Articles4 September 2007
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
    Background:

    Estimates of the diagnostic performance of serologic testing and HLA-DQ typing for detecting celiac disease have mainly come from case–control studies.

    Objective:

    To define the performance of serologic testing and HLA-DQ typing prospectively.

    Design:

    Prospective cohort study.

    Setting:

    University hospital.

    Patients:

    Patients referred for small-bowel biopsy for the diagnosis of celiac disease.

    Interventions:

    Celiac serologic testing (antigliadin antibodies [AGA], antitransglutaminase antibodies [TGA], and antiendomysium antibodies [EMA]) and HLA-DQ typing.

    Measurements:

    Diagnostic performance of serologic testing and HLA-DQ typing compared with a reference standard of abnormal histologic findings and clinical resolution after a gluten-free diet.

    Results:

    Sixteen of 463 participants had celiac disease (prevalence, 3.46% [95% CI, 1.99% to 5.55%]). A positive result on both TGA and EMA testing had a sensitivity of 81% (CI, 54% to 95.9%), specificity of 99.3% (CI, 98.0% to 99.9%), and negative predictive value of 99.3% (CI, 98.0% to 99.9%). Testing positive for either HLA-DQ type maximized sensitivity (100% [CI, 79% to 100%]) and negative predictive value (100% [CI, 98.6% to 100%]), whereas testing negative for both minimized the negative likelihood ratio (0.00 [CI, 0.00 to 0.40]) and posttest probability (0% [CI, 0% to 1.4%]). The addition of HLA-DQ typing to TGA and EMA testing, and the addition of serologic testing to HLA-DQ typing, did not change test performance compared with either testing strategy alone.

    Limitation:

    Few cases of celiac disease precluded meaningful comparisons of testing strategies.

    Conclusions:

    In a patient population referred for symptoms and signs of celiac disease with a prevalence of celiac disease of 3.46%, TGA and EMA testing were the most sensitive serum antibody tests and a negative HLA-DQ type excluded the diagnosis. However, the addition of HLA-DQ typing to TGA and EMA testing, and the addition of serologic testing to HLA-DQ typing, provided the same measures of test performance as either testing strategy alone.

