Articles1 August 2006
A Cluster Randomized Trial
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
    Background:

    Inadequate blood pressure control is a persistent gap in quality care.

    Objective:

    To evaluate provider and patient interventions to improve blood pressure control.

    Design:

    Cluster randomized, controlled trial.

    Setting:

    2 hospital-based and 8 community-based clinics in the Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System.

    Patients:

    1341 veterans with essential hypertension cared for by 182 providers. Eligible patients had 2 or more blood pressure measurements greater than 140/90 mm Hg in a 6-month period and were taking a single antihypertensive agent.

    Intervention:

    Providers who cared for eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive an e-mail with a Web-based link to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) guidelines (provider education); provider education and a patient-specific hypertension computerized alert (provider education and alert); or provider education, hypertension alert, and patient education, in which patients were sent a letter advocating drug adherence, lifestyle modification, and conversations with providers (patient education).

    Measurements:

    Proportion of patients with a systolic blood pressure less than 140 mm Hg at 6 months; intensification of antihypertensive medication.

    Results:

    Mean baseline blood pressure was 157/83 mm Hg with no differences between groups (P = 0.105). Six-month follow-up data were available for 975 patients (73%). Patients of providers who were randomly assigned to the patient education group had better blood pressure control (138/75 mm Hg) than those in the provider education and alert or provider education alone groups (146/76 mm Hg and 145/78 mm Hg, respectively). More patients in the patient education group had a systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or less compared with those in the provider education or provider education and alert groups (adjusted relative risk for the patient education group compared with the provider education alone group, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.62]; P = 0.012).

    Limitations:

    Follow-up blood pressure measurements were missing for 27% of study patients. The study could not detect a mechanism by which patient education improved blood pressure control.

    Conclusions:

    A multifactorial intervention including patient education improved blood pressure control compared with provider education alone.

