Faculty Perceptions of Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine
Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 132, Number 11
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.
Abstract
Background:
Gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment are common in medical practice and may be even more prevalent in academic medicine.
Objective:
To examine the prevalence of gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment among medical school faculty and the associations of gender-based discrimination with number of publications, career satisfaction, and perceptions of career advancement.
Design:
A self-administered mailed questionnaire of U.S. medical school faculty that covered a broad range of topics relating to academic life.
Setting:
24 randomly selected medical schools in the contiguous United States.
Participants:
A random sample of 3332 full-time faculty, stratified by specialty, graduation cohort, and sex.
Measurements:
Prevalence of self-reported experiences of discrimination and harassment, number of peer-reviewed publications, career satisfaction, and perception of career advancement.
Results:
Female faculty were more than 2.5 times more likely than male faculty to perceive gender-based discrimination in the academic environment (P < 0.001). Among women, rates of reported discrimination ranged from 47% for the youngest faculty to 70% for the oldest faculty. Women who reported experiencing negative gender bias had similar productivity but lower career satisfaction scores than did other women (P < 0.001). About half of female faculty but few male faculty experienced some form of sexual harassment. These experiences were similarly prevalent across the institutions in the sample and in all regions of the United States. Female faculty who reported being sexually harassed perceived gender-specific bias in the academic environment more often than did other women (80% compared with 61%) and more often reported experiencing gender bias in professional advancement (72% compared with 47%). Publications, career satisfaction, and professional confidence were not affected by sexual harassment, and self-assessed career advancement was only marginally lower for female faculty who had experienced sexual harassment (P = 0.06).
Conclusion:
Despite substantial increases in the number of female faculty, reports of gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment remain common.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Association of American Medical Colleges. U.S. Medical School Faculty: Faculty Roster System. Washington, DC: Assoc of American Medical Colleges; 1997.
2.
Conley F. And, ladies of the club [Editorial]. JAMA. 1992;267:740-1.
3.
Conley F. Gender stereotyping and the medical profession: why women scientists must challenge the “old boy network.”. Journal of College Science Teaching. 1994;24:17-21.
4.
Conley F. Toward a more perfect world—eliminating sexual discrimination in academic medicine [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:351-2.
5.
Frank E, Brogan D, Schiffman M. Prevalence and correlates of harassment among U.S. women physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:352-8.
6.
Schiffman M, Frank E. Harassment of women physicians. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1995;50:207-11.
7.
Lenhart S, Evans C. Sexual harassment and gender discrimination: a primer for women physicians. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1991;46:77-80, 81-2.
8.
Till F. Sexual Harassment: A Report on the Sexual Harassment of Students. Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs; 1980.
9.
Fitzgerald LF, Shullman SL, Bailey N, Richards M, Swecker J, Gold Y, et al . The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1988;32:152-75.
10.
McCann ND, McGinn TA. Harassed: 100 women define inappropriate behavior in the workplace. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin; 1992.
11.
. A professional disgrace. Lancet. 1993;342:627-8.
12.
Baldwin DC Jr, Daugherty SR, Eckenfels EJ. Student perceptions of mistreatment and harassment during medical school: a survey of ten United States schools. West J Med. 1991;155:140-5.
13.
Wolf TM, Randall HM, von Almen K, Tynes LL. Perceived mistreatment and attitude change by graduation of medical students: a retrospective study. Med Educ. 1991;25:182-90.
14.
Richman JA, Flaherty JA, Rospenda KM, Christensen ML. Mental health consequences and correlates of reported medical school abuse. JAMA. 1992;267:692-4.
15.
Lubitz RM, Nguyen DD. Medical students abuse during third-year clerkships. JAMA. 1996;275:414-6.
16.
Dresler CM, Padgett DL, MacKinnon SE, Patterson GA. Experience of women in cardiothoracic surgery. A gender comparison. Arch Surg. 1996;131:1128-34.
17.
Capek L, Edwards DE, MacKinnon SE. Plastic surgeons: a gender comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:289-99.
18.
McGlynn EA. Physician Job Satisfaction: Its Measurement and Use as an Indicator of System Performance. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 1989.
19.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Discrimination because of sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended: adoption of interim interpretive guidelines. Fed Regist. 1980; 45:25024-5.
20.
LaFontaine E, Tredeau L. The frequency, sources and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations. Sex Roles. 1986;15:433-42.
21.
Maypole PE, Skaine R. Sexual harassment of blue-collar workers. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. 1982;9:682-95.
22.
McGoldrick KE. Sexual harassment: unsettled topography. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1992;47:4.
23.
Sandler B. Sexual harassment: a new issue for institutions. Journal of the National Association of Deans Administrative Counsel. 1990;52:5-10.
24.
Lillemoe KD, Ahrendt GM, Yeo CJ, Herlong HF, Cameron JL. Surgery—still an “old boys' club?”. Surgery. 1994;116:255-9.
25.
Riger S. Gender dilemmas in sexual harassment policies and procedures. American Psychologist. 1991;46:497-505.
26.
Komaromy M, Bindman AB, Haber RJ, Sande MA. Sexual harassment in medical training. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:322-6.
27.
Fitzgerald L, Ormerod A. Breaking silence: the sexual harassment of women in academia and the workplace. In: Denmark F, Paludi M, eds. Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories. Westport, CT: Greenwood Pr; 1993:553-81.
28.
Hostler SL, Gressard RP. Perceptions of the gender fairness of the medical education environment. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1993;48:51-4.
29.
Satterfield AT, Muehlenhard CL. Shaken confidence: the effects of an authority figure's flirtatiousness on women's and men's self-rated creativity. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1997;21:395-416.
30.
Cole JR, Singer B. A theory of limited differences: explaining the productivity puzzle in science. In: Zuckerman H, Cole JR, Bruer RT, eds. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: WW Norton; 1991.
31.
Padgitt SC, Padgitt JS. Cognitive structure of sexual harassment: implications for university policy. Journal of College Student Personnel. 1986;27:34-9.
32.
Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Pr; 1982.
33.
Gordon GH, Labby D, Levinson W. Sex and the teacher–learner relationship in medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:443-8.
34.
Phillips SP, Schneider MS. Sexual harassment of female doctors by patients. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1936-9.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 132 • Number 11 • 6 June 2000
Pages: 889 - 896
History
Published in issue: 6 June 2000
Published online: 15 August 2000
Keywords
Copyright
© 2000 American College of Physicians.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Download article citation data for:
Faculty Perceptions of Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine. Ann Intern Med.2000;132:889-896. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00007
Faculty Perceptions of Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine. Ann Intern Med.2000;132:889-896. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00007
View More
Login Options:
Purchase
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
Access to EPUBs and PDFs for FREE Annals content requires users to be registered and logged in. A subscription is not required. You can create a free account below or from the following link. You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals. If you are accessing the Free Annals content via your institution's access, registration is not required.
Create your Free Account
You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.
Comments
0 Comments