Articles7 February 2006
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information

    Abstract

    Background:

    International guidelines include several strategies for diagnosing pulmonary embolism with confidence, but little is known about how these guidelines are implemented in routine practice.

    Objective:

    To evaluate the appropriateness of diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism and the relationship between diagnostic criteria and outcome.

    Design:

    Prospective cohort study with a 3-month follow-up.

    Setting:

    116 emergency departments in France and 1 in Belgium.

    Patients:

    1529 consecutive outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

    Measurements:

    Appropriateness of diagnostic criteria according to international guidelines; incidence of thromboembolic events during follow-up.

    Results:

    Diagnostic management was inappropriate in 662 (43%) patients: 36 of 429 (8%) patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism and 626 of 1100 (57%) patients in whom pulmonary embolism was ruled out. Independent risk factors for inappropriate management were age older than 75 years (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.48 to 3.47]), known heart failure (odds ratio, 1.53 [CI, 1.11 to 2.12]), chronic lung disease (odds ratio, 1.39 [CI, 1.00 to 1.94]), current or recent pregnancy (odds ratio, 5.92 [CI, 1.81 to 19.30]), currently receiving anticoagulant treatment (odds ratio, 4.57 [CI, 2.51 to 8.31]), and the lack of a written diagnostic algorithm and clinical probability scoring in the emergency department (odds ratio, 2.54 [CI, 1.51 to 4.28]). Among patients who did not receive anticoagulant treatment, 44 had a thromboembolic event during follow-up: 5 of 418 (1.2%) patients who received appropriate management and 39 of 506 (7.7%) patients who received inappropriate management (absolute risk difference, 6.5 percentage points [CI, 4.0 to 9.1 percentage points]; P < 0.001). Inappropriateness was independently associated with thromboembolism occurrence (adjusted odds ratio, 4.29 [CI, 1.45 to 12.70]).

    Limitations:

    This was an observational study without evaluation of the risk for overdiagnosis.

    Conclusions:

    Diagnostic management that does not adhere to guidelines is frequent and harmful in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Several risk factors for inappropriateness constitute useful findings for subsequent interventions.

    *For members of the EMDEPU Study Group, see the Appendix.

    References

    • 1. American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies CommitteeClinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med2003;41:257-70. [PMID: 12548278] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Barritt DWJordan SCAnticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. A controlled trial. Lancet1960;1:1309-12. [PMID: 13797091] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Pineda LAHathwar VSGrant BJClinical suspicion of fatal pulmonary embolism. Chest2001;120:791-5. [PMID: 11555511] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Linkins LAChoi PTDouketis JDClinical impact of bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med2003;139:893-900. [PMID: 14644891] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Kline JAJohns KLColucciello SAIsrael EGNew diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med2000;35:168-80. [PMID: 10650235] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Chunilal SDEikelboom JWAttia JMiniati MPanju AASimel DLet alDoes this patient have pulmonary embolism? JAMA2003;290:2849-58. [PMID: 14657070] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Mountain DDiagnosing pulmonary embolism: a question of too much choice? Emerg Med (Fremantle)2003;15:250-62. [PMID: 12786647] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Miller ACBoldy DAPulmonary embolism guidelines: will they work? [Editorial]. Thorax2003;58:463. [PMID: 12775852] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Cockcroft DWGault MHPrediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron1976;16:31-41. [PMID: 1244564] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development GroupBritish Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax2003;58:470-83. [PMID: 12775856] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Kearon CDiagnosis of pulmonary embolism. CMAJ2003;168:183-94. [PMID: 12538548] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Kruip MJLeclercq MGvan der Heul CPrins MHBuller HRDiagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies. A systematic review. Ann Intern Med2003;138:941-51. [PMID: 12809450] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J2000;21:1301-36. [PMID: 10952823] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Fedullo PFTapson VFClinical practice. The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med2003;349:1247-56. [PMID: 14507950] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Peduzzi PConcato JKemper EHolford TRFeinstein ARA simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol1996;49:1373-9. [PMID: 8970487] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Stein PDTerrin MLHales CAPalevsky HISaltzman HAThompson BTet alClinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no preexisting cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest1991;100:598-603. [PMID: 1909617] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Chagnon IBounameaux HAujesky DRoy PMGourdier ALCornuz Jet alComparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med2002;113:269-75. [PMID: 12361811] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Grimshaw JMShirran LThomas RMowatt GFraser CBero Let alChanging provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care2001;39:II2-45. [PMID: 11583120] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Musset DParent FMeyer GMartre SGirard PLeroyer Cet alDiagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet2002;360:1914-20. [PMID: 12493257] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Perrier ARoy PMAujesky DChagnon IHowarth NGourdier ALet alDiagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, d-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med2004;116:291-9. [PMID: 14984813] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Schoepf UJGoldhaber SZCostello PSpiral computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation2004;109:2160-7. [PMID: 15136509] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Wells PSAnderson DRRodger MStiell IDreyer JFBarnes Det alExcluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med2001;135:98-107. [PMID: 11453709] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Perrier ADesmarais SMiron MJdeMoerloose PLepage RSlosman Det alNon-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet1999;353:190-5. [PMID: 9923874] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar