Academia and Clinic
1 October 2002

Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging

Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 137, Number 7

Abstract

Purpose:

To review evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical information and imaging for patients with low back pain in primary care settings.

Data Source:

MEDLINE search (January 1966 to September 2001) for articles and reviews relevant to the accuracy of the clinical and radiographic examination of patients with low back pain.

Study Selection:

The authors reviewed abstracts and selected articles for review on the basis of a combined judgment. Data on the clinical examination were based primarily on recent systematic reviews; data on imaging tests were based primarily on original articles.

Data Extraction:

Diagnostic results were extracted by one or the other author. Quality of methods was evaluated informally. Major potential biases were identified, but neither quantitative data extraction nor scoring was done.

Data Synthesis:

Formal meta-analysis was not used because the diagnostic hardware and software, gold standards, and patient selection methods were heterogeneous and the number of studies was small. Sensitivity for cancer was highest for magnetic resonance imaging (0.83 to 0.93) and radionuclide scanning (0.74 to 0.98); specificity was highest for magnetic resonance imaging (0.9 to 0.97) and radiography (0.95 to 0.99). Magnetic resonance imaging was the most sensitive (0.96) and specific (0.92) test for infection. The sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging for herniated discs were slightly higher than those for computed tomography but very similar for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

Conclusions:

The data suggest a diagnostic strategy similar to the 1994 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines. For adults younger than 50 years of age with no signs or symptoms of systemic disease, symptomatic therapy without imaging is appropriate. For patients 50 years of age and older or those whose findings suggest systemic disease, plain radiography and simple laboratory tests can almost completely rule out underlying systemic diseases. Advanced imaging should be reserved for patients who are considering surgery or those in whom systemic disease is strongly suspected.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:291-300. [PMID: 2961994]
2.
Barondess JA. The future of generalism. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:153-60. [PMID: 8512164]
3.
Salkever D. Morbidity Cost: National Estimates and Economic Determinants. 1985. Report No. (PHS) 86-3343.
4.
Deyo RA. Early diagnostic evaluation of low back pain. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:328-38. [PMID: 2945917]
5.
Deyo RAWeinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:363-70. [PMID: 11172169]
6.
Hart LGDeyo RACherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey. Spine. 1995;20:11-9. [PMID: 7709270]
7.
Deyo RARainville JKent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA. 1992;268:760-5. [PMID: 1386391]
8.
Deyo RADiehl AK. Cancer as a cause of back pain: frequency, clinical presentation, and diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:230-8. [PMID: 2967893]
9.
White AA 3rdGordon SL. Synopsis: workshop on idiopathic low-back pain. Spine. 1982;7:141-9. [PMID: 6211779]
10.
van Tulder MWAssendelft WJKoes BWBouter LM. Spinal radiographic findings and nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of observational studies. Spine. 1997;22:427-34. [PMID: 9055372]
11.
Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Khurana S, Hayward C, Welsh J, Date E, et al. The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. Spine. 2000; 25:1373-80; discussion 1381. [ 10828919]
12.
Smith SE, Darden BV, Rhyne AL, Wood KE. Outcome of unoperated discogram-positive low back pain. Spine. 1995; 20:1997-2000; discussion 2000-1. [ 8578375]
13.
Waldvogel FAPapageorgiou PS. Osteomyelitis: the past decade. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:360-70. [PMID: 6993944]
14.
Deyo RATsui-Wu YJ. Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States. Spine. 1987;12:264-8. [PMID: 2954221]
15.
Spangfort EV. The lumbar disc herniation. A computer-aided analysis of 2,504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1972;142:1-95. [PMID: 4516334]
16.
Katz JNDalgas MStucki GKatz NPBayley JFossel AHet al . Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1236-41. [PMID: 7575718]
17.
Gran JY. An epidemiological survey of the signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 1985;4:161-9.
18.
Bauer RLDeyo RA. Low risk of vertebral fracture in Mexican American women. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1437-9. [PMID: 3498450]
19.
Calin AKaye BSternberg MAntell BChan M. The prevalence and nature of back pain in an industrial complex: a questionnaire and radiographic and HLA analysis. Spine. 1980;5:201-5. [PMID: 6446164]
20.
Boden SDDavis DODina TSPatronas NJWiesel SW. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:403-8. [PMID: 2312537]
21.
Jensen MCBrant-Zawadzki MNObuchowski NModic MTMalkasian DRoss JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:69-73. [PMID: 8208267]
22.
Boos NRieder RSchade VSpratt KFSemmer NAebi M. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations. Spine. 1995;20:2613-25. [PMID: 8747239]
23.
Jarvik JJHollingworth WHeagerty PHaynor DRDeyo RA. The Longitudinal Assessment of Imaging and Disability of the Back (LAIDBack) Study: baseline data. Spine. 2001;26:1158-66. [PMID: 11413431]
24.
Currey HLGreenwood RMLloyd GGMurray RS. A prospective study of low back pain. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979;18:94-104. [PMID: 156391]
25.
van den Hoogen HMKoes BWvan Eijk JTBouter LM. On the accuracy of history, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing low back pain in general practice. A criteria-based review of the literature. Spine. 1995;20:318-27. [PMID: 7732468]
26.
Turner JAErsek MHerron LDeyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine. 1992;17:1-8. [PMID: 1531550]
27.
Robbins SEMorse MH. Is the acquisition of a separate view of the sacroiliac joints in the prone position justified in patients with back pain? Clin Radiol. 1996;51:637-8. [PMID: 8810693]
28.
Scavone JGLatshaw RFWeidner WA. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs: an adequate lumbar spine examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136:715-7. [PMID: 6784466]
29.
Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G, Brown K, Deyo RA, Haldeman S, et al. Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 14. Report No. 95-0642. December 1994.
30.
Hall FM. Overutilization of radiological examinations. Radiology. 1976;120:443-8. [PMID: 778913]
31.
Webster EMerrill O. Radiation hazards: II. Measurements of gonadal dose in radiologic examinations. N Engl J Med. 1957;257:811-9.
32.
Antoku SRussell WJ. Dose to the active bone marrow, gonads, and skin from roentgenography and fluoroscopy. Radiology. 1971;101:669-78. [PMID: 5129110]
33.
Sartoris DJAndré MResnik CSResnick DResnick C. Trabecular bone density in the proximal femur: quantitative CT assessment. Work in progress. Radiology. 1986;160:707-12. [PMID: 3755536]
34.
Sartoris DJClopton PNemcek ADowd CResnick D. Vertebral-body collapse in focal and diffuse disease: patterns of pathologic processes. Radiology. 1986;160:479-83. [PMID: 3726130]
35.
Modic MTFeiglin DHPiraino DWBoumphrey FWeinstein MADuchesneau PMet al . Vertebral osteomyelitis: assessment using MR. Radiology. 1985;157:157-66. [PMID: 3875878]
36.
Cooper CShah SHand DJAdams JCompston JDavie Met al . Screening for vertebral osteoporosis using individual risk factors. The Multicentre Vertebral Fracture Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1991;2:48-53. [PMID: 1790421]
37.
Spector TDMcCloskey EVDoyle DVKanis JA. Prevalence of vertebral fracture in women and the relationship with bone density and symptoms: the Chingford Study. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8:817-22. [PMID: 8352064]
38.
Nevitt MCEttinger BBlack DMStone KJamal SAEnsrud Ket al . The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:793-800. [PMID: 9599190]
39.
Yamato MNishimura GKuramochi ESaiki NFujioka M. MR appearance at different ages of osteoporotic compression fractures of the vertebrae. Radiat Med. 1998;16:329-34. [PMID: 9862153]
40.
Marc VDromer CLe Guennec PManelfe CFournie B. Magnetic resonance imaging and axial involvement in spondylarthropathies. Delineation of the spinal entheses. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1997;64:465-73. [PMID: 9338928]
41.
Thornbury JRFryback DGTurski PAJavid MJMcDonald JVBeinlich BRet al . Disk-caused nerve compression in patients with acute low-back pain: diagnosis with MR, CT myelography, and plain CT. Radiology. 1993;186:731-8. [PMID: 8267688]
42.
Jackson RPCain JE JrJacobs RRCooper BRMcManus GE. The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: II. A comparison of computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT-myelography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 1989;14:1362-7. [PMID: 2694389]
43.
Hellström MJacobsson BSwärd LPeterson L. Radiologic abnormalities of the thoraco-lumbar spine in athletes. Acta Radiol. 1990;31:127-32. [PMID: 2372454]
44.
Hitselberger WEWitten RM. Abnormal myelograms in asymptomatic patients. J Neurosurg. 1968;28:204-6. [PMID: 5643913]
45.
Wiesel SWTsourmas NFeffer HLCitrin CMPatronas N. A study of computer-assisted tomography. I. The incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients. Spine. 1984;9:549-51. [PMID: 6495024]
46.
Weinreb JCWolbarsht LBCohen JMBrown CEMaravilla KR. Prevalence of lumbosacral intervertebral disk abnormalities on MR images in pregnant and asymptomatic nonpregnant women. Radiology. 1989;170:125-8. [PMID: 2521192]
47.
Burns JWLoecker THFischer JR JrBauer DH. Prevalence and significance of spinal disc abnormalities in an asymptomatic acceleration subject panel. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996;67:849-53. [PMID: 9025800]
48.
Stadnik TWLee RRCoen HLNeirynck ECBuisseret TSOsteaux MJ. Annular tears and disk herniation: prevalence and contrast enhancement on MR images in the absence of low back pain or sciatica. Radiology. 1998;206:49-55. [PMID: 9423651]
49.
Weishaupt DZanetti MHodler JBoos N. MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology. 1998;209:661-6. [PMID: 9844656]
50.
Carragee EJParagioudakis SJKhurana S. 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine. 2000;25:2987-92. [PMID: 11145809]
51.
Kent DLHaynor DRLarson EBDeyo RA. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:1135-44. [PMID: 1533084]
52.
Porter RWBewley B. A ten-year prospective study of vertebral canal size as a predictor of back pain. Spine. 1994;19:173-5. [PMID: 8153826]
53.
Wilmink JT. CT morphology of intrathecal lumbosacral nerve-root compression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1989;10:233-48. [PMID: 2494846]
54.
Schwarzer ACWang SCO'Driscoll DHarrington TBogduk NLaurent R. The ability of computed tomography to identify a painful zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1995;20:907-12. [PMID: 7644955]
55.
Pui MHHusen YA. Value of magnetic resonance myelography in the diagnosis of disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Australas Radiol. 2000;44:281-4. [PMID: 10974720]
56.
Kikkawa ISugimoto HSaita KOokami HNakama SHoshino Y. The role of Gd-enhanced three-dimensional MRI fast low-angle shot (FLASH) in the evaluation of symptomatic lumbosacral nerve roots. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:101-9. [PMID: 11484093]
57.
Lane JIKoeller KKAtkinson JL. Enhanced lumbar nerve roots in the spine without prior surgery: radiculitis or radicular veins? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1317-25. [PMID: 7976944]
58.
Crisi GCarpeggiani PTrevisan C. Gadolinium-enhanced nerve roots in lumbar disk herniation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14:1379-92. [PMID: 8279335]
59.
Algra PRBloem JLTissing HFalke THArndt JWVerboom LJ. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Radiographics. 1991;11:219-32. [PMID: 2028061]
60.
Avrahami ETadmor RDally OHadar H. Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989;13:598-602. [PMID: 2745777]
61.
Carroll KWFeller JFTirman PF. Useful internal standards for distinguishing infiltrative marrow pathology from hematopoietic marrow at MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:394-8. [PMID: 9090597]
62.
Carmody RFYang PJSeeley GWSeeger JFUnger ECJohnson JE. Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography. Radiology. 1989;173:225-9. [PMID: 2675185]
63.
Kosuda SKaji TYokoyama HYokokawa TKatayama MIriye Tet al . Does bone SPECT actually have lower sensitivity for detecting vertebral metastasis than MRI? J Nucl Med. 1996;37:975-8. [PMID: 8683325]
64.
Gillams ARChaddha BCarter AP. MR appearances of the temporal evolution and resolution of infectious spondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:903-7. [PMID: 8610571]
65.
Smith ASWeinstein MAMizushima ACoughlin BHayden SPLakin MMet al . MR imaging characteristics of tuberculous spondylitis vs vertebral osteomyelitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:399-405. [PMID: 2750627]
66.
Brant-Zawadzki MN, Jensen MC, Obuchowski N, Ross JS, Modic MT. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in interpretation of lumbar disc abnormalities. A comparison of two nomenclatures. Spine. 1995; 20:1257-63; discussion 1264. [ 7660234]
67.
Janssen MEBertrand SLJoe CLevine MI. Lumbar herniated disk disease: comparison of MRI, myelography, and post-myelographic CT scan with surgical findings. Orthopedics. 1994;17:121-7. [PMID: 8190676]
68.
Beattie PFMeyers SPStratford PMillard RWHollenberg GM. Associations between patient report of symptoms and anatomic impairment visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 2000;25:819-28. [PMID: 10751293]
69.
Vroomen PCde Krom MCWilmink JT. Pathoanatomy of clinical findings in patients with sciatica: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosurg. 2000;92:135-41. [PMID: 10763682]
70.
