Homeopathy is a 200-year-old therapeutic system that uses small doses of various substances to stimulate autoregulatory and self-healing processes. Homeopathy selects substances by matching a patient's symptoms with symptoms produced by these substances in healthy individuals. Medicines are prepared by serial dilution and shaking, which proponents claim imprints information into water. Although many conventional physicians find such notions implausible, homeopathy had a prominent place in 19th-century health care and has recently undergone a worldwide revival. In the United States, patients who seek homeopathic care are more affluent and younger and more often seek treatment for subjective symptoms than those who seek conventional care. Homeopathic remedies were allowed by the 1939 Pure Food and Drug Act and are available over the counter. Some databoth from randomized, controlled trials and laboratory researchshow effects from homeopathic remedies that contradict the contemporary rational basis of medicine. Three independent systematic reviews of placebo-controlled trials on homeopathy reported that its effects seem to be more than placebo, and one review found its effects consistent with placebo. There is also evidence from randomized, controlled trials that homeopathy may be effective for the treatment of influenza, allergies, postoperative ileus, and childhood diarrhea. Evidence suggests that homeopathy is ineffective for migraine, delayed-onset muscle soreness, and influenza prevention. There is a lack of conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for most conditions. Homeopathy deserves an open-minded opportunity to demonstrate its value by using evidence-based principles, but it should not be substituted for proven therapies.
References
- 1.
Jonas WB ,Jacobs J . Healing with Homeopathy: The Complete Guide. New York: Warner; 1996. Google Scholar - 2.
Hahnemann S . Organon of Medicine. Los Angeles: JP Tarcher; 1982. Google Scholar - 3.
Maddox J ,Randi J ,Stewart WW . High-dilution experiments a delusion. Nature. 1988;334:287-91. [PMID:2455869 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 4.
Kent JT . What is homoeopathy? Homoeopathic Physician. 1885;5:346-51. Google Scholar - 5.
Linde K ,Jonas WB . Evaluating complementary and alternative medicine: the balance of rigor and relevance.. In: Jonas WB, Levin JS, eds. Essentials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999:57-71. Google Scholar - 6.
Haehl R . Samuel Hahnemann: His Life and Work. London: Homeopathic Publishing; 1922. Google Scholar - 7.
Rothstein WG . American Physicians in the 19th Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ Pr; 1992. Google Scholar - 8.
Roberts WH . Orthodoxy vs. homeopathy: ironic developments following the Flexner Report at the Ohio State University. Bull Hist Med. 1986;60:73-87. [PMID:3516284 ] MedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.
Persons S . The decline of homeopathythe University of Iowa, 1876-1919. Bull Hist Med. 1991;65:74-87. [PMID:2021694 ] MedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.
Coulter HL . Divided Legacy: The Conflict between Homeopathy and the American Medical Association. vol 3. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books; 1981. Google Scholar - 11.
Leland PW . Empiricism and its causes. Boston Medical Surgery Journal. 1852;47:283-90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 12. Parker WW. Was Hahnemann insane? JAMA. 1886:7-9. Google Scholar
- 13.
Joslin BF . Lecture on cholera. Eclectic Medical Journal. 1849;8:363-8. Google Scholar - 14.
Kaptchuk TJ . Intentional ignorance: a history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine. Bull Hist Med. 1998;72:389-433. [PMID:9780448 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 15.
Kaptchuk TJ . When does unbiased become biased? The dilemma of homeopathic proving and modern research methods. British Journal of Homeopathy. 1996;85:237-47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 16.
Cassedy J . American Medicine and Statistical Thinking, 18001860. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Pr; 1984. Google Scholar - 17.
Leary B . Cholera 1854: update. British Homeopathic Journal. 1994;83:117-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 18.
Fye WB . Nitroglycerin: a homeopathic remedy. Circulation. 1986;73:21-9. [PMID:2866851 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 19.
Nicholls PA . Homeopathy and the Medical Profession. London: Croom Helm; 1988. Google Scholar - 20.
Ernst E ,Kaptchuk TJ . Homeopathy revisited. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2162-4. [PMID:8885813 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 21.
Rogers N . An Alternative Path: The Making and Remaking of Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital in Philadelphia. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ Pr; 1998. Google Scholar - 22.