    References

    • 1. American Heart Association. Facts about high blood pressure, stroke, and heart profilers. Accessed at www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=2114 on 31 December 2003. Google Scholar
    • 2. Hyman DJPavlik VNVallbona CPhysician role in lack of awareness and control of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)2000;2:324-330. [PMID: 11416669] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Hyman DJPavlik VNPoor hypertension control: let's stop blaming the patients. Cleve Clin J Med2002;69:793-9. [PMID: 12371802] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Hyman DJPavlik VNSelf-reported hypertension treatment practices among primary care physicians: blood pressure thresholds, drug choices, and the role of guidelines and evidence-based medicine. Arch Intern Med2000;160:2281-6. [PMID: 10927724] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Chobanian AVBakris GLBlack HRCushman WCGreen LAIzzo JLet alThe Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA2003;289:2560-72. [PMID: 12748199] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Phillips LSBranch WTCook CBDoyle JPEl-Kebbi IMGallina DLet alClinical inertia. Ann Intern Med2001;135:825-34. [PMID: 11694107] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Berlowitz DRAsh ASHickey ECFriedman RHGlickman MKader Bet alInadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. N Engl J Med1998;339:1957-63. [PMID: 9869666] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. McGlynn EAAsch SMAdams JKeesey JHicks JDeCristofaro Aet alThe quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med2003;348:2635-45. [PMID: 12826639] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Hajjar IKotchen TATrends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000. JAMA2003;290:199-206. [PMID: 12851274] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Rolnick SJMargolis KLFortman KKMaciosek MVGrimm RHHow acceptable are financial incentives and written feedback for improving hypertension control? Perspectives from physicians, clinic administrators, and patients. Am J Manag Care2002;8:441-7. [PMID: 12019596] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Zillich AJCarter BLErnst MEKelly MWEffect of a telephone medication renewal service on blood pressure control. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash DC)2003;43:561-5. [PMID: 14626747] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Cushman WCFord CECutler JAMargolis KLDavis BRGrimm RHet alSuccess and predictors of blood pressure control in diverse North American settings: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)2002;4:393-404. [PMID: 12461301] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Carter BLMalone DCEllis SLDombrowski RCAntihypertensive drug utilization in hypertensive veterans with complex medication profiles. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)2000;2:172-180. [PMID: 11416643] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Carter BLZillich AJPharmaceutical care services for patients with hypertension [Editorial]. Ann Pharmacother2003;37:1335-7. [PMID: 12921520] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Carter BLZillich AJElliott WJHow pharmacists can assist physicians with controlling blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)2003;5:31-7. [PMID: 12556651] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Shapiro DGoldstein IBJamner LDEffects of anger/hostility, defensiveness, gender, and family history of hypertension on cardiovascular reactivity. Psychophysiology1995;32:425-35. [PMID: 7568636] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. O'Connor PJOvercome clinical inertia to control systolic blood pressure [Editorial]. Arch Intern Med2003;163:2677-8. [PMID: 14662620] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Renders CMValk GDGriffin SJWagner EHEijk Van JTAssendelft WJInterventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care2001;24:1821-33. [PMID: 11574449] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Cabana MDRand CSPowe NRWu AWWilson MHAbboud PAet alWhy don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA1999;282:1458-65. [PMID: 10535437] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Bodenheimer TWagner EHGrumbach KImproving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA2002;288:1909-14. [PMID: 12377092] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. O'Connor PJQuiter ESRush WAWiest MMeland JTRyu SImpact of hypertension guideline implementation on blood pressure control and drug use in primary care clinics. Jt Comm J Qual Improv1999;25:68-77. [PMID: 10027112] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Rothman AAWagner EHChronic illness management: what is the role of primary care? Ann Intern Med2003;138:256-61. [PMID: 12558376] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Sennett C. Implementing the new HEDIS hypertension performance measure. Manag Care. 2000;9:2-17; quiz 18-21. [PMID: 11729402] Google Scholar
    • 24. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg. JAMA1970;213:1143-52. [PMID: 4914579] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Stamler JStamler RNeaton JDBlood pressure, systolic and diastolic, and cardiovascular risks. US population data. Arch Intern Med1993;153:598-615. [PMID: 8439223] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Steiner JFKoepsell TDFihn SDInui TSA general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Description and validation. Med Care1988;26:814-23. [PMID: 3398608] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Steiner JFProchazka AVThe assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol1997;50:105-16. [PMID: 9048695] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Steiner JFRobbins LJRoth SCHammond WSThe effect of prescription size on acquisition of maintenance medications. J Gen Intern Med1993;8:306-10. [PMID: 8320574] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Grimshaw JMEccles MPWalker AEThomas REChanging physicians' behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof2002;22:237-43. [PMID: 12613059] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Davis DDoes CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med1998;28:21-39. [PMID: 9617647] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Davis DPhysician education, evidence and the coming of age of CME [Editorial]. J Gen Intern Med1996;11:705-6. [PMID: 9120659] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32. Ogden LGHe JLydick EWhelton PKLong-term absolute benefit of lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients according to the JNC VI risk stratification. Hypertension2000;35:539-43. [PMID: 10679494] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33. Neal BMacMahon SChapman NEffects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomised trials. