Brief Communications15 January 1997
    Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
    Background:

    Loading doses of warfarin that are larger than those used for maintenance therapy are widely used in clinical practice, but they have never been prospectively evaluated.

    Objective:

    To compare the effect of 5- and 10-mg loading doses of warfarin on laboratory markers of warfarin's anticoagulant effect.

    Design:

    Randomized clinical trial.

    Setting:

    Tertiary care teaching hospital.

    Patients:

    49 patients seen over a 5-month period with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0.

    Intervention:

    Patients were randomly assigned to receive an initial dose of 5 or 10 mg of warfarin. Subsequent doses of warfarin were administered on the basis of dosing nomograms.

    Measurements:

    INRs and levels of factors II, VII, IX, and X and protein C were measured daily for 5 days.

    Results:

    11 of 25 patients in the 10-mg group (44% [95% CI, 34% to 54%]) and 2 of 24 patients in the 5-mg group (8% [CI, 3% to 14%]) had INRs greater than 2.0 at 36 hours (P = 0.005), at which time the factor VII levels were 27% (CI, 18% to 36%) in the 10-mg group and 54% (CI, 43% to 65%) in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001). In contrast, factor II levels were 74% (CI, 67% to 81%) in the 10-mg group and 82% (CI, 73% to 93%) in the 5-mg group (P > 0.2). At 60 hours, 9 of 25 patients in the 10-mg group (36% [CI, 17% to 54%]) and no patients in the 5-mg group had INRs greater than 3.0. At 84 hours, 15 of 24 patients in the 10-mg group (63% [CI, 43% to 81%]) and 19 of 24 patients in the 5-mg group (79% [CI, 62% to 95%]) had INRs between 2.0 and 3.0. Four patients in the 10-mg group and 1 patient in the 5-mg group received vitamin K for excessive prolongation of the INR.

    Conclusions:

    A 5-mg loading dose of warfarin produces less excess anticoagulation than does a 10-mg loading dose; the smaller dose also avoids the development of a potential hypercoagulable state caused by precipitous decreases in levels of protein C during the first 36 hours of warfarin therapy.

    References

    • 1. Quick AJ. The prothrombin time in haemophilia and in obstructive jaundice. J Biol Chem. 1935; 109:73-4. Google Scholar
    • 2. Hirsh J, Dalen JE, Deykin D, Poller L, Bussey H. Oral anticoagulants. Mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range. Chest. 1995; 108(4 Suppl):231S-46S. Google Scholar
    • 3. Hellemans J, Vorlat M, Verstraete M. Survival time of prothrombin and factors VII, IX, X after complete synthesis blocking doses of coumarin derivatives. Br J Haematol. 1963; 9:506-12. Google Scholar
    • 4. Roberts HR, Lechler E, Webster WP, Penick GD. Survival of transfused factor X in patients with Stuart disease. Thrombosis et Diathesis Haemorrhagica. 1965; 13:305-9. Google Scholar
    • 5. Vigano S, Mannucci PM, Solinas S. Decrease in protein C antigen and formation of an abnormal protein soon after starting oral anticoagulant therapy. Br J Haematol. 1984; 57:213-20. Google Scholar
    • 6. Okajima K, Koga S, Kaji M, Inoue M, Nakagaki T, Funatsu A, et al. Effect of protein C and activated protein C on coagulation and fibrinolysis in normal human subjects. Thromb Haemost. 1990; 63:48-53. Google Scholar
    • 7. Hull RD, Hirsh J, Jay R, Carter C, England C, Gent M, et al. Different intensities of oral anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1982; 307:1676-81. Google Scholar
    • 8. Turpie AG, Gunstensen J, Hirsh J, Nelson H, Gent M. Randomised comparison of two intensities of oral anticoagulant therapy after tissue heart valve replacement. Lancet. 1988; 1:1242-5. Google Scholar
    • 9. Saour JN, Sieck JO, Mamo LA, Gallus AS. Trial of different intensities of anticoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322:428-32. Google Scholar
    • 10. Altman R, Rouvier J, Gurfinkel E, D'Ortencio O, Manzanel R, de La Fuente L, et al. Comparison of two levels of anticoagulant therapy in patients with substitute heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991; 101:427-31. Google Scholar
    • 11. Landefeld CS, Rosenblatt MW. Bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: relation to the prothrombin time and important remediable lesions. Am J Med. 1989; 87:153-9. Google Scholar
    • 12. Landefeld CS, Goldman L. Major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: incidence and prediction by factors known at the start of outpatient therapy. Am J Med. 1989; 87:144-52. Google Scholar
    • 13. Johnston M, Harrison L, Moffat K, Willan A, Hirsh J. Reliability of the INR for monitoring the induction phase of warfarin: comparison with the prothrombin time ratio. J Lab Clin Med. 1996; 128:214-7. Google Scholar
    • 14. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. Thirty-third report. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1983; 687:81-105. Google Scholar
    • 15. Bigg R. Human Blood Coagulation. London: Blackwell Scientific; 1972:614. Google Scholar
    • 16. Griffin JH, Evatt B, Zimmerman TS, Kleiss AJ, Wideman C. Deficiency of protein C in congenital thrombotic disease. J Clin Invest. 1981; 68:1370-3. Google Scholar
    • 17. Wessler S, Gitel SN. Warfarin. From bedside to bench. N Engl J Med. 1984; 311:645-52. Google Scholar
    • 18. Zivelin A, Rao LV, Rapaport SI. Mechanism of the anticoagulant effect of warfarin as evaluated in rabbits by selective depression of individual procoagulant vitamin K-dependent clotting factors. J Clin Invest. 1993; 92:2131-40. Google Scholar