Mukherjee JK . The biological background of Hahnemannians vital force. Hahn Glean. 1964;31:163-8. Google Scholar - 23.
Eisenberg DM ,Davis RB ,Ettner SL ,Appel S ,Wilkey S ,Van Rompay M ,9820257 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 24.
Jacobs J ,Chapman EH ,Crothers D . Patient characteristics and practice patterns of physicians using homeopathy. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:537-40. [PMID:9821827 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 25. How to use high potencies. Homoeopathic Physician. 1882;2:73. Google Scholar
- 26.
Jonas WB ,Ernst E . The safety of homeopathy.. In: Jonas WB, Levin J, eds. Essentials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:167-71. Google Scholar - 27.
Hrbjartsson A ,Gtzsche PC . Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1594-602. [PMID:11372012 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 28.
Kleijnen J ,Knipschild P ,ter Riet G . Clinical trials of homoeopathy. BMJ. 1991;302:316-23. [PMID:1825800 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 29.
Linde K ,Clausius N ,Ramirez G ,Melchart D ,Eitel F ,Hedges LV ,9310601 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 30.
Linde K ,Melchart D . Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review. J Altern Complement Med. 1998;4:371-88. [PMID:9884175 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 31.
Ernst E . Classical homoeopathy versus conventional treatments: a systematic review. Perfusion. 1999;12:13-5. Google Scholar - 32.
Cucherat M ,Haugh MC ,Gooch M ,Boissel JP . Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. HMRAG. Homeopathic Medicines Research Advisory Group. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;56:27-33. [PMID:10853874 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 33.
Walach H . Unspezifische Therapie-Effekte. Das Beispiel Homopathie [PhD thesis]. Freiburg, Germany: Psychologische Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitt Freiburg; 1997. Google Scholar - 34.
Jadad AR ,McQuay HJ . Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:235-43. [PMID:8606325 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 35.
Egger M ,Juni P ,Holenstein F ,Sterne JA . Are the Clinical Effects of Homeopathy Bias Effects? Bristol, United Kingdom: Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol; 2001. Google Scholar - 36.
Lewin D . Meta-analysis: a new standard or clinical fool's gold. Journal of NIH Research. 1996;8:30-1. Google Scholar - 37.
Linde K ,Willich SN . How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med. 2003;96:17-22. [PMID:12519797 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 38.
Ernst E . Homeopathic prophylaxis of headaches and migraine? A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;18:353-7. [PMID:10584459 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 39.
Ernst E . Does homeopathic Arnica montana reduce delayed onset muscle soreness? A meta-analysis. Perfusion. 1997;11:29-35. Google Scholar - 40.
Ernst E ,Pittler MH . Efficacy of homeopathic arnica: a systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials. Arch Surg. 1998;133:1187-90. [PMID:9820349 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 41.
Ldtke R ,Wilkens J . Klinische Wirksamkeitsstudien zu Arnica in homopathischen Zubereitungen.. In: Albrecht H, Frhwald M, eds. Jahrbuch der Karl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung, Band 5 (1998). Essen, Germany: KVC-Verlag; 1999:97-112. Google Scholar - 42. Vickers AJ, Smith C. Homoeopathic Oscillococcinum for preventing and treating influenza and influenza-like syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; CD001957. [PMID: 10796675] Google Scholar
- 43.
Wiesenauer M ,Ldtke R . A meta-analysis of the homeopathic treatment of pollinosis with Galphimia glauca . Forsch Komplementrmed. 1996;3:230-6. Google Scholar - 44.
Barnes J ,Resch KL ,Ernst E . Homeopathy for postoperative ileus? A meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997;25:628-33. [PMID:9451677 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 45. Linde K, Jobst KA. Homeopathy for chronic asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; :CD000353. [PMID: 10796532] Google Scholar
- 46.
Jonas WB ,Linde K ,Ramirez G . Homeopathy and rheumatic disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2000;26:117-23, x. [PMID:10680199 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 47.
Taylor MA ,Reilly D ,Llewellyn-Jones RH ,McSharry C ,Aitchison TC . Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series. BMJ. 2000;321:471-6. [PMID:10948025 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 48.