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Lancet2000;356:1955-64. [PMID: 11130523] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34. Benetos AThomas FBean KGautier SSmulyan HGuize LPrognostic value of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in treated hypertensive men. Arch Intern Med2002;162:577-81. [PMID: 11871926] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Benetos AThomas FSafar MEBean KEGuize LShould diastolic and systolic blood pressure be considered for cardiovascular risk evaluation: a study in middle-aged men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol2001;37:163-8. [PMID: 11153732] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36. Pastor-Barriuso RBanegas JRDamián JAppel LJGuallar ESystolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure: an evaluation of their joint effect on mortality. Ann Intern Med2003;139:731-9. [PMID: 14597457] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 37. Onat ACeyhan KErer BBaşar OUysal OSansoy VSystolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures as coronary risk factors in a population with low cholesterol levels: a prospective 10-year evaluation. Clin Cardiol2003;26:91-7. [PMID: 12625600] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38. Lloyd-Jones DMEvans JCLarson MGO'Donnell CJRoccella EJLevy DDifferential control of systolic and diastolic blood pressure: factors associated with lack of blood pressure control in the community. Hypertension2000;36:594-9. [PMID: 11040241] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 39. Kannel WBHistoric perspectives on the relative contributions of diastolic and systolic blood pressure elevation to cardiovascular risk profile. Am Heart J1999;138:205-10. [PMID: 10467214] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 40. Austin PCMamdani MMTu KZwarenstein MChanges in prescribing patterns following publication of the ALLHAT trial [Letter]. JAMA2004;291:44-5. [PMID: 14709573] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 41. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA2002;288:2981-97. [PMID: 12479763] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42. Appel LJThe verdict from ALLHAT—thiazide diuretics are the preferred initial therapy for hypertension [Editorial]. JAMA2002;288:3039-42. [PMID: 12479770] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 43. Closing the Quality Gap: Hypertension Care Strategies. Fact Sheet. AHRQ Publication no. 04-P018. April 2004. Accessed at www.ahrq.gov/qual/hypertengap.htm on 24 May 2005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Google Scholar
    • 44. Bodenheimer TInterventions to improve chronic illness care: evaluating their effectiveness. Dis Manag2003;6:63-71. [PMID: 14577900] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 45. Davis DClinical practice guidelines and the translation of knowledge: the science of continuing medical education. CMAJ2000;163:1278-9. [PMID: 11107464] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 46. Davis DEvans MJadad APerrier LRath DRyan Det alThe case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ2003;327:33-5. [PMID: 12842955] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 47. Godfrey MMNelson ECWasson JHMohr JJBatalden PBMicrosystems in health care: Part 3. Planning patient-centered services. Jt Comm J Qual Saf2003;29:159-70. [PMID: 12698806] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 48. Hibbard JHEngaging health care consumers to improve the quality of care. Med Care2003;41:I61-70. [PMID: 12544817] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 49. Kassirer JPThe quality of care and the quality of measuring it [Editorial]. N Engl J Med1993;329:1263-5. [PMID: 8413394] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 50. Wagner EHAustin BTDavis CHindmarsh MSchaefer JBonomi AImproving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood)2001;20:64-78. [PMID: 11816692] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 51. Wagner THHu TWHibbard JHThe demand for consumer health information. J Health Econ2001;20:1059-75. [PMID: 11758048] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 52. St. George IMPatient education leaflet for hypertension: a controlled study. J R Coll Gen Pract1983;33:508-10. [PMID: 6193273] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 53. Murray DMKurth CLFinnegan JRPirie PLAdmire JBLuepker RVDirect mail as a prompt for follow-up care among persons at risk for hypertension. Am J Prev Med1988;4:331-5. [PMID: 3228529] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 54. Laher MO'Malley KO'Brien EO'Hanrahan MO'Boyle CEducational value of printed information for patients with hypertension. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)1981;282:1360-1. [PMID: 6786497] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 55. Watkins CJPapacosta AOChinn SMartin JA randomized, controlled trial of an information booklet for hypertensive patients in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract1987;37:548-50. [PMID: 3503941] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 56. Hunt JSSiemienczuk JTouchette DPayne NImpact of educational mailing on the blood pressure of primary care patients with mild hypertension. J Gen Intern Med2004;19:925-30. [PMID: 15333056] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 57. Goldstein MKLavori PColeman RAdvani AHoffman BBImproving adherence to guidelines for hypertension drug prescribing: cluster-randomized, controlled trial of general versus patient-specific recommendations. Am J Manag Care2005;11:677-85. [PMID: 16268751] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 58. Bosworth HBOlsen MKGoldstein MKOrr MDudley TMcCant Fet alThe veterans' study to improve the control of hypertension (V-STITCH): design and methodology. Contemp Clin Trials2005;26:155-68. [PMID: 15837438] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 59. Institute of MedicineCrossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, DC: National Academy Pr; 2001. Google Scholar