Does Performance-Based Remuneration for Individual Health Care Practitioners Affect Patient Care?: A Systematic Review
Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 157, Number 12
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
Abstract
Background:
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is increasingly touted as a means to improve health care quality.
Purpose:
To evaluate the effect of P4P remuneration targeting individual health care providers.
Data Sources:
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, OpenSIGLE, Canadian Evaluation Society Unpublished Literature Bank, New York Academy of Medicine Library Grey Literature Collection, and reference lists were searched up until June 2012.
Study Selection:
Two reviewers independently identified original research papers (randomized, controlled trials; interrupted time series; uncontrolled and controlled before–after studies; and cohort comparisons).
Data Extraction:
Two reviewers independently extracted the data.
Data Synthesis:
The literature search identified 4 randomized, controlled trials; 5 interrupted time series; 3 controlled before–after studies; 1 nonrandomized, controlled study; 15 uncontrolled before–after studies; and 2 uncontrolled cohort studies. The variation in study quality, target conditions, and reported outcomes precluded meta-analysis. Uncontrolled studies (15 before–after studies, 2 cohort comparisons) suggested that P4P improves quality of care, but higher-quality studies with contemporaneous controls failed to confirm these findings. Two of the 4 randomized trials were negative, and the 2 statistically significant trials reported small incremental improvements in vaccination rates over usual care (absolute differences, 8.4 and 7.8 percentage points). Of the 5 interrupted time series, 2 did not detect any improvements in processes of care or clinical outcomes after P4P implementation, 1 reported initial statistically significant improvements in guideline adherence that dissipated over time, and 2 reported statistically significant improvements in blood pressure control in patients with diabetes balanced against statistically significant declines in hemoglobin A1c control.
Limitation:
Few methodologically robust studies compare P4P with other payment models for individual practitioners; most are small observational studies of variable quality.
Conclusion:
The effect of P4P targeting individual practitioners on quality of care and outcomes remains largely uncertain. Implementation of P4P models should be accompanied by robust evaluation plans.
Primary Funding Source:
None.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Canadian Medical Association. Health Care Transformation in Canada. Accessed at www.cma.ca/multimedia/CMA/Content_Images/Inside_cma/Advocacy/HCT/HCT-2010report_en.pdf on 4 February 2012.
2.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Roadmap for Implementing Value Driven Healthcare in the Traditional Medicare Fee-for-Service Program. Accessed at www.cms.gov/QualityInitiativesGenInfo/downloads/VBPRoadmap_OEA_1-16_508.pdf on 4 February 2012.
3.
Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM, Ma A, et al. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:486-96. [PMID: 17259444]
4.
Jha AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1606-15. [PMID: 22455751]
5.
Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:265-72. [PMID: 16908917]
6.
Scott A, Sivey P, Ait Ouakrim D, Willenberg L, Naccarella L, Furler J, et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;:CD008451. [PMID: 21901722]
7.
Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.0.2. Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Accessed at www.cochrane-handbook.org on 10 November 2011.
8.
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. Data extraction. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012. Accessed at http://epoc.cochrane.org/data-extraction on 4 July 2011.
9.
Fairbrother G, Siegel MJ, Friedman S, Kory PD, Butts GC. Impact of financial incentives on documented immunization rates in the inner city: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ambul Pediatr. 2001;1:206-12. [PMID: 11888402]
10.
Kouides RW, Bennett NM, Lewis B, Cappuccio JD, Barker WH, LaForce FM. Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. The Primary-Care Physicians of Monroe County. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:89-95. [PMID: 9631159]
11.
Armour BS, Friedman C, Pitts MM, Wike J, Alley L, Etchason J. The influence of year-end bonuses on colorectal cancer screening. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:617-24. [PMID: 15515994]
12.
Grady KE, Lemkau JP, Lee NR, Caddell C. Enhancing mammography referral in primary care. Prev Med. 1997;26:791-800. [PMID: 9388790]
13.
Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z, Epstein AM. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294:1788-93. [PMID: 16219882]
14.
Fagan PJ, Schuster AB, Boyd C, Marsteller JA, Griswold M, Murphy SM, et al. Chronic care improvement in primary care: evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:1763-82. [PMID: 20849553]
15.
Gavagan TF, Du H, Saver BG, Adams GJ, Graham DM, McCray R, et al. Effect of financial incentives on improvement in medical quality indicators for primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23:622-31. [PMID: 20823357]
16.
Morrow RW, Gooding AD, Clark C. Improving physicians' preventive health care behavior through peer review and financial incentives. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:165-9. [PMID: 7842155]
17.
Chung RS, Chernicoff HO, Nakao KA, Nickel RC, Legorreta AP. A quality-driven physician compensation model: four-year follow-up study. J Healthc Qual. 2003;25:31-7. [PMID: 14671855]
18.
Ettner SL, Thompson TJ, Stevens MR, Mangione CM, Kim C, Neil Steers W, et al; TRIAD Study Group. Are physician reimbursement strategies associated with processes of care and patient satisfaction for patients with diabetes in managed care? Health Serv Res. 2006;41:1221-41. [PMID: 16899004]
19.
Twardella D, Brenner H. Effects of practitioner education, practitioner payment and reimbursement of patients' drug costs on smoking cessation in primary care: a cluster randomised trial. Tob Control. 2007;16:15-21. [PMID: 17297068]
20.
Campbell SM, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Sibbald B, Roland M. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:368-78. [PMID: 19625717]
21.
