Background:
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism requires clinical probability assessment. Implicit assessment is accurate but is not standardized, and current prediction rules have shortcomings.
Objective:
To construct a simple score based entirely on clinical variables and independent from physicians' implicit judgment.
Design:
Derivation and external validation of the score in 2 independent management studies on pulmonary embolism diagnosis.
Setting:
Emergency departments of 3 university hospitals in Europe.
Patients:
Consecutive patients admitted for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism.
Measurements:
Collected data included demographic characteristics, risk factors, and clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of venous thromboembolism. The variables statistically significantly associated with pulmonary embolism in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Points were assigned according to the regression coefficients. The score was then externally validated in an independent cohort.
Results:
The score comprised 8 variables (points): age older than 65 years (1 point), previous deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (3 points), surgery or fracture within 1 month (2 points), active malignant condition (2 points), unilateral lower limb pain (3 points), hemoptysis (2 points), heart rate of 75 to 94 beats/min (3 points) or 95 beats/min or more (5 points), and pain on lower-limb deep venous palpation and unilateral edema (4 points). In the validation set, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 8% in the low-probability category (0 to 3 points), 28% in the intermediate-probability category (4 to 10 points), and 74% in the high-probability category (≥11 points).
Limitations:
Interobserver agreement for the score items was not studied.
Conclusions:
The proposed score is entirely standardized and is based on clinical variables. It has sustained internal and external validation and should now be tested for clinical usefulness in an outcome study.
References
- 1.
Wells PS ,Anderson DR ,Rodger M ,Stiell I ,Dreyer JF ,Barnes D ,et al . Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:98-107. [PMID: 11453709] LinkGoogle Scholar - 2.
Musset D ,Parent F ,Meyer G ,Maître S ,Girard P ,Leroyer C ,et al . Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet. 2002;360:1914-20. [PMID: 12493257] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 3.
Perrier A ,Bounameaux H . Cost-effective diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:475-87. [PMID: 11487038] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 4. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax. 2003;58:470-83. [PMID: 12775856] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 5. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism.Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1301-36. [PMID: 10952823] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 6.
Kruip MJ ,Leclercq MG ,van der Heul C ,Prins MH ,Büller HR . Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies.A systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:941-51. [PMID: 12809450] LinkGoogle Scholar - 7.
Perrier A ,Roy PM ,Aujesky D ,Chagnon I ,Howarth N ,Gourdier AL ,et al . Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med. 2004;116:291-9. [PMID: 14984813] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 8.
Perrier A ,Desmarais S ,Miron MJ ,de Moerloose P ,Lepage R ,Slosman D ,et al . Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999;353:190-5. [PMID: 9923874] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.
Kelly J ,Hunt BJ . A clinical probability assessment and D-dimer measurement should be the initial step in the investigation of suspected venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2003;124:1116-9. [PMID: 12970044] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.
Perrier A ,Nendaz MR ,Sarasin FP ,Howarth N ,Bounameaux H . Cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism including helical computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:39-44. [PMID: 12502474] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 11. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA. 1990;263:2753-9. [PMID: 2332918] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 12.
Perrier A ,Bounameaux H ,Morabia A ,de Moerloose P ,Slosman D ,Didier D ,et al . Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by a decision analysis-based strategy including clinical probability, D-dimer levels, and ultrasonography: a management study. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:531-6. [PMID: 8604959] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 13.
Wells PS ,Anderson DR ,Rodger M ,Ginsberg JS ,Kearon C ,Gent M ,et al . Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:416-20. [PMID: 10744147] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 14.
Wicki J ,Perneger TV ,Junod AF ,Bounameaux H ,Perrier A . Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:92-7. [PMID: 11146703] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 15.
Chagnon I ,Bounameaux H ,Aujesky D ,Roy PM ,Gourdier AL ,Cornuz J ,et al . Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2002;113:269-75. [PMID: 12361811] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 16.
Perrier A ,Roy PM ,Sanchez O ,Le Gal G ,Meyer G ,Gourdier AL ,et al . Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1760-8. [PMID: 15858185] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 17.
Cockcroft DW ,Gault MH . Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31-41. [PMID: 1244564] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 18.
Hersh AL ,Stefanick ML ,Stafford RS . National use of postmenopausal hormone therapy: annual trends and response to recent evidence. JAMA. 2004;291:47-53. [PMID: 14709575] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 19.
McNeil BJ ,Hanley JA ,Funkenstein HH ,Wallman J . Paired receiver operating characteristic curves and the effect of history on radiographic interpretation. CT of the head as a case study. Radiology. 1983;149:75-7. [PMID: 6611955] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 20.
Wasson JH ,Sox HC . Clinical prediction rules.Have they come of age? [Editorial]. JAMA. 1996;275:641-2. [PMID: 8594248] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 21.
Wyatt JC ,Altman DG . Commentary: prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten? BMJ. 1995;311:1539-41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 22.
Wasson JH ,Sox HC ,Neff RK ,Goldman L . Clinical prediction rules.Applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:793-9. [PMID: 3897864] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 23.
Wells PS ,Ginsberg JS ,Anderson DR ,Kearon C ,Gent M ,Turpie AG ,et al . Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:997-1005. [PMID: 9867786] LinkGoogle Scholar - 24.
Stein PD ,Hull RD ,Patel KC ,Olson RE ,Ghali WA ,Brant R ,et al . D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:589-602. [PMID: 15096330] LinkGoogle Scholar
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
From Brest University Hospital, Brest, France; Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Angers University Hospital, Angers, France; Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France; and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Grant Support: By the Hirsch Fund of the University of Geneva, the Swiss National Research Foundation (grant 32-61773.00), the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (grants 97/4-T10 and 00/4-T9), La Fondation Québécoise pour le Progrès de la Médecine Interne and Les Internistes et Rhumatologues Associés de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur, and the Direction of Clinical Research of the Angers University Hospital (grant 2001/021).
Disclosures: None disclosed.
Corresponding Author: Grégoire Le Gal, MD, EA 3878, Département de Médecine Interne et Pneumologie, CHU de la Cavale Blanche, 29609 Brest Cedex, France; e-mail, gregoire.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Le Gal: EA 3878, Département de Médecine Interne et Pneumologie, CHU de la Cavale Blanche, 29609 Brest Cedex, France.
Drs. Righini, Bounameaux, and Perrier: Geneva University Hospital, Rue Micheli du Crest 24, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Dr. Roy: Emergency Service, CHU, 4 Rue Larrey, 49033 Angers, France.
Dr. Sanchez: Service of Pneumology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
Dr. Aujesky: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: G. Le Gal, M. Righini, H. Bounameaux, A. Perrier.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: G. Le Gal, M. Righini, A. Perrier.
Drafting of the article: G. Le Gal, A. Perrier.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: M. Righini, D. Aujesky, H. Bounameaux.
Final approval of the article: G. Le Gal, M. Righini, P.-M. Roy, O. Sanchez, D. Aujesky, H. Bounameaux, A. Perrier.
Provision of study materials or patients: M. Righini, P.-M. Roy, O. Sanchez, D. Aujesky.
Statistical expertise: G. Le Gal.
Obtaining of funding: H. Bounameaux.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: O. Sanchez, H. Bounameaux.
Collection and assembly of data: P.-M. Roy, O. Sanchez.
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
*All comments submitted after October 1, 2021 and selected for publication will be published online only.