Academia and Clinic3 June 2003
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
    Background:

    Few treatments for back pain are supported by strong scientific evidence. Conventional treatments, although widely used, have had limited success. Dissatisfied patients have, therefore, turned to complementary and alternative medical therapies and providers for care for back pain.

    Purpose:

    To provide a rigorous and balanced summary of the best available evidence about the effectiveness, safety, and costs of the most popular complementary and alternative medical therapies used to treat back pain.

    Data Sources:

    MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.

    Study Selection:

    Systematic reviews of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that were published since 1995 and that evaluated acupuncture, massage therapy, or spinal manipulation for nonspecific back pain and RCTs published since the reviews were conducted.

    Data Extraction:

    Two authors independently extracted data from the reviews (including number of RCTs, type of back pain, quality assessment, and conclusions) and original articles (including type of pain, comparison treatments, sample size, outcomes, follow-up intervals, loss to follow-up, and authors' conclusions).

    Data Synthesis:

    Because the quality of the 20 RCTs that evaluated acupuncture was generally poor, the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating acute or chronic back pain is unclear. The three RCTs that evaluated massage reported that this therapy is effective for subacute and chronic back pain. A meta-regression analysis of the results of 26 RCTs evaluating spinal manipulation for acute and chronic back pain reported that spinal manipulation was superior to sham therapies and therapies judged to have no evidence of a benefit but was not superior to effective conventional treatments.

    Conclusions:

    Initial studies have found massage to be effective for persistent back pain. Spinal manipulation has small clinical benefits that are equivalent to those of other commonly used therapies. The effectiveness of acupuncture remains unclear. All of these treatments seem to be relatively safe. Preliminary evidence suggests that massage, but not acupuncture or spinal manipulation, may reduce the costs of care after an initial course of therapy.

    References

    • 1. Deyo RACherkin DConrad DVolinn ECost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health1991;12:141-56. [PMID: 1828670] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Sternbach RASurvey of pain in the United States: the Nuprin pain report. Clin J Pain1986;2:49-53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Frymoyer JWCats-Baril WLAn overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am1991;22:263-71. [PMID: 1826550] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G, Brown K, Deyo R, Haldeman S, et al. Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 14. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; December 1994. AHCPR publication no. 95-0642. Google Scholar
    • 5. van Tulder MWKoes BWBouter LMConservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine1997;22:2128-56. [PMID: 9322325] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. How is your doctor treating you? Consumer Reports. 1995; Feb:81-8. Google Scholar
    • 7. Eisenberg DMDavis RBEttner SLAppel SWilkey SVan Rompay M Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA1998;280:1569-75. [PMID: 9820257] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Cherkin DCDeyo RASherman KJHart LGStreet JHHrbek A Characteristics of visits to licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, massage therapists, and naturopathic physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract2002;15:463-72. [PMID: 12463292] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Shekelle PGAdams AHChassin MRHurwitz ELBrook RHSpinal manipulation for low-back pain. Ann Intern Med1992;117:590-8. [PMID: 1388006] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Sandefur R, Coulter ID. Licensure and Legal Scope of Practice. In: Cherkin DC, Mootz RD, eds. Chiropractic in the United States: Training Practice and Research. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research; December 1997:33. AHCPR publication no. 98 N002. Google Scholar
    • 11. Jensen GARoychoudhury CCherkin DCEmployer-sponsored health insurance for chiropractic services. Med Care1998;36:544-53. [PMID: 9544594] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. American Massage Therapy Association. Accessed at www.amtamassage.org on 19 November 2002. Google Scholar
    • 13. van Tulder MWAssendelft WJKoes BWBouter LMMethod guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders [Editorial]. Spine1997;22:2323-30. [PMID: 9355211] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Nyiendo JHaas MGoldberg BSexton GPatient characteristics and physicians' practice activities for patients with chronic low back pain: a practice-based study of primary care and chiropractic physicians. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2001;24:92-100. [PMID: 11208221] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Coulter ID, Hurwitz EL, Adams AH, Genovese BJ, Hays R, Shekelle PG. Patients using chiropractors in North America: who are they, and why are they in chiropractic care? Spine. 2002; 27:291-6; discussion 297-8. [PMID: 11805694] Google Scholar
    • 16. NIH Consensus Conference. Acupuncture. JAMA1998;280:1518-24. [PMID: 9809733] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Ernst EWhite ARAcupuncture for back pain: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Arch Intern Med1998;158:2235-41. [PMID: 9818803] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Jadad ARMoore RACarroll DJenkinson CReynolds DJGavaghan DJ Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials1996;17:1-12. [PMID: 8721797] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. van Tulder MWCherkin DCBerman BLao LKoes BWThe effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of acute and chronic low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine1999;24:1113-23. [PMID: 10361661] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Smith LAOldman ADMcQuay HJMoore RATeasing apart quality and validity in systematic reviews: an example from acupuncture trials in chronic neck and back pain. Pain2000;86:119-32. [PMID: 10779669] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Ernst EMassage therapy for low back pain: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage1999;17:65-9. [PMID: 9919867] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Furlan AD, Brosseau L, Welch V, Wong J. Massage for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000:CD001929. [PMID: 11034734] Google Scholar
    • 23. Koes BW, Assendelft WJ, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM. Spinal manipulation for low back pain. An updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Spine. 1996; 21:2860-71; discussion 2872-3. [PMID: 9112710] Google Scholar
    • 24. Koes BWAssendelft WJvan der Heijden GJBouter LMKnipschild PGSpinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: a blinded review. BMJ1991;303:1298-303. [PMID: 1836153] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Bronfort GSpinal manipulation: current state of research and its indications. Neurol Clin1999;17:91-111. [PMID: 9855673] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Assendelft WJMorton SCYu EISuttorp MJShekelle PGSpinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. Meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Ann Intern Med2003;138:871-81. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Giles LGMller RChronic spinal pain syndromes: a clinical pilot trial comparing acupuncture, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and spinal manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther1999;22:376-81. [PMID: 10478769] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Grant DJBishop-Miller JWinchester DMAnderson MFaulkner SA randomized comparative trial of acupuncture versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic back pain in the elderly. Pain1999;82:9-13. [PMID: 10422654] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Carlsson CPSjlund BHAcupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled study with long-term follow-up. Clin J Pain2001;17:296-305. [PMID: 11783809] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Cherkin DCEisenberg DSherman KJBarlow WKaptchuk TJStreet J Randomized trial comparing traditional Chinese medical acupuncture, therapeutic massage, and self-care education for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med2001;161:1081-8. [PMID: 11322842] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Kittang GMelvaer TBaerheim A[Acupuncture contra antiphlogistics in acute lumbago]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen2001;121:1207-10. [PMID: 11402745] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32. Leibing ELeonhardt UKoster GGoerlitz ARosenfeldt JAHilgers R Acupuncture treatment of chronic low-back paina randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 9-month follow-up. Pain2002;96:189-96. [PMID: 11932074] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33. Preyde MEffectiveness of massage therapy for subacute low-back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. CMAJ2000;162:1815-20. [PMID: 10906914] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34. Hernandez-Reif MField TKrasnegor JTheakston HLower back pain is reduced and range of motion increased after massage therapy. Int J Neurosci2001;106:131-45. [PMID: 11264915] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Milne S, Welch V, Brosseau L, Saginur M, Shea B, Tugwell P, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001:CD003008. [PMID: 11406059] Google Scholar
    • 36. Lytle CD. An overview of acupuncture. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration; May 1993. Google Scholar
    • 37. MacPherson HThomas KWalters SFitter MThe York acupuncture safety study: prospective survey of 34 000 treatments by traditional acupuncturists. BMJ2001;323:486-7. [PMID: 11532841] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38. White AHayhoe SHart AErnst EAdverse events following acupuncture: prospective survey of 32 000 consultations with doctors and physiotherapists. BMJ2001;323:485-6. [PMID: 11532840] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 39. Ernst EWhite ARProspective studies of the safety of acupuncture: a systematic review. Am J Med2001;110:481-5. [PMID: 11331060] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 40. Odsberg ASchill UHaker EAcupuncture treatment: side effects and complications reported by Swedish physiotherapists. Complement Ther Med2001;9:17-20. [PMID: 11264965] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 41. Ernst EedsThe Desktop Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine: An Evidence-Based Approach. Edinburgh: Mosby; 2001:60-1. Google Scholar
    • 42. Senstad O, Leboeuf-Yde C, Borchgrevink C. Frequency and characteristics of side effects of spinal manipulative therapy. Spine. 1997; 22:435-40; discussion 440-1. [PMID: 9055373] Google Scholar
    • 43. Assendelft WJBouter LMKnipschild PGComplications of spinal manipulation: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Fam Pract1996;42:475-80. [PMID: 8642364] MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44. Cherkin DCDeyo RABattie MStreet JBarlow WA comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med1998;339:1021-9. [PMID: 9761803] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 45. Skargren EI, Carlsson PG, Oberg BE. One-year follow-up comparison of the cost and effectiveness of chiropractic and physiotherapy as primary management for back pain. Subgroup analysis, recurrence, and additional health care utilization. Spine. 1998; 23:1875-83; discussion 1884. [PMID: 9762745] Google Scholar
    • 46. Crow RGage HHampson SHart JKimber AThomas HThe role of expectancies in the placebo effect and their use in the delivery of health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess1999;3:1-96. [PMID: 10448203] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 47. Kalauokalani DCherkin DCSherman KJKoepsell TDDeyo RALessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effects. Spine2001;26:1418-24. [PMID: 11458142] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 48. Mondloch MVCole DCFrank JWDoes how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ2001;165:174-9. [PMID: 11501456] MedlineGoogle Scholar