Articles15 August 2006
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information



Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease but require calibration of the serum creatinine assay to the laboratory that developed the equation. The 4-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study has been reexpressed for use with a standardized assay.


To describe the performance of the revised 4-variable MDRD Study equation and compare it with the performance of the 6-variable MDRD Study and Cockcroft–Gault equations.


Comparison of estimated and measured GFR.


15 clinical centers participating in a randomized, controlled trial.


1628 patients with chronic kidney disease participating in the MDRD Study.


Serum creatinine levels were calibrated to an assay traceable to isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Glomerular filtration rate was measured as urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate.


Mean measured GFR was 39.8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (SD, 21.2). Accuracy and precision of the revised 4-variable equation were similar to those of the original 6-variable equation and better than in the Cockcroft–Gault equation, even when the latter was corrected for bias, with 90%, 91%, 60%, and 83% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR, respectively. Differences between measured and estimated GFR were greater for all equations when the estimated GFR was 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or greater.


The MDRD Study included few patients with a GFR greater than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Equations were not compared in a separate study sample.


The 4-variable MDRD Study equation provides reasonably accurate GFR estimates in patients with chronic kidney disease and a measured GFR of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. By using the reexpressed MDRD Study equation with the standardized serum creatinine assay, clinical laboratories can report more accurate GFR estimates.

*For a list of investigators of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, see the Appendix.


