Mosquitoes and Mosquito Repellents: A Clinician's Guide

References

• 1. Taubes G. A mosquito bites back. The New York Times Magazine. 1977; 24 Aug:40-6. Google Scholar
• 2. Shell ER. Resurgence of a deadly disease. The Atlantic Monthly. 1997; Aug:45-60. Google Scholar
• 3. Clements AN. The Physiology of Mosquitoes. Oxford: Pergamon Pr; 1963. Google Scholar
• 4. Miike L. Do insects transmit AIDS? Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment Health Program, U.S. Congress; 1987. Google Scholar
• 5. McHugh CP. Arthropods: vectors of disease agents. Laboratory Medicine. 1994; 25:429-37. Google Scholar
• 6. Maibach HI, Skinner WA, Strauss WG, Khan AA. Factors that attract and repel mosquitoes in human skin. JAMA. 1966; 196:263-6. Google Scholar
• 7. Curtis CF. Fact and fiction in mosquito attraction and repulsion. Parasitology Today. 1986; 2:316-8. Google Scholar
• 8. Keystone JS. Of bites and body odour. Lancet. 1996; 347:1423. Google Scholar
• 9. Bock GR, Cardew G, eds. Olfaction in Mosquito-Host Interactions. New York: J Wiley; 1996. Google Scholar
• 10. Bowen MF. The sensory physiology of host-seeking behavior in mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol. 1991; 36:139-58. Google Scholar
• 11. Davis EE, Bowen MF. Sensory physiological basis for attraction in mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1994; 10(2 Pt 2):316-25. Google Scholar
• 12. Gjullin CM. Effect of clothing color on the rate of attack of Aedes mosquitoes. J Econ Entomol. 1947; 40:326-7. Google Scholar
• 13. Gillies MT. The role of carbon dioxide in host-finding by mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 1980; 70:525-32. Google Scholar
• 14. Gillies MT, Wilkes TJ. The range of attraction of animal baits and carbon dioxide for mosquitoes. Studies in a freshwater area of West Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 1972; 61:389-404. Google Scholar
• 15. Snow WF. The effect of a reduction in expired carbon dioxide on the attractiveness of human subjects to mosquitoes. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 1970; 60:43-8. Google Scholar
• 16. Davis EE, Sokolove PG. Lactic acid-sensitive receptors on the antennae of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. J Comp Physiol. 1976; 105:43-54. Google Scholar
• 17. Khan AA. Mosquito attractants and repellents. In: Shorey HH, McKelvey JJ, eds. Chemical Control of Insect Behavior. New York: J Wiley; 1977:305-25. Google Scholar
• 18. de Jong R, Knols BG. Selection of biting sites by mosquitoes. In: Bock GR, Cardew G, eds. Olfaction in Mosquito-Host Interactions. New York: J Wiley; 1996:89-108. Google Scholar
• 19. Kline DL, Schreck CE. Personal protection afforded by controlled-release topical repellents and permethrin-treated clothing against natural populations of Aedes taeniorhynchus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1989; 5:77-80. Google Scholar
• 20. Schreck CE, Kline DL, Carlson DA. Mosquito attraction to substances from the skin of different humans. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1990; 6:406-10. Google Scholar
• 21. Knols BG, de Jong R, Takken W. Trapping system for testing olfactory responses of the malarial mosquito Anopheles gambiae in a wind tunnel. Med Vet Entomol. 1994; 8:386-8. Google Scholar
• 22. Geier M, Sass H, Boeckh J. A search for components in human body odour that attract females of Aedes aegypti. In: Bock GR, Cardew G, eds. Olfaction in Mosquito-Host Interactions. New York: J Wiley; 1996:132-48. Google Scholar
• 23. Foster WA, Hancock RG. Nectar-related olfactory and visual attractants for mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1994; 10 (2 Pt 2):288-96. Google Scholar
• 24. Curtis CF, Lines JD, Ijumba J, Callaghan A, Hill N, Karimzad MA. The relative efficacy of repellents against mosquito vectors of disease. Med Vet Entomol. 1987; 1:109-19. Google Scholar
• 25. Muirhead-Thomson RC. The distribution of anopheline mosquito bites among different age groups. Br Med J. 1951; 1:1114-7. Google Scholar
• 26. Gilbert IH, Gouck HK, Smith N. Attractiveness of men and women to Aedes aegypti and relative protection time obtained with DEET. Florida Entomologist. 1966; 49:53-66. Google Scholar
• 27. Port GR, Boreham PFL. The relationship of host size to feeding by mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex (Diptera: Culicidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research. 1980; 70:133-44. Google Scholar
• 28. Khan AA, Maibach HI, Strauss WG, Fenley WR. Vitamin B₁ is not a systemic mosquito repellent in man. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc. 1969; 55:99-102. Google Scholar
• 29. Strauss WG, Maibach HI, Khan AA. Drugs and disease as mosquito repellents in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1968; 17:461-4. Google Scholar
• 30. Davis EE. Insect repellents: concepts of their mode of action relative to potential sensory mechanisms in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1985; 22:237-43. Google Scholar
• 31. Wright RH. Why mosquito repellents repel. Sci Am. 1975; 233:104-11. Google Scholar
• 32. Rutledge LC, Collister DM, Meixsell VE, Eisenberg GH. Comparative sensitivity of representative mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to repellents. J Med Entomol. 1983; 20:506-10. Google Scholar
• 33. Schreck CE. Protection from blood-feeding arthropods. In: Auerbach PS, ed. Wilderness Medicine: Management of Wilderness and Environmental Emergencies. 3d ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995:813-30. Google Scholar
• 34. Maibach HI, Akers WA, Johnson HL, Khan AA, Skinner WA. Insects. Topical insect repellents. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974; 16(5 Part 2):970-3. Google Scholar
• 35. Maibach HI, Khan AA, Akers WA. Use of insect repellents for maximum efficacy. Arch Dermatol. 1974; 109:32-5. Google Scholar
• 36. Gabel ML, Spencer TS, Akers WA. Evaporation rates and protection times of mosquito repellents. Mosquito News. 1976; 36:141-6. Google Scholar
• 37. Khan AA, Maibach HI, Skidmore DL. A study of insect repellents: effect of temperature on protection time. J Econ Entomol. 1972; 66:437-8. Google Scholar
• 38. Quarles W. Lighted and baited mosquito traps. Common Sense Pest Control. 1996; 12:5-11. Google Scholar
• 39. Jacobson M, ed. Glossary of plant-derived insect deterrents. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Pr; 1990. Google Scholar
• 40. King WV. Chemicals evaluated as insecticides and repellents at Orlando, Fla. USDA Agricultural Handbook. 1954; 69:1-397. Google Scholar
• 41. Materials evaluated as insecticides, repellents, and chemosterilants at Orlando and Gainesville, Fla., 1952-1964. USDA Agricultural Handbook. 1967; 340:1-424. Google Scholar
• 42. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. Special Pesticide Review Division. N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) Pesticide Registration Standard (EPA-540/RS-81-004). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1980. (PB81-207722) Google Scholar
• 43. Rutledge LC, Wirtz RA, Buescher MD, Mehr ZA. Mathematical models of the effectiveness and persistence of mosquito repellents. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985; 1:56-61. Google Scholar
• 44. Buescher MD, Rutledge LC, Wirtz RA. Tests of commercial repellents on human skin against Aedes aegypti. Mosquito News. 1982; 42:428-33. Google Scholar
• 45. Buescher MD, Rutledge LC, Wirtz RA, Nelson JH. The dose-persistence relationship of deet against Aedes aegypti. Mosquito News. 1983; 43:364-6. Google Scholar
• 46. Schreck CE, McGovern TP. Repellents and other personal protection strategies against Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1989; 5:247-50. Google Scholar
• 47. Mehr ZA, Rutledge LC, Morales EL, Meixsell VE, Korte DW. Laboratory evaluation of controlled-release insect repellent formulations. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985; 1:143-7. Google Scholar
• 48. Gupta RK, Rutledge LC. Laboratory evaluation of controlled-release repellent formulations on human volunteers under three climatic regimens. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1989; 5:52-5. Google Scholar
• 49. Schreck CE, Kline DL. Repellency of two controlled-release formulations of deet against Anopheles quadrimaculatus and Aedes taeniorhynchus mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1989; 5:91-4. Google Scholar
• 50. Annis B. Comparison of the effectiveness of two formulations of deet against Anopheles flavirostris. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1990; 6:430-2. Google Scholar
• 51. Gupta RK, Rutledge LC. Controlled release repellent formulations on human volunteers under three climatic regimens. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991; 7:490-3. Google Scholar