Serumaga B, Ross-Degnan D, Avery AJ, Elliott RA, Majumdar SR, Zhang F, et al. Effect of pay for performance on the management and outcomes of hypertension in the United Kingdom: interrupted time series study. BMJ. 2011;342:d108. [PMID: 21266440]
22.
Vamos EP, Pape UJ, Bottle A, Hamilton FL, Curcin V, Ng A, et al. Association of practice size and pay-for-performance incentives with the quality of diabetes management in primary care. CMAJ. 2011;183:809-16. [PMID: 21810950]
23.
Alshamsan R, Lee JT, Majeed A, Netuveli G, Millett C. Effect of a UK pay-for-performance program on ethnic disparities in diabetes outcomes: interrupted time series analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10:228-34. [PMID: 22585887]
24.
MacBride-Stewart SP, Elton R, Walley T. Do quality incentives change prescribing patterns in primary care? An observational study in Scotland. Fam Pract. 2008;25:27-32. [PMID: 18245796]
25.
Beaulieu ND, Horrigan DR. Putting smart money to work for quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1318-34. [PMID: 16174136]
26.
Coleman T, Lewis S, Hubbard R, Smith C. Impact of contractual financial incentives on the ascertainment and management of smoking in primary care. Addiction. 2007;102:803-8. [PMID: 17506157]
27.
Doran T, Kontopantelis E, Valderas JM, Campbell S, Roland M, Salisbury C, et al. Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. BMJ. 2011;342:d3590. [PMID: 21712336]
28.
Greene RA, Beckman H, Chamberlain J, Partridge G, Miller M, Burden D, et al. Increasing adherence to a community-based guideline for acute sinusitis through education, physician profiling, and financial incentives. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:670-8. [PMID: 15521158]
29.
Kiran T, Victor JC, Kopp A, Shah BR, Glazier RH. The relationship between financial incentives and quality of diabetes care in Ontario, Canada. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1038-46. [PMID: 22456866]
30.
McGovern MP, Williams DJ, Hannaford PC, Taylor MW, Lefevre KE, Boroujerdi MA, et al. Introduction of a new incentive and target-based contract for family physicians in the UK: good for older patients with diabetes but less good for women? Diabet Med. 2008;25:1083-9. [PMID: 18937676]
31.
McGovern MP, Boroujerdi MA, Taylor MW, Williams DJ, Hannaford PC, Lefevre KE, et al. The effect of the UK incentive-based contract on the management of patients with coronary heart disease in primary care. Fam Pract. 2008;25:33-9. [PMID: 18222938]
32.
Millett C, Gray J, Saxena S, Netuveli G, Majeed A. Impact of a pay-for-performance incentive on support for smoking cessation and on smoking prevalence among people with diabetes. CMAJ. 2007;176:1705-10. [PMID: 17548383]
33.
Simpson CR, Hannaford PC, Ritchie LD, Sheikh A, Williams D. Impact of the pay-for-performance contract and the management of hypertension in Scottish primary care: a 6-year population-based repeated cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61:443-51. [PMID: 21722469]
34.
Simpson CR, Hannaford PC, Lefevre K, Williams D. Effect of the UK incentive-based contract on the management of patients with stroke in primary care. Stroke. 2006;37:2354-60. [PMID: 16873713]
35.
St Jacques PJ, Patel N, Higgins MS. Improving anesthesiologist performance through profiling and incentives. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16:523-8. [PMID: 15590256]
36.
Steel N, Maisey S, Clark A, Fleetcroft R, Howe A. Quality of clinical primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:449-54. [PMID: 17550669]
37.
Young GJ, Meterko M, Beckman H, Baker E, White B, Sautter KM, et al. Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:872-6. [PMID: 17443360]
38.
Pourat N, Rice T, Tai-Seale M, Bolan G, Nihalani J. Association between physician compensation methods and delivery of guideline-concordant STD care: is there a link? Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:426-32. [PMID: 16044979]
39.
Ramsay CR, Matowe L, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE. Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:613-23. [PMID: 15095767]
40.
Mannion R, Davies HT. Payment for performance in health care. BMJ. 2008;336:306-8. [PMID: 18258966]
41.
Pontes MC. Agency theory: a framework for analyzing physician services. Health Care Manage Rev. 1995;20:57-67. [PMID: 8543471]
42.
Guthrie B, Saultz JW, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL. Continuity of care matters. BMJ. 2008;337:a867. [PMID: 18687724]
43.
Maisey S, Steel N, Marsh R, Gillam S, Fleetcroft R, Howe A. Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:133-9. [PMID: 18573761]
44.
Hamblin R. Regulation, measurements and incentives. The experience in the US and UK: does context matter? J R Soc Promot Health. 2008;128:291-8. [PMID: 19058469]
45.
Kralewski JE, Rich EC, Feldman R, Dowd BE, Bernhardt T, Johnson C, et al. The effects of medical group practice and physician payment methods on costs of care. Health Serv Res. 2000;35:591-613. [PMID: 10966087]
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 157 • Number 12 • 18 December 2012
Pages: 889 - 899
History
Published online: 18 December 2012
Published in issue: 18 December 2012
Keywords
Copyright
© 2012 American College of Physicians.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Download article citation data for:
Does Performance-Based Remuneration for Individual Health Care Practitioners Affect Patient Care?: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med.2012;157:889-899. [Epub 18 December 2012]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00009
Does Performance-Based Remuneration for Individual Health Care Practitioners Affect Patient Care?: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med.2012;157:889-899. [Epub 18 December 2012]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00009
View More
Login Options:
Purchase
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.
Create your Free Account
You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.
Comments
0 Comments