Letters6 September 2011
    Author, Article and Disclosure Information

    TO THE EDITOR:

    The editorial comment by Avorn and Kesselheim (1) on recent systematic reviews of off-label use of rFVIIa raises concern about the “rapidly increasing use of a treatment that does not benefit patients and increases the risk for dangerous thrombotic events”—and “costs $10 000 per dose.” This concern, however, fails to consider the clinical context in which clinicians choose to administer rFVIIa, which is during refractory blood loss.

    When presented with a patient who continues to bleed despite administration of all available therapies, clinicians have 2 choices: Keep administering the standard interventions that have failed to work in that ...

    References

    • 1. Avorn J Kesselheim A A hemorrhage of off-label use [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med2011;154:566-7. [PMID: 21502655] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Logan AC Yank V Stafford RS Off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa in U.S. hospitals: analysis of hospital records. Ann Intern Med2011;154:516-22. [PMID: 21502649] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Karkouti K Beattie WS Arellano R Aye T Bussieres JS Callum JL et alComprehensive Canadian review of the off-label use of recombinant activated factor VII in cardiac surgery. Circulation2008;118:331-8. [PMID: 18606914] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Gill R Herbertson M Vuylsteke A Olsen PS von Heymann C Mythen M et alSafety and efficacy of recombinant activated factor VII: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in the setting of bleeding after cardiac surgery. Circulation2009;120:21-7. [PMID: 19546387] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Levi M Levy JH Andersen HF Truloff D Safety of recombinant activated factor VII in randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med2010;363:1791-800. [PMID: 21047223] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar