Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy and safety of thoracoscopy for the evaluation of pleural disease.

Design: Prospective evaluation of patients referred for thoracoscopy.

Setting: University hospital specializing in chest diseases.

Patients: We studied 102 patients with pleural disease, the cause of which had not been determined after initial investigation, including thoracentesis and needle biopsy. Eighty-six patients had pleural effusion, 11 had pleural mass, and 5 had pleural effusion in association with a known primary lung carcinoma.

Intervention: All patients had thoracoscopy under local anesthesia with mild sedation. Visually directed biopsies were done of parietal pleura.

Measurements: We recorded clinical characteristics, laboratory data, findings and duration of thoracoscopy, and any complications associated with the procedure. Hospital and clinic follow-up recordswere reviewed, and patients were contacted by telephone 12 and 24 months after thoracoscopy to assess their health status.

Main Results: One hundred and four thoracoscopies were done in 102 patients. A definitive diagnosis was established in 95 patients: 42 had malignant pleural disease and 53 had benign pleural disease. A diagnosis of benign pleural disease using thoracoscopy could not be confirmed in the remaining 7 patients because of insufficient follow-up information. Overall, thoracoscopy was 96% accurate with a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 93% for the diagnosis of pleural malignancy. Thoracoscopy was well tolerated under local anesthesia and entailed hospitalization for less than 24 hours in most cases. No deaths occurred, although 1.9% of patients had major complications, and 5.5% had minor complications.

Conclusions: Among patients with pleural disease remaining undiagnosed after usual initial investigation, thoracoscopy done under local anesthesia is a rapid, safe, and well-tolerated procedure with an excellent diagnostic yield that is equivalent to that of thoracotomy.

References

  • 1. Gunnels J. Perplexing pleural effusion. Chest. 1978;74:390-3. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Boutin CViallat JCargnino P, and Farisse P. Thoracoscopy in malignant pleural effusions. Am Rev Resp Dis. 1981;124:588-92. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Ryan CRodgers RUnni K, and Hepper N. The outcome of patients with pleural effusion of indeterminate cause at thoracotomy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1981;56:145-9. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Poe RIsrael RUtell MHall WGreenblatt D, and Kallay M. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of closed pleural biopsy. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:325-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Feinsilver SBarrows A, and Braman S. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and pleural effusion of unknown origin. Chest. 1986;90:516-9. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Pugatch RFaling LRobbins A, and Sider G. Differentiation of pleural lesions using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomog. 1978;2:601-6. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Halla JSchrohenloher R, and Volanakis J. Immune complexes and other laboratory features of pleural effusions: a comparison of rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, and other diseases. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92:748-52. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Light R. Pleural Diseases. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983. Google Scholar
  • 9. Canto ABlasco E, and Casillas M. Thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural effusion. Thorax. 1977;33:550-4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Weissberg D and Kaufman M. Diagnostic and therapeutic pleuroscopy: experience with 127 patients. Chest. 1980;78:732-5. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Enk B and Viskum K. Diagnostic thoracoscopy. Eur J Respir Dis. 1981;62:344-51. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. DeCamp PMoseley PScott M, and Hatch H. Diagnostic thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1973;16:79-84. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Oldenberg F and Newhouse M. Thoracoscopy, a safe, accurate diagnostic procedure using rigid thoracoscope and local anesthesia. Chest. 1979;75:45-50. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Page RJeffrey R, and Donnelly R. Thoracoscopy: a review of 121 consecutive surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48:66-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Wu MHsiue R, and Tseng K. Thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural effusions. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1989;19:116-9. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Colton T. Statistics in Medicine. Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown and Company; 1974. Google Scholar
  • 17. Legha S and Muggia F. Pleural mesothelioma: Clinical features and therapeutic implications. Ann Intern Med. 1977;87:613-21. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Canto AFerrer GRamagosa VMoya J, and Bernat R. Lung cancer and pleural effusion: clinical significance and study of pleural metastatic locations. Chest. 1985;87:649-51. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Meyer P. Metastatic carcinoma of the pleura. Thorax. 1966;21:437-42. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. McCaughey W and Al-jabi M. Differentiation of serosal hyperplasia and neoplasia in biopsies. Pathol Annu. 1986;1:271. Google Scholar
  • 21. Cantin RAl-jabi M, and McCaughey W. Desmoplastic diffuse mesothelioma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:215-22. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Davidson AGeorge RSheldon CSinha GCorrin B, and Geddes D. Thoracoscopy; assessment of a physician service and comparison of a flexible bronchoscope used as a thoracoscope with a rigid thoracoscope. Thorax. 1988;43:327-32. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Faurschou PMadsen F, and Viskum K. Thoracoscopy: influence of the procedure on some respiratory and cardiac values. Thorax. 1983;38:341-3. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Viskum A and Enk B. Complications of thoracoscopy. Poumon-Coeur. 1981;37:25-8. MedlineGoogle Scholar

This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon.