien.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: S.R. Greysen, D. Johnson, T. Kind, K.C. Chretien, C.P. Gross, A. Young, H.J. Chaudhry.
Final approval of the article: S.R. Greysen, D. Johnson, T. Kind, K.C. Chretien, C.P. Gross, A. Young, H.J. Chaudhry.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: C.P. Gross, A. Young, H.J. Chaudhry.
Collection and assembly of data: S.R. Greysen, A. Young, H.J. Chaudhry.
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
*All comments submitted after October 1, 2021 and selected for publication will be published online only.