Rankine JJFortune DGHutchinson CEHughes DGMain CJ. Pain drawings in the assessment of nerve root compression: a comparative study with lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 1998;23:1668-76. [PMID: 9704374]
71.
Aprill CBogduk N. High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:361-9. [PMID: 1535257]
72.
Lam KSCarlin DMulholland RC. Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:36-41. [PMID: 10766075]
73.
Sandhu HSSanchez-Caso LPParvataneni HKCammisa FP JrGirardi FPGhelman B. Association between findings of provocative discography and vertebral endplate signal changes as seen on MRI. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:438-43. [PMID: 11052355]
74.
Rankine JJ, Gill KP, Hutchinson CE, Ross ER, Williamson JB. The clinical significance of the high-intensity zone on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 1999; 24:1913-9; discussion 1920. [ 10515016]
75.
Subramanian GMcAfee JG. A new complex of 99mTc for skeletal imaging. Radiology. 1971;99:192-6. [PMID: 5548678]
76.
Bellah RDSummerville DATreves STMicheli LJ. Low-back pain in adolescent athletes: detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis with SPECT. Radiology. 1991;180:509-12. [PMID: 1829845]
77.
Collier BDJohnson RPCarrera GFMeyer GASchwab JPFlatley TJet al . Painful spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis studied by radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography. Radiology. 1985;154:207-11. [PMID: 3155479]
78.
Peh WCHo WYLuk KD. Applications of bone scintigraphy in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Imaging. 1997;21:54-62. [PMID: 9117933]
79.
Jacobsson HLarsson SAVestersköld LLindvall N. The application of single photon emission computed tomography to the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis of the spine. Br J Radiol. 1984;57:133-40. [PMID: 6229308]
80.
Swanson DBlecker IGahbauer HCaride VJ. Diagnosis of discitis by SPECT technetium-99m MDP scintigram. A case report. Clin Nucl Med. 1987;12:210-1. [PMID: 3493875]
81.
Han LJAu-Yong TKTong WCChu KSSzeto LTWong CP. Comparison of bone single-photon emission tomography and planar imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases in patients with back pain. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:635-8. [PMID: 9618579]
82.
McDougall IRKriss JP. Screening for bone metastases. Are only scans necessary? JAMA. 1975;231:46-50. [PMID: 1243567]
83.
Corcoran RJThrall JHKyle RWKaminski RJJohnson MC. Solitary abnormalities in bone scans of patients with extraosseous malignancies. Radiology. 1976;121:663-7. [PMID: 981663]
84.
Savelli GChiti AGrasselli GMaccauro MRodari MBombardieri E. The role of bone SPET study in diagnosis of single vertebral metastases. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:1115-20. [PMID: 10810405]
85.
Petrén-Mallmin M. Clinical and experimental imaging of breast cancer metastases in the spine. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1994;391:1-23. [PMID: 8172006]
86.
McNeil BJ. Rationale for the use of bone scans in selected metastatic and primary bone tumors. Semin Nucl Med. 1978;8:336-45. [PMID: 112684]
87.
Jacobson AF. Musculoskeletal pain as an indicator of occult malignancy. Yield of bone scintigraphy. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:105-9. [PMID: 8996047]
88.
Even-Sapir EMartin RHBarnes DCPringle CRIles SEMitchell MJ. Role of SPECT in differentiating malignant from benign lesions in the lower thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Radiology. 1993;187:193-8. [PMID: 8451412]
89.
Hanly JGBarnes DCMitchell MJMacMillan LDocherty P. Single photon emission computed tomography in the diagnosis of inflammatory spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:2062-8. [PMID: 8014934]
90.
Joines JDMcNutt RACarey TSDeyo RARouhani R. Finding cancer in primary care outpatients with low back pain: a comparison of diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:14-23. [PMID: 11251746]
91.
Liang MKomaroff AL. Roentgenograms in primary care patients with acute low back pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:1108-12. [PMID: 6212032]
92.
Albeck MJDanneskiold-Samsoe B. Patient attitudes to myelography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging when examined for suspected lumbar disc herniation. Acta Neurochir Wien. 1995;133:3-6. [PMID: 8561032]
93.
Albeck MJHilden JKjaer LHoltås SPraestholm JHenriksen Oet al . A controlled comparison of myelography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in clinically suspected lumbar disc herniation. Spine. 1995;20:443-8. [PMID: 7747227]

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 137Number 71 October 2002
Pages: 586 - 597

History

Published online: 1 October 2002
Published in issue: 1 October 2002

Keywords

Authors

Affiliations

Jeffrey G. Jarvik, MD, MPH
From University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Richard A. Deyo, MD, MPH
From University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Grant Support: In part by grants HS-08194 and HS-094990 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, a Veterans Affairs ERIC grant, and grant 1 P60 AR48093 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Corresponding Author: Jeffrey G. Jarvik, MD, MPH, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Box 357115, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195; e-mail, [email protected].
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Jarvik, MD, MPH, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Box 357115, 1959 NE Pacific Sreet, Seattle, WA 98195.
Dr. Deyo: Center for Cost and Outcomes Research, 146 North Canal Street, #300, Seattle, WA 98103.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format





Download article citation data for:
Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Richard A. Deyo. Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging. Ann Intern Med.2002;137:586-597. [Epub 1 October 2002]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00010

View More

Get Access

Login Options:
Purchase

You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.

Create your Free Account

You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Related in ACP Journals

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media