• 52. Domb AJ, Marlinsky A, Maniar M, Teomim L. Insect repellent formulations of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (deet) in a liposphere system: efficacy and skin uptake. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1995; 11:29-34. Google Scholar
• 53. Garrettson LK. Commentary-DEET: caution for children still needed. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997; 35:443-5. Google Scholar
• 54. Shelov SP, ed. Caring for Your Baby and Young Child: Birth to Age 5. New York: Bantam Books; 1991:639. Google Scholar
• 55. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs. Using Insect Repellents Safely (EPA-735/F-93-052R). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1996. Google Scholar
• 56. Rutledge LC. Some corrections to the record on insect repellents and attractants. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1988; 4:414-25. Google Scholar
• 57. Montemarano AD, Gupta RK, Burge JR, Klein K. Insect repellents and the efficacy of sunscreens. Lancet. 1997; 349:1670-1. Google Scholar
• 58. Selim S, Hartnagel RE Jr, Osimitz TG, Gabriel KL, Schoenig GP. Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide following dermal application to human volunteers. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1995; 25:95-100. Google Scholar
• 59. Robbins PJ, Cherniack MG. Review of the biodistribution and toxicity of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). J Toxicol Environ Health. 1986; 18:503-25. Google Scholar
• 60. Qiu H, Jun HW, Tao J. Pharmacokinetics of insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide in beagle dogs following intravenous and topical routes of administration. J Pharm Sci. 1997; 86:514-6. Google Scholar
• 61. Schoenig GP, Hartnagel RE Jr, Osimitz TG, Llanso S. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide in the rat. Drug Metab Dispos. 1996; 24:156-63. Google Scholar
• 62. Reifenrath W, Hawkins G, Kurtz M, Bernardo E, Dahlberg E, Jesse R. Controlled Release Personal Use Arthropod Repellent Formulation: In Vitro Evaluation of Evaporation/Penetration Characteristics, Water Wash Resistance, and Interaction with CW Agent Analogs. San Francisco: Presidio of San Francisco; Division of Cutaneous Hazards, Letterman Institute of Research; 1986. Google Scholar
• 63. Osimitz TG, Grothaus RH. The present safety assessment of DEET. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1995; 11(2 Pt 2):274-8. Google Scholar
• 64. Completed Studies for the DEET Toxicology Data Development Program. Washington, DC: The DEET Joint Venture Group, Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Association; 1996. Google Scholar
• 65. Snyder JW, Poe RO, Stubbins JF, Garrettson LK. Acute manic psychosis following the dermal application of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in an adult. Clin Toxicol. 1986; 24:429-39. Google Scholar
• 66. Heick HM, Peterson RG, Dalpe-Scott M, Qureshi IA. Insect repellent, N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide, effect on ammonia metabolism. Pediatrics. 1988; 82:373-6. Google Scholar
• 67. Heick HM, Shipman RT, Norman MG, James W. Reye-like syndrome associated with use of insect repellent in a presumed heterozygote for ornithine carbamoyl transferase deficiency. J Pediatr. 1980; 97:471-3. Google Scholar
• 68. de Garbino JP, Laborde A. Toxicity of an insect repellent: N-N-diethyltoluamide. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1983; 25:422-3. Google Scholar
• 69. Zadikoff CM. Toxic encephalopathy associated with use of insect repellant. J Pediatr. 1979; 95:140-2. Google Scholar
• 70. Osimitz TG, Murphy JV. Neurological effects associated with use of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997; 35:435-41. Google Scholar
• 71. Lipscomb JW, Kramer JE, Leikin JB. Seizure following brief exposure to the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide. Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21:315-7. Google Scholar
• 72. Gryboski J, Weinstein D, Ordway NK. Toxic encephalopathy apparently related to the use of an insect repellent. N Engl J Med. 1961; 264:289-91. Google Scholar
• 73. Roland EH, Jan JE, Rigg JM. Toxic encephalopathy in a child after brief exposure to insect repellents. Can Med Assoc J. 1985; 132:155-6. Google Scholar
• 74. Seizures temporally associated with the use of DEET insect repellent-New York and Connecticut. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1989; 38:678-80. Google Scholar