    References

    • 1. Rostom ADubé CCranney ASaloojee NSy RGarritty Cet alThe diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease: a systematic review. Gastroenterology2005;128:S38-46. [PMID: 15825125] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Hill IDWhat are the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for celiac disease? Do sensitivity and specificity vary in different populations? Gastroenterology2005;128:S25-32. [PMID: 15825123] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Corrao GCorazza GRAndreani MLTorchio PValentini RAGalatola Get alSerological screening of coeliac disease: choosing the optimal procedure according to various prevalence values. Gut1994;35:771-5. [PMID: 8020803] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Dieterich WLaag ESchöpper HVolta UFerguson AGillett Het alAutoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase as predictors of celiac disease. Gastroenterology1998;115:1317-21. [PMID: 9834256] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Baldas VTommasini ATrevisiol CBerti IFasano ASblattero Det alDevelopment of a novel rapid non-invasive screening test for coeliac disease. Gut2000;47:628-31. [PMID: 11034577] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Collin PKaukinen KVogelsang HKorponay-Szabó ISommer RSchreier Eet alAntiendomysial and antihuman recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a biopsy-proven European multicentre study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol2005;17:85-91. [PMID: 15647647] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Cranney ARostom ASy RDubé CSaloogee NGarritty Cet alConsequences of testing for celiac disease. Gastroenterology2005;128:S109-20. [PMID: 15825118] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Cummins AThompson FSensitivity of anti-endomysial antibody in detecting celiac disease [Letter]. Gastroenterology2002;122:246-7. [PMID: 11806372] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Green PHJabri BCoeliac disease. Lancet2003;362:383-91. [PMID: 12907013] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Lundin KEGjertsen HAScott HSollid LMThorsby EFunction of DQ2 and DQ8 as HLA susceptibility molecules in celiac disease. Hum Immunol1994;41:24-7. [PMID: 7836060] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Sollid LMMolecular basis of celiac disease. Annu Rev Immunol2000;18:53-81. [PMID: 10837052] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Schuppan DCurrent concepts of celiac disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology2000;119:234-42. [PMID: 10889174] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Mazzarella GMaglio MPaparo FNardone GStefanile RGreco Let alAn immunodominant DQ8 restricted gliadin peptide activates small intestinal immune response in in vitro cultured mucosa from HLA-DQ8 positive but not HLA-DQ8 negative coeliac patients. Gut2003;52:57-62. [PMID: 12477760] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Kagnoff MFOverview and pathogenesis of celiac disease. Gastroenterology2005;128:S10-8. [PMID: 15825116] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Collin PNew diagnostic findings in coeliac disease. Ann Med1999;31:399-405. [PMID: 10680854] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Csizmadia CGMearin MLOren AKromhout ACrusius JBvon Blomberg BMet alAccuracy and cost-effectiveness of a new strategy to screen for celiac disease in children with Down syndrome. J Pediatr2000;137:756-61. [PMID: 11113830] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA2000;284:3043-5. [PMID: 11122593] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. When is a coeliac a coeliac? Report of a working group of the United European Gastroenterology Week in Amsterdam, 2001. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol2001;13:1123-8. [PMID: 11564968] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Lerner AKumar VIancu TCImmunological diagnosis of childhood coeliac disease: comparison between antigliadin, antireticulin and antiendomysial antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol1994;95:78-82. [PMID: 8287612] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Dieterich WEhnis TBauer MDonner PVolta URiecken EOet alIdentification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease. Nat Med1997;3:797-801. [PMID: 9212111] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Schweizer JJvon Blomberg BMBueno-de Mesquita HBMearin MLCoeliac disease in The Netherlands. Scand J Gastroenterol2004;39:359-64. [PMID: 15125468] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Crusius JBThe immunogenetics of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune disease [PhD dissertation]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit; 2002. Google Scholar
    • 23. Marsh MNGluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology1992;102:330-54. [PMID: 1727768] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24. Wahab PJMeijer JWMulder CJHistologic follow-up of people with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet: slow and incomplete recovery. Am J Clin Pathol2002;118:459-63. [PMID: 12219789] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease. Report of Working Group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Arch Dis Child1990;65:909-11. [PMID: 2205160] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Altman DGDiagnostic tests.. In: Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ, eds. Statistics with Confidence. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000:105-19. Google Scholar
    • 27. Picarelli AMaiuri LMazzilli MCColetta SFerrante PDi Giovambattista Fet alGluten-sensitive disease with mild enteropathy. Gastroenterology1996;111:608-16. [PMID: 8780564] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Dickey WHughes DFMcMillan SAReliance on serum endomysial antibody testing underestimates the true prevalence of coeliac disease by one fifth. Scand J Gastroenterol2000;35:181-3. [PMID: 10720117] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Dickey WMcMillan SAHughes DFSensitivity of serum tissue transglutaminase antibodies for endomysial antibody positive and negative coeliac disease. Scand J Gastroenterol2001;36:511-4. [PMID: 11346205] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Dahele AVAldhous MCHumphreys KGhosh SSerum IgA tissue transglutaminase antibodies in coeliac disease and other gastrointestinal diseases. QJM2001;94:195-205. [PMID: 11294962] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Sanders DSCarter MJHurlstone DPPearce AWard AMMcAlindon MEet alAssociation of adult coeliac disease with irritable bowel syndrome: a case–control study in patients fulfilling ROME II criteria referred to secondary care. Lancet2001;358:1504-8. [PMID: 11705563] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32. Abrams JADiamond BRotterdam HGreen PHSeronegative celiac disease: increased prevalence with lesser degrees of villous atrophy. Dig Dis Sci2004;49:546-50. [PMID: 15185855] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33. Reeves GESquance MLDuggan AEMurugasu RRWilson RJWong RCet alDiagnostic accuracy of coeliac serological tests: a prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol2006;18:493-501. [PMID: 16607143] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34. Korponay-Szabó IRDahlbom ILaurila KKoskinen SWoolley NPartanen Jet alElevation of IgG antibodies against tissue transglutaminase as a diagnostic tool for coeliac disease in selective IgA deficiency. Gut2003;52:1567-71. [PMID: 14570724] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Sblattero DBerti ITrevisiol CMarzari RTommasini ABradbury Aet alHuman recombinant tissue transglutaminase ELISA: an innovative diagnostic assay for celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol2000;95:1253-7. [PMID: 10811336] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36. Wong RCWilson RJSteele RHRadford-Smith GAdelstein SA comparison of 13 guinea pig and human anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody ELISA kits. J Clin Pathol2002;55:488-94. [PMID: 12101191] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 37. Kaukinen KPartanen JMäki MCollin PHLA-DQ typing in the diagnosis of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol2002;97:695-9. [PMID: 11922565] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38. Dieterich WEsslinger BSchuppan DPathomechanisms in celiac disease. Int Arch Allergy Immunol2003;132:98-108. [PMID: 14600421] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 39. Vader WStepniak DKooy YMearin LThompson Avan Rood JJet alThe HLA-DQ2 gene dose effect in celiac disease is directly related to the magnitude and breadth of gluten-specific T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2003;100:12390-5. [PMID: 14530392] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 40. Wahab PJCrusius JBMeijer JWMulder CJGluten challenge in borderline gluten-sensitive enteropathy. Am J Gastroenterol2001;96:1464-9. [PMID: 11374684] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 41. Murdock AMJohnston SDDiagnostic criteria for coeliac disease: time for change? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol2005;17:41-3. [PMID: 15647639] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42. de Bakker PIMcVean GSabeti PCMiretti MMGreen TMarchini Jet alA high-resolution HLA and SNP haplotype map for disease association studies in the extended human MHC. Nat Genet2006;38:1166-72. [PMID: 16998491] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar