Perspectives21 September 2004
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information

    Abstract

    The profession of medicine is becoming feminized: The number of women enrolled in medical school and residency programs has increased dramatically over the past several decades. Some researchers have examined how women are faring in the profession, but few have considered how feminization of the profession will affect patient care and health care systems, as well as the profession itself. We predict that notable changes may emerge in 4 domains: the patient–physician relationship, the local delivery of care, the societal delivery of care, and the medical profession itself. We also consider the potential positive and negative consequences of a predominantly female physician workforce on these domains.

    References

    • 1. Women in U.S. Academic Medicine Statistics. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2003. Google Scholar
    • 2. Uhlenberg PCooney TMMale and female physicians: family and career comparisons. Soc Sci Med1990;30:373-8. [PMID: 2309131] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Doescher MPEllsbury KEHart LGThe distribution of rural female generalist physicians in the United States. J Rural Health2000;16:111-8. [PMID: 10981362] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Tesch BJWood HMHelwig ALNattinger ABPromotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA1995;273:1022-5. [PMID: 7897785] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Ginzberg EAn unfinished revolution: women and health care in America.. In: Friedman E, eds. The Woman Physician. New York: United Hospital Fund of New York; 1994:135-42. Google Scholar
    • 6. Wallace AEWeeks WBDifferences in income between male and female primary care physicians. J Am Med Womens Assoc2002;57:180-4. [PMID: 12405231] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Bickel JWara DAtkinson BFCohen LSDunn MHostler Set al Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: report of the AAMC Project Implementation Committee. Acad Med2002;77:1043-61. [PMID: 12377686] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Institute of MedicineCrossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Pr; 2001:39-60. Google Scholar
    • 9. Roter DLHall JAAoki YPhysician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA2002;288:756-64. [PMID: 12169083] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Hall JARoter DLMedical communication and gender: a summary of research. J Gend Specif Med1998;1:39-42. [PMID: 11281011] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Greenfield SKaplan SWare JEExpanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med1985;102:520-8. [PMID: 3977198] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Kaplan SHGreenfield SWare JEAssessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care1989;27:S110-27. [PMID: 2646486] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Stewart MAEffective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ1995;152:1423-33. [PMID: 7728691] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Cooper LARoter DLJohnson RLFord DESteinwachs DMPowe NRPatient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med2003;139:907-15. [PMID: 14644893] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Derose KPHays RDMcCaffrey DFBaker DWDoes physician gender affect satisfaction of men and women visiting the emergency department? J Gen Intern Med2001;16:218-26. [PMID: 11318922] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Franks PBertakis KDPhysician gender, patient gender, and primary care. J Womens Health (Larchmt)2003;12:73-80. [PMID: 12639371] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Pasko TSmart DRPhysician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S., 2004-2005. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2003. Google Scholar
    • 18. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) General Competencies. Accessed at www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFull.asp on 16 July 2004. Google Scholar
    • 19. Eagly AHJohnson BTGender and leadership style: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull1990;108:233-56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Eagly AHJohannesen-Schmidt MCvan Engen MLTransformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychol Bull2003;129:569-91. [PMID: 12848221] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Wagner EHThe role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ2000;320:569-72. [PMID: 10688568] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Sommers LSMarton KIBarbaccia JCRandolph JPhysician, nurse, and social worker collaboration in primary care for chronically ill seniors. Arch Intern Med2000;160:1825-33. [PMID: 10871977] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Crandall SJVolk RJCacy DA longitudinal investigation of medical student attitudes towards the medically indigent. Teaching and Learning in Medicine1997;9:254-60. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24. McCormick DHimmelstein DUWoolhandler SBor DHSingle-payer national health insurance. Physicians' views. Arch Intern Med2004;164:300-4. [PMID: 14769625] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Samuels MECochran CRShi LA profile of women medical directors in community and migrant health centers. J Ambul Care Manage2001;24:84-91. [PMID: 11189799] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Curran BACarson CNThe Lawyer Statistical Report: The U.S. Legal Profession in the 1990s. Chicago: American Bar Foundation; 1994. Google Scholar
    • 27. Hull KENelson RLAssimilation, choice, or constraint? Testing theories of gender differences in the careers of lawyers. Social Forces2000;79:229-64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Batchelor AJSenior women physicians: the question of retirement. N Y State J Med1990;90:292-4. [PMID: 2370985] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Spenny MLEllsbury KEPerceptions of practice among rural family physicians—is there a gender difference? J Am Board Fam Pract2000;13:183-7. [PMID: 10826866] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med2002;136:243-6. [PMID: 11827500] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Philibert IBickel JMaternity and parental leave policies at COTH hospitals: an update. Council of Teaching Hospitals. Acad Med1995;70:1056-8. [PMID: 7575938] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32. Grisso JAHansen LZelling IBickel JEisenberg JMParental leave policies for faculty in U.S. medical schools. Ann Intern Med1991;114:43-5. [PMID: 1983931] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 33. Yedidia MJBickel JWhy aren't there more women leaders in academic medicine? The views of clinical department chairs. Acad Med2001;76:453-65. [PMID: 11346523] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34. Curran BAWomen in the Law: A Look at the Numbers. Chicago: American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession; 1995. Google Scholar
    • 35. Daily CMCerto STDalton DRA decade of corporate women: some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal1999;20:93-9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 36. Nonnemaker LWomen physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med2000;342:399-405. [PMID: 10666431] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 37. Harden J“Mother Russia” at work: gender divisions in the medical profession. The European Journal of Women's Studies2001;8:181-99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 38. Barr DABoyle EHGender and professional purity: explaining formal and informal work rewards for physicians in Estonia. Gender & Society2001;15:29-54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 39. Robinson DDifferences in occupational earnings by sex. International Labour Review1998;137:3-31. Google Scholar