Lewith GT ,Watkins AD ,Hyland ME ,Shaw S ,Broomfield JA ,Dolan G ,11872551 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 49.
Jacobs J ,Jimnez LM ,Gloyd SS ,Gale JL ,Crothers D . Treatment of acute childhood diarrhea with homeopathic medicine: a randomized clinical trial in Nicaragua. Pediatrics. 1994;93:719-25. [PMID:8165068 ] MedlineGoogle Scholar - 50. Jacobs J, Jonas WB, Jimenez-Perez M, Crothers D. Homeopathy for childhood diarrhea: combined results and meta-analysis from three randomized, controlled trials. Pediatr Infect Dis. 2003; [In press]. Google Scholar
- 51.
Jacobs JW ,Rasker JJ ,Van Riel PL ,Gribnau FW ,van de Putte LB . [Alternative treatment methods in rheumatic diseases; a literature review]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1991;135:317-22. [PMID:2008219 ] MedlineGoogle Scholar - 52.
Davenas E ,Beauvais F ,Amara J ,Oberbaum M ,Robinzon B ,Miadonna A ,2455231 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 53.
Hirst SJ ,Hayes NA ,Burridge J ,Pearce FL ,Foreman JC . Human basophil degranulation is not triggered by very dilute antiserum against human IgE. Nature. 1993;366:525-7. [PMID:8255290 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 54.
Ovelgnne JH ,Bol AW ,Hop WC ,van Wijk R . Mechanical agitation of very dilute antiserum against IgE has no effect on basophil staining properties. Experientia. 1992;48:504-8. [PMID:1376282 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 55.
Jonas WB ,Lin Y ,Williams A ,Tortella R ,Tuma R . Treatment of experimental stroke with low-dose glutamate and homeopathic Arnica Montana. Perfusion. 1999;12:452-62. Google Scholar - 56.
Jonas WB ,Dillner DK . Protection of mice from tularemia infection with ultra-low, serial agitated dilutions prepared from F. tularensis-infected tissue. Journal of Scientific Exploration. 2000;14:35-52. Google Scholar - 57.
Jonas W ,Lin Y ,Tortella F . Neuroprotection from glutamate toxicity with ultra-low dose glutamate. Neuroreports. 2001;12:335-9. [PMID:11209946 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 58.
Belon P ,Cumps J ,Ennis M ,Mannaioni PF ,Sainte-Laudy J ,Roberfroid M ,Suppl 1 S17-8. [PMID:10350142 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 59.
Linde K ,Jonas WB ,Melchart D ,Worku F ,Wagner H ,Eitel F . Critical review and meta-analysis of serial agitated dilutions in experimental toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1994;13:481-92. [PMID:7917505 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 60.
Vickers AJ . Independent replication of pre-clinical research in homeopathy: a systematic review. Forsch Komplementarmed. 1999;6:311-20. [PMID:10649002 ] MedlineGoogle Scholar - 61.
Jonas WB ,Anderson RL ,Crawford CC ,Lyons JS . A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic clinical trials. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2001;1:12. [PMID:11801202 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 62.
Jonas WB . The homeopathy debate [Letter]. J Altern Complement Med. 2000;6:213-5. [PMID:10890328 ] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
From Samueli Institute for Information Biology and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Centre for Complementary Medicine Research, Technische Universitt, Mnchen, Germany.
Disclaimer: The views, opinions, and assertions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect official policy of the Department of Defense, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the U.S. Government.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Cindy Crawford for her assistance in preparation of this manuscript and Ronald A. Chez, MD, for his editorial review.
Grant Support: In part by the Samueli Institute for Information Biology and National Institutes of Health grants (AT00178-01 and AT00270-01).
Corresponding Author: Wayne B. Jonas, MD, Samueli Institute, 121 South Saint Asaph Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314; e-mail, [email protected]
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Jonas: Samueli Institute, 121 South Saint Asaph Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Dr. Kaptchuk: Osher Institute, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215.
Dr. Linde: Projekt Mnchener Modell, University of Mnich, Zentrum f. naturheilkundliche, Kaiserstrasse. 9, D-80801 Mnchen, Germany.
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
*All comments submitted after October 1, 2021 and selected for publication will be published online only.