• 75. Edwards DL, Johnson CE. Insect-repellent-induced toxic encephalopathy in a child. Clin Pharm. 1987; 6:496-8. Google Scholar
• 76. Veltri JC, Osimitz TG, Bradford DC, Page BC. Retrospective analysis of calls to poison control centers resulting from exposure to the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) from 1985-1989. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1994; 32:1-16. Google Scholar
• 77. Tenenbein M. Severe toxic reactions and death following the ingestion of diethyltoluamide-containing insect repellents. JAMA. 1987; 258:1509-11. Google Scholar
• 78. Leach GJ, Russell RD, Houpt JT. Some cardiovascular effects of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). J Toxicol Environ Health. 1988; 25:217-25. Google Scholar
• 79. Clem JR, Havemann DF, Raebel MA. Insect repellent (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) cardiovascular toxicity in an adult. Ann Pharmacother. 1993; 27:289-93. Google Scholar
• 80. Miller JD. Anaphylaxis associated with insect repellent. N Engl J Med. 1982; 307:1341-2. Google Scholar
• 81. von Mayenburg J, Rakoski J. Contact urticaria to diethyltoluamide. Contact Dermatitis. 1994; 9:171. Google Scholar
• 82. Maibach HI, Johnson HL. Contact urticaria syndrome. Contact urticaria to diethyltoluamide (immediate-type sensitivity). Arch Dermatol. 1975; 111:726-30. Google Scholar
• 83. Wantke F, Focke M, Hemmer W, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Generalized urticaria induced by a diethyltoluamide-containing insect repellent in a child. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 35:186-7. Google Scholar
• 84. Amichai B, Lazarov A, Halevy S. Contact dermatitis from diethyltoluamide. Contact Dermatitis. 1994; 30:188. Google Scholar
• 85. Reuveni H, Yagupsky P. Diethyltoluamide-containing insect repellent: adverse effects in worldwide use. Arch Dermatol. 1982; 118:582-3. Google Scholar
• 86. Lamberg SI, Mulrennan JA Jr. Bullous reaction to diethyl toluamide (DEET). Resembling a blistering insect eruption. Arch Dermatol. 1969; 100:582-6. Google Scholar
• 87. Sukumar K, Perich MJ, Boobar LR. Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991; 7:210-37. Google Scholar
• 88. Quarles W. Botanical mosquito repellents. Common Sense Pest Control. 1996; 12:12-9. Google Scholar
• 89. Grainger J, Moore C. Natural Insect Repellents for Pets, People and Plants. Austin: The Herb Bar; 1991. Google Scholar
• 90. Brown M, Hebert AA. Insect repellents: an overview. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997; 36(2 Pt 1):243-9. Google Scholar
• 91. Duke J. USDA Agricultural Research Service Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases. (http://www.ars-grin.gov/ngrlsb/) Google Scholar
• 92. Spero NC. Repellent Testing against Adult Mosquitoes in the Laboratory. Baltimore: Insect Control and Research; 1993. Sponsored by Quantum, Inc. Google Scholar
• 93. Surgeoner GA. Efficacy of Buzz Away Oil against spring Aedes spp. mosquitoes. Guelph, Ontario: Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph; 1995. Sponsored by Quantum, Inc. Google Scholar
• 94. Lindsay RL, Surgeoner GA, Heal JD, Gallivan GJ. Evaluation of the efficacy of 3% citronella candles and 5% citronella incense for protection against field populations of Aedes mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1996; 12(2 Pt 1):293-4. Google Scholar
• 95. Matsuda BM, Surgeoner GA, Heal JD, Tucker AO, Maciarello MJ. Essential oil analysis and field evaluation of the citrosa plant “Pelargonium citrosum” as a repellent against populations of Aedes mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1996; 12:69-74. Google Scholar
• 96. Cilek JE, Schreiber ET. Failure of the “mosquito plant”, Pelargonium x citrosum ‘van Leenii’, to repel adult Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus in Florida. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1994; 10:473-6. Google Scholar
• 97. Finally, a safer insect repellent. University of California at Berkeley Wellness Letter. 1997; 13:2. Google Scholar
• 98. Lindsay RL, Heal JD, Surgeoner GA. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of Bite Blocker, Off! Skintastic, and Avon Skin-So-Soft to protect against Aedes species mosquitoes in Ontario. Guelph, Ontario: Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph; 1996. Sponsored by Chemfree Environment, Inc. Google Scholar
• 99. Lindsay RL, Heal JD, Surgeoner GA. Evaluation of Bite Blocker as a repellent against spring Aedes spp. mosquitoes. Guelph, Ontario: Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph; 1996. Sponsored by Chemfree Environment, Inc. Google Scholar
• 100. Casida JE, Quistad GB. Pyrethrum flowers: production, chemistry, toxicology and uses. Oxford: Oxford Univ Pr; 1995. Google Scholar
• 101. Insect repellents. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1989; 31:45-7. Google Scholar
• 102. Schreck CE. Permethrin and dimethyl phthalate as tent fabric treatments against Aedes aegypti. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991; 7:533-5. Google Scholar
• 103. Lines JD, Myamba J, Curtis CF. Experimental hut trials of permethrin-impregnated mosquito nets and eave curtains against malaria vectors in Tanzania. Med Vet Entomol. 1987; 1:37-51. Google Scholar
• 104. Schreck CE, Posey K, Smith D. Durability of permethrin as a potential clothing treatment to protect against blood-feeding arthropods. J Econ Entomol. 1978; 71:397-400. Google Scholar
• 105. Schreck CE, Carlson DA, Weidhass DE, Posey K, Smith D. Wear and aging tests with permethrin-treated cotton-polyester fabric. J Econ Entomol. 1980; 73:451-3. Google Scholar
• 106. Gupta RK, Sweeney AW, Rutledge LC, Cooper RD, Frances SP, Westrom DR. Effectiveness of controlled-release personal-use arthropod repellents and permethrin-impregnated clothing in the field. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1987; 3:556-60. Google Scholar
• 107. Sholdt LL, Schreck CE, Qureshi A, Mammino S, Aziz A, Iqbal M. Field bioassays of permethrin-treated uniforms and a new extended duration repellent against mosquitoes in Pakistan. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1988; 4:233-6. Google Scholar
• 108. Lillie TH, Schreck CE, Rahe AJ. Effectiveness of personal protection against mosquitoes in Alaska. J Med Entomol. 1988; 25:475-8. Google Scholar
• 109. Belton P. An acoustic evaluation of electronic mosquito repellers. Mosquito News. 1981; 41:751-5. Google Scholar
• 110. Lewis DJ, Fairchild WL, Leprince DJ. Evaluation of an electronic mosquito repeller. Canadian Entomologist. 1982; 114:699-702. Google Scholar
• 111. Foster WA, Lutes KI. Tests of ultrasonic emissions on mosquito attraction to hosts in a flight chamber. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985; 1:199-202. Google Scholar
• 112. Mitchell M. Mythical mosquito control. Wing Beats. 1992; 3:18-20. Google Scholar
• 113. Nascl RS, Harris CW, Porter CK. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosquito News. 1983; 43:180-3. Google Scholar
• 114. Frick TB, Tallamy DW. Density and diversity of non-target insects killed by suburban electric insect traps. Entomological News. 1996; 2:77-82. Google Scholar
• 115. McCormack DR, Salata KF, Hershey JN, Carpenter GB, Engler RJ. Mosquito bite anaphylaxis: immunotherapy with whole body extracts. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995; 74:39-44. Google Scholar
• 116. Reunala T, Brummer-Korvenkontio H, Palosuo T. Are we really allergic to mosquito bites? Ann Med. 1994; 26:301-6. Google Scholar
• 117. Reunala T, Brummer-Korvenkontio H, Lappalainen P, Rasanen L, Palosuo T. Immunology and treatment of mosquito bites. Clin Exp Allergy. 1990; 20 Suppl 4:19-24. Google Scholar
• 118. Reunala T, Lappalainen P, Brummer-Korvenkontio H, Coulie P, Palosuo T. Cutaneous reactivity to mosquito bites: effect of cetirizine and development of anti-mosquito antibodies. Clin Exp Allergy. 1991; 21:617-22. Google Scholar
• 119. Brummer-Korvenkontio H, Lappalainen P, Reunala T, Palosuo T. Immunization of rabbits with mosquito bites: immunoblot analysis of IgG antimosquito antibodies in rabbit and man. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1990; 93:14-8. Google Scholar
• 120. Peng Z, Yang M, Simons FE. Immunologic mechanisms in mosquito allergy: correlation of skin reactions with specific IgE and IgG antibodies and lymphocyte proliferation response to mosquito antigens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996; 77:238-44. Google Scholar
• 121. Brummer-Korvenkontio H, Palosuo T, Francois G, Reunala T. Characterization of Aedes communis, Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi mosquito saliva antigens by immunoblotting. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1997; 112:169-74. Google Scholar
• 122. Reunala T, Brummer-Korvenkontio H, Karppinen A, Coulie P, Palosuo T. Treatment of mosquito bites with cetirizine. Clin Exp Allergy. 1993; 23:72-5. Google Scholar