  • 1. Levey ASCoresh JBalk EKausz ATLevin ASteffes MWet alNational Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med2003;139:137-47. [PMID: 12859163] LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Levey ASEckardt KUTsukamoto YLevin ACoresh JRossert Jet alDefinition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int2005;67:2089-100. [PMID: 15882252] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. National Kidney FoundationK/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis2002; 2 Suppl 1 S1-266. [PMID: 11904577] MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Wesson LPhysiology of the Human Kidney. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1969. Google Scholar
  • 5. Siegel N. Renal Express. Accessed at on 23 June 2006. Google Scholar
  • 6. National Kidney Disease Education Program. Information of Health Professionals. Creatinine Standardization Program. Accessed at on 9 February 2006. Google Scholar
  • 7. New Jersey State Senate, 211th Legislature. S2232 Madden: Bryant; 2005:1-2. Google Scholar
  • 8. Mathew THAustralasian Creatinine Consensus Working GroupChronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a position statement. Med J Aust2005;183:138-41. [PMID: 16053416] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. La Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie des Professions Indépendantes. Avenant à la convention nationale des directeurs de laboratoire privé d'analyses médicales. Accessed at on 8 November 2004. Google Scholar
  • 10. British Columbia Ministry of Health. Guidelines and Protocols, Advisory Committee. Accessed at on 21 October 2005. Google Scholar
  • 11. Levey ASBosch JPLewis JBGreene TRogers NRoth DA more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med1999;130:461-70. [PMID: 10075613] LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Levey ASGreene TKusek JBeck GA simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol2000;11:155A. Google Scholar
  • 13. Stevens LALevey ASClinical implications of estimating equations for glomerular filtration rate [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med2004;141:959-61. [PMID: 15611494] LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Poggio EDWang XGreene TVan Lente FHall PMPerformance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations in the estimation of GFR in health and in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol2005;16:459-66. [PMID: 15615823] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Lewis JAgodoa LCheek DGreene TMiddleton JO'Connor Det alComparison of cross-sectional renal function measurements in African Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis and of primary formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis2001;38:744-53. [PMID: 11576877] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Rule ADLarson TSBergstralh EJSlezak JMJacobsen SJCosio FGUsing serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med2004;141:929-37. [PMID: 15611490] LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Gonwa TAJennings LMai MLStark PCLevey ASKlintmalm GBEstimation of glomerular filtration rates before and after orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation of current equations. Liver Transpl2004;10:301-9. [PMID: 14762871] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Froissart MRossert JJacquot CPaillard MHouillier PPredictive performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol2005;16:763-73. [PMID: 15659562] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Hallan SAsberg ALindberg MJohnsen HValidation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula for estimating GFR with special emphasis on calibration of the serum creatinine assay. Am J Kidney Dis2004;44:84-93. [PMID: 15211442] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Lin JKnight ELHogan MLSingh AKA comparison of prediction equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in adults without kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol2003;14:2573-80. [PMID: 14514734] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Bostom AGKronenberg FRitz EPredictive performance of renal function equations for patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum creatinine levels. J Am Soc Nephrol2002;13:2140-4. [PMID: 12138147] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Zuo LMa YCZhou YHWang MXu GBWang HYApplication of GFR-estimating equations in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis2005;45:463-72. [PMID: 15754268] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Gaspari FFerrari SStucchi NCentemeri ECarrara FPellegrino Met alPerformance of different prediction equations for estimating renal function in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant2004;4:1826-35. [PMID: 15476483] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Lamb EJWebb MCSimpson DECoakley AJNewman DJO'Riordan SEEstimation of glomerular filtration rate in older patients with chronic renal insufficiency: is the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula an improvement? J Am Geriatr Soc2003;51:1012-7. [PMID: 12834524] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Vervoort GWillems HLWetzels JFAssessment of glomerular filtration rate in healthy subjects and normoalbuminuric diabetic patients: validity of a new (MDRD) prediction equation. Nephrol Dial Transplant2002;17:1909-13. [PMID: 12401845] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Skluzacek PASzewc RGNolan CRRiley DJLee SPergola PEPrediction of GFR in liver transplant candidates. Am J Kidney Dis2003;42:1169-76. [PMID: 14655188] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Ibrahim HMondress MTello AFan YKoopmeiners JThomas WAn alternative formula to the Cockcroft-Gault and the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases formulas in predicting GFR in individuals with type 1 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol2005;16:1051-60. [PMID: 15716336] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28. Rigalleau VLasseur CPerlemoine CBarthe NRaffaitin CLiu Cet alEstimation of glomerular filtration rate in diabetic subjects: Cockcroft formula or Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation? Diabetes Care2005;28:838-43. [PMID: 15793182] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29. Pöge UGerhardt TPalmedo HKlehr HUSauerbruch TWoitas RPMDRD equations for estimation of GFR in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant2005;5:1306-11. [PMID: 15888034] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30. Grubb ABjörk JLindström VSterner GBondesson PNyman UA cystatin C-based formula without anthropometric variables estimates glomerular filtration rate better than creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Scand J Clin Lab Invest2005;65:153-62. [PMID: 16025838] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31. Fehrman-Ekholm ISkeppholm LRenal function in the elderly (>70 years old) measured by means of iohexol clearance, serum creatinine, serum urea and estimated clearance. Scand J Urol Nephrol2004;38:73-7. [PMID: 15204431] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32. Coresh JStevens LAKidney function estimating equations: where do we stand? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens2006;15:276-84. [PMID: 16609295] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33. Coresh JAstor BCMcQuillan GKusek JGreene TVan Lente Fet alCalibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis2002;39:920-9. [PMID: 11979335] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34. Miller WGMyers GLAshwood ERKilleen AAWang EThienpont LMet alCreatinine measurement: state of the art in accuracy and interlaboratory harmonization. Arch Pathol Lab Med2005;129:297-304. [PMID: 15737021] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Murthy KStevens LAStark PCLevey ASVariation in the serum creatinine assay calibration: a practical application to glomerular filtration rate estimation. Kidney Int2005;68:1884-7. [PMID: 16164667] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36. Myers GLMiller WGCoresh JFleming JGreenberg NGreene Tet alRecommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem2006;52:5-18. [PMID: 16332993] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37. Levey ASCoresh JGreene TMarsh JStevens LAKusek Jet alExpressing the MDRD Study equation for estimating GFR with IDMS traceable (gold standard) serum creatinine values [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol2005;16:69A. Google Scholar
  • 38. Cockcroft DWGault MHPrediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron1976;16:31-41. [PMID: 1244564] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39. Junge WWilke BHalabi AKlein GDetermination of reference intervals for serum creatinine, creatinine excretion and creatinine clearance with an enzymatic and a modified Jaffé method. Clin Chim Acta2004;344:137-48. [PMID: 15149882] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40. Klahr SLevey ASBeck GJCaggiula AWHunsicker LKusek JWet alThe effects of dietary protein restriction and blood-pressure control on the progression of chronic renal disease. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med1994;330:877-84. [PMID: 8114857] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41. DeLong ERDeLong DMClarke-Pearson DLComparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics1988;44:837-45. [PMID: 3203132] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42. Cirillo MAnastasio PDe Santo NGRelationship of gender, age, and body mass index to errors in predicted kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant2005;20:1791-8. [PMID: 15998649] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43. Verhave JCFesler PRibstein Jdu Cailar GMimran AEstimation of renal function in subjects with normal serum creatinine levels: influence of age and body mass index. Am J Kidney Dis2005;46:233-41. [PMID: 16112041] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44. Rule ADGussak HMPond GRBergstralh EJStegall MDCosio FGet alMeasured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors. Am J Kidney Dis2004;43:112-9. [PMID: 14712434] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45. Greene TLi LCoresh JPoggio PSchimd CStark Pet alA statistical explanation for different relationships of serum creatinine (Scr) vs. GFR across populations: preliminary results [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol2005;16:319A. Google Scholar
  • 46. Stevens LALevey ASChronic kidney disease in the elderly—how to assess risk [Editorial]. N Engl J Med2005;352:2122-4. [PMID: 15901867] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 47. Coresh JStevens LAGreene TEggers OKusek JVan Lente Fet alComparison of GFR estimating equations using serum cystatin and creatinine: a pooled analysis of 1706 individuals [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol2005;16:69A. Google Scholar