Articles6 May 2003
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
    Background:

    The optimal means of achieving therapeutic oral anticoagulation in the outpatient setting has not been determined.

    Objective:

    To compare a 10-mg dosing nomogram with a 5-mg nomogram that has been suggested to be sufficient for warfarin initiation.

    Design:

    Randomized, controlled clinical trial.

    Setting:

    Outpatient venous thromboembolism services of four tertiary care hospitals.

    Patients:

    201 of 210 consecutive patients with objectively confirmed diagnoses of acute venous thromboembolism.

    Intervention:

    All patients were treated with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for a minimum of 5 days until a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) was achieved. Patients were randomly assigned to initially receive a 10-mg or 5-mg dose of warfarin.

    Measurements:

    The primary end point was time in days to therapeutic INR. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day 5, the total number of INR assessments, the number of INR measurements greater than 5.0, incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding, and survival.

    Results:

    210 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 9 were excluded and 201 were randomly assigned to study groups (104 to the 10-mg group and 97 to the 5-mg group). Demographic characteristics of both groups were similar. Patients in the 10-mg group achieved therapeutic INR 1.4 days earlier than patients in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001). Eighty-three percent of patients in the 10-mg group achieved a therapeutic INR by day 5 versus 46% in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001). Fewer INR assessments were performed in the 10-mg group than in the 5-mg group (8.1 vs. 9.1; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two groups in recurrent events, major bleeding, survival, and number of INR measurements greater than 5.0.

    Conclusion:

    The 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram is superior to the 5-mg nomogram because it allows more rapid achievement of a therapeutic INR.

    References

    • 1. Weinmann EESalzman EWDeep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med1994;331:1630-41. [PMID: 7772110] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Levine MGent MHirsh JLeclerc JAnderson DWeitz Jet al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med1996;334:677-81. [PMID: 8594425] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. The Columbus Investigators. N Engl J Med1997;337:657-62. [PMID: 9280815] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Wells PSKovacs MJBormanis JForgie MAGoudie DMorrow Bet al. Expanding eligibility for outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a comparison of patient self-injection with homecare injection. Arch Intern Med1998;158:1809-12. [PMID: 9738611] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Kovacs MJCruickshank MWells PSKim HChin-Yee IMorrow Bet al. Randomized assessment of a warfarin nomogram for initial oral anticoagulation after venous thromboembolic disease. Haemostasis1998;28:62-9. [PMID: 10087430] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Kovacs MJAnderson DAWells PSProspective assessment of a nomogram for the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy for outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb2002;32:131-3. [PMID: 12372927] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Crowther MAHarrison LHirsh JWarfarin: less may be better [Letter]. Ann Intern Med1997;127:333. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Koopman MMPrandoni PPiovella FOckelford PABrandjes DPvan der Meer Jet al. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group. N Engl J Med1996;334:682-7. [PMID: 8594426] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Harrison LJohnston MMassicotte MPCrowther MMoffat KHirsh JComparison of 5-mg and 10-mg loading doses in initiation of warfarin therapy. Ann Intern Med1997;126:133-6. [PMID: 9005747] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Hirsh JLee AYHow we diagnose and treat deep vein thrombosis. Blood2002;99:3102-10. [PMID: 11964271] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Crowther MAGinsberg JBKearon CHarrison LJohnson JMassicotte MPet al. A randomized trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses. Arch Intern Med1999;159:46-8. [PMID: 9892329] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar