Articles15 May 2001
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information



    Social status is an important predictor of poor health. Most studies of this issue have focused on the lower echelons of society.


    To determine whether the increase in status from winning an academy award is associated with long-term mortality among actors and actresses.


    Retrospective cohort analysis.


    Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.


    All actors and actresses ever nominated for an academy award in a leading or a supporting role were identified (n = 762). For each, another cast member of the same sex who was in the same film and was born in the same era was identified (n = 887).


    Life expectancy and all-cause mortality rates.


    All 1649 performers were analyzed; the median duration of follow-up time from birth was 66 years, and 772 deaths occurred (primarily from ischemic heart disease and malignant disease). Life expectancy was 3.9 years longer for Academy Award winners than for other, less recognized performers (79.7 vs. 75.8 years; P = 0.003). This difference was equal to a 28% relative reduction in death rates (95% CI, 10% to 42%). Adjustment for birth year, sex, and ethnicity yielded similar results, as did adjustments for birth country, possible name change, age at release of first film, and total films in career. Additional wins were associated with a 22% relative reduction in death rates (CI, 5% to 35%), whereas additional films and additional nominations were not associated with a significant reduction in death rates.


    The association of high status with increased longevity that prevails in the public also extends to celebrities, contributes to a large survival advantage, and is partially explained by factors related to success.


    • 1. Marmot MGShipley MJRose GInequalities in death—specific explanations of a general pattern? Lancet1984;1:1003-6. [PMID: 6143919] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Smith GDCarroll DRankin SRowan DSocioeconomic differentials in mortality: evidence from Glasgow graveyards. BMJ1992;305:1554-7. [PMID: 1286385] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR, eds. Why Are Some People Healthy and Others Not? The Determinants of Health of Populations. New York: A. De Gruyter; 1994:3-26. Google Scholar
    • 4. Syme SLBalfour JLExplaining inequalities in coronary heart disease. Lancet1997;350:231-2. [PMID: 9242795] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States 1997. 117th edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1997:287. Publication no. 003-024-08825-8. Google Scholar
    • 6. ABC's Oscar ratings higher than last year. The Associated Press. 28 March 2000. Google Scholar
    • 7. Walker J, ed. Halliwell's Filmgoer's and Video Viewer's Companion. 12th ed. Toronto: Harper Perennial; 1997. Google Scholar
    • 8. Truitt EMWho Was Who on Screen. 3rd ed. New York: RR Bowker; 1984. Google Scholar
    • 9. Katz EThe Film Encyclopedia. New York: Thomas Crowell; 1979. Google Scholar
    • 10. Fuller GLloyd AThe Illustrated Who's Who of the Cinema. London: Orbis; 1983. Google Scholar
    • 11. Pelikan SMoskowitz MEffects of lead time, length bias, and false-negative assurance on screening for breast cancer. Cancer1993;71:1998-2005. [PMID: 8443751] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Tunnell RDMillar BWSmith GBThe effect of lead time bias on severity of illness scoring, mortality prediction and standardised mortality ratio in intensive care—a pilot study. Anaesthesia1998;53:1045-53. [PMID: 10023272] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Taylor RMeasurement of population mortality.. In: Kerr C, Taylor R, Heard G, eds. Handbook of Public Health Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998:57-9. Google Scholar
    • 14. Gail MHDoes cardiac transplantation prolong life? A reassessment. Ann Intern Med1972;76:815-7. [PMID: 4554414] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Cox DROakes DAnalysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman and Hall; 1984:112-41. Google Scholar
    • 16. Glesby MJHoover DRSurvivor treatment selection bias in observational studies: examples from the AIDS literature. Ann Intern Med1996;124:999-1005. [PMID: 8624068] LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Katz MHMultivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Pr; 1999:173-5. Google Scholar
    • 18. Fisher LDLin DYTime-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Annu Rev Public Health1999;20:145-57. [PMID: 10352854] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Lantz PMHouse JSLepkowski JMWilliams DRMero RPChen JSocioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA1998;279:1703-8. [PMID: 9624022] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Medvec VHMadey SFGilovich TWhen less is more: counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. J Pers Soc Psychol1995;69:603-10. [PMID: 7473022] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States 1996: The National Data Book. 116th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1996:88. Publication no. 003-024-08809-6. Google Scholar
    • 22. Olshansky SJCarnes BACassel CIn search of Methuselah: estimating the upper limits to human longevity. Science1990;250:634-40. [PMID: 2237414] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Detsky ASRedelmeier DAMeasuring health outcomes—putting gains into perspective [Editorial]. N Engl J Med1998;339:402-4. [PMID: 